Slashdot Mirror


Boeing Successfully Tests Anti-Missile Laser

dankinit writes "MSNBC is reporting that a 'Boeing Co.-led team has successfully fired for the first time a powerful laser meant to fly aboard a modified 747 as part of a U.S. ballistic missile defense shield.' The test called 'First Light' has a budget of $474.3 million in the fiscal year 2005 and is part of a larger $10 billion dollar missile defense system."

16 of 868 comments (clear)

  1. First by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Troll

    This is my first first post!

  2. i hate to be blunt... by epiphani · · Score: -1, Troll

    but when was there ever a missile attack on any north american target? This money seems like a complete waste, that could have been spent on a much more useful project - like, say, an asteriod defence system.

    --
    .
    1. Re:i hate to be blunt... by rebeka+thomas · · Score: -1, Troll

      until 9/11 there had never been a terrorist flying a plane into a new york skyscraper

      There is still no evidence it WAS a terrorist act.

      --
      RST
    2. Re:i hate to be blunt... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Troll

      A Canadian who hates America... that's hilarious.

      On so many levels.

    3. Re:i hate to be blunt... by cybpunks3 · · Score: -1, Troll

      >

      Just got back from throwing roses on Arafat's tomb have you?

    4. Re:i hate to be blunt... by DigiShaman · · Score: 0, Troll

      Personally, I would rather piss on it. *grin*

      --
      Life is not for the lazy.
  3. Article mirror by Joey+Patterson · · Score: -1, Troll

    Here's an article mirror in case this one gets /.'ed.

  4. First proof of concept. by FiReaNGeL · · Score: 0, Troll
    They proved the laser worked for a fraction of second.

    Now, they still must :

    A- Improve duration & Power
    "In coming months, Englade said, engineers hope to boost the duration and power of the laser's beam.
    Among other technical challenges, Coyle said, engineers must figure out ways to fire the laser for the longer time needed to zap a missile without damaging the optics through which the beam passes -- a kind of technical Catch-22."

    B- Shootdown test... destroy a inflight dummy missile
    It will then be installed on a 747-400F aircraft for a test that includes shooting down a dummy ballistic missile over the Pacific. No date has been set for that test.


    And i guess C, get nuked by someone with the capability (nukes and missile range)... which is... hmmm... the Soviets? Iran? No... North Korea? No... China maybe? Aliens? Terrorists? Anyone?
    1. Re:First proof of concept. by SenatorOrrinHatch · · Score: 0, Troll

      Why do you hate America?

      --
      The Christian in me says it's wrong, but the corrections officer in me says, 'I love to make a grown man piss himself.'
  5. Dome by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Troll

    Wouldn't it be just as easy to build a dome over the united states? a dome would be just as fesable and make as much financial sense as this missile system.

  6. Re:Are they still.. by AvantLegion · · Score: 0, Troll
    >> Calling it star wars?

    > Yes, except this time, America shoots first.

    I can't decide whether to mod this Troll or Funny.

  7. Hmm... by solistus · · Score: -1, Troll

    Is this technology meant to be used on civilian transport aircraft? Making my family vacation to California a military target for whatever theoretical enemy is launching missiles at us sure doesn't make me feel safer, how 'bout you? Also, as others have pointed out, aren't there more practical ways to use this money? The Fed is already creating an enormous deficit with its overspending- are the sci-fi dreams of a megalomaniac with brain disease really the most effective use they can come up with, given the imminent collapse of Social Security, rocketing tax burden on the middle class, a grossly underfunded education and public service budget, the floundering of oh so many state economies, and countless other fiscal crises?

  8. What a bunch of crap! by mr_angry · · Score: 0, Troll

    This is absolutely ridiculous, and i really think all this money should be invested to help the population. Some people are starving, some people are sick. Why must we all put our money in fucking crap like missiles, anti missiles, going on the moon and shit. Nobody wants to fix things here ?? Kind of like when you're a developer and you find it boring to fix old apps compared to building new apps.

    Help the population, stop spending the money on crap like that. The whole terrorism thing is used by the american administration to manipulate the population...

    10 billions of american dollars, this would help a great deal of people in need of basic things like a home, food and things more important than pr0tact1ng t3h us fr0m t4h m4ss1l3s!

    I have a feeling than in many years ppl will laugh at this whole idea, pretty much like flying cars didn't happen when 2000 came. And the artist's rendition pic on the article page is just pure sci-fi stuff.

    --
    100% of statistics are wrong.
  9. Lotsa money but for a good cause? by pucko · · Score: -1, Troll

    First $474.3 million and then $10 billion dollars..

    Imagine how many people it could help if they were spent healthcare instead.
    Or maybe fund research to help protecting the enviroment and endangered species.

  10. Re:Missile Defense by myowntrueself · · Score: 0, Troll

    "Remember what happened to the technically challenged French in WWII?"

    I dunno, I still believe that the reason the French got 'steam rolled' was because of their love of super rare beef which happens to contain the spores of a brain parasite which slows reaction speeds by as much as 20%.

    --
    In the free world the media isn't government run; the government is media run.
  11. Re:Can't mention a troll... by True+Grit · · Score: 0, Troll
    How's fishing, buddy? I see you're trolling with artificial lures today. Had any luck?

    Now look who's trolling....