Slashdot Mirror


Atlantis Found. Again.

Tufriast writes "Paul McCartney and Mythic eat your heart out! BBC News has an interesting revelation regarding the lost city of Atlantis: "American researchers claim to have found convincing evidence that locates the site of the lost kingdom of Atlantis off the coast of Cyprus."" Hey, here's an idea: The idea of an almost mythical lost civilization is common thread throughout all old human societies - much like, say, really big Floods. Perhaps there could be more then one story that fits? But, no, that wouldn't be a simplistic enough answer to be sound-bitten into oblivion.

15 of 671 comments (clear)

  1. More than one story that fits? by fracai · · Score: 5, Insightful

    OR perhaps all the stories originated from one actual occurance, but have become distorted through years of relay from one generation to the next.

    --
    -- i am jack's amusing sig file
    1. Re:More than one story that fits? by caseydk · · Score: 5, Funny


      Everybody knows that Atlantis exists in another galaxy and was recently found by a multi-national Stargate team who found that much of the city was still operational and solar powered.

      I think they even started making a documentary series about this.

    2. Re:More than one story that fits? by saider · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Until there is evidence against the existance of such a creature, you cannot say they do not (or did not) exist.

      Go back several hundred years and tell them that there was ice on a moon of Jupiter. You would probably be laughed at, since everyone knew that anything in space was just a lump of rock.


      Again, proving a negative is not possible without evidence. Scientists several hundred years ago would not laugh at ice on the distant moons. They would simply want to see what evidence you base your assumption on. If you had no evidence, then you very well might be laughed out of town ( or excommunicated from the church ). But if you offered some equations based on some experiments that you conducted, then others would likely take a good look at what you had and validate or disprove your hypothesis.

      I get worried by people that ask me to prove something does not exist. That is not the scientific process. If you claim that something exists, then offer proof. Don't put an idea out there and say "Disprove this". This is often the basis for pseudoscience and is very dangerous because people not familiar with the scientific method (most people) will accept an unsupported hypothesis as fact because there is no "evidence" of the contrary.

      As to your argument, I cannot prove it does not exist. But the burden is on you to prove, not for me to disprove. The reasons against fire breathing dragons are the lack of evidence. We have a very well preserved record of the middle ages, and surely something as spectacular as a fire breathing dragon would be preserved somewhere. Artifacts from trophy hunters, lairs, bones, remains, etc are all lacking. All we have are stories to go on. Stories often embellish the facts to make for a more interesting story. Eg. "Who cares about the guy who killed a 7 foot monitor lizard, _My Friend_ killed a 20 foot lizard who breathed fire and shot lightning from his eyes!". So while the story may be based on a real creature, one needs to be able to separate fact from fiction. The easiest, most consistent way to do this is to demand evidence for any claims.

      --


      Remember, You are unique...just like everyone else.
    3. Re:More than one story that fits? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

      Oh for the love of...

      Okay; here's the deal. The Bible is translated and preserved extremely well from the original editions. The problem is this- where did the original edition come from?
      What? You want me to educate you? My pleasure. *Ahem* When Constantine wanted to have a state religion, he decided Christianity was the optimal choice, since at the time it had little set dogma, and hence little political baggage. A system of control for him to leverage without having to give up much control to a well-established church/religion.
      The problem? Everyone had their own stories about Jesus and the rest of the boys (this was 200-300 years after Jesus' death, mind you), and it's arguable how much of the stories were written and how many were passed by oral tradition (read: mostly bulls**t). So, Constantine convenes the Nicene council; mostly of religious leaders (Rabbis, proto-priests, etc.) and tells them to put together the "true" stories into a canonized book.
      What this should make you ask is: how much editorializing went into the bible to make it politically acceptable, and how many flat-out lies and half-truths went into to make it palatable for the masses and rulers?
      This is one major reason why I'm not a Christian.

    4. Re:More than one story that fits? by the_2nd_coming · · Score: 5, Insightful

      little political baggage? I guess you did not know that Christians were persecuted since the days of Nero because Nero blamed them for burning down part of Rome.

      hardly what you claim little political baggage.

      secondly, the Nicene council was not put together by Constantine and Rabbis weren't invited because by this time, the delineation between Christians and Jews had been set. there were bishops already, and it was the bishops that were at the meeting, no one else.

      thirdly. the 4 gospels were in fact written down by their authors as the original manuscripts have been dated to the first century AD. their truth value is of course limited because they contradict each other, but they were written to set Jesus up as a descendant of David so as to legitimize him.

      you do not have to make up a bunch of crap about why the bible is a bunch of crap, because for the most part, the new testament is made of original scripts dated from the time the acts were made. most of the stories are embellished to either make a political statement, or to set up the hero as someone special. the only thing we can take from the bible is that these people probably did exist, and that the apostles did a good job of selling the philosophy and legacy of Jesus.

      --



      I am the Alpha and the Omega-3
  2. It was found months ago!! by cyberlotnet · · Score: 5, Funny

    Where have you been hidding in a hole or something? I have been watching a elite team explore this place every friday night on the sci-fi channel, get with the program why don't you!

  3. Re:More to the point ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Atlantis clearly never existed. Everyone knows that earth appeared suddenly on a friday about 6000 years ago, and nothing has changed since. And anyway, if it did exist, everyone who died was evil. 'cept for Noah, he was cool. And a pigeon. And an olive tree, apparently. Hang on, who wrote this crap, anyway?

  4. Sonar isn't enough... by Gadgetfreak · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I'm not trying to be a pessimist, but making claims about finding Atlantis based on preliminary sonar imagery might be jumping the gun a little bit. In a sea that's been heavily travelled since human kind first built boats, it could be a lot of different things. Even if it's a civilization, it could be one of many Mediterrannean settlements that nobody knew was missing.

    My point is that until they come up with some underwater photos, artifacts, or both, it's a bit early to claim that they found something that might not have even existed in the first place.

    --
    "No fair, you changed the outcome by measuring it!" - Professor Hubert J. Farnsworth
  5. Would be nice by Gr8Apes · · Score: 5, Interesting
    if they finally did find the actual atlantis. They believe they've found the real Troy, finding the real Atlantis will hopefully put much speculation to rest.

    Personally, I'm just eager to see what they find, if it is found. Ancient archeological surprises are pretty cool, as it always astounds me how relatively advanced some of these civilizations were, to only fall back into ignorance before we finally moved into the modern age.

    --
    The cesspool just got a check and balance.
  6. I read this, but am a little suspect... by Fallen+Kell · · Score: 5, Informative
    I also read an article about the same event on CNN I believe (I am too lazy to post the link). In anycase, the side-scanning sonar did pick up what appear to be walls which do fit exactly the description of Atlantis (60-70 exact points corallate directly to the description of Atlantis).

    But I say I am skeptical about this discovery. Mainly because of who funded the expedition. It cost about $250k, which was raised by proceedes from book sales and donations, with the largest donation of $60k comming from a "Tourisim" society/acency in Cypris. Well, where does "Atlatis" show up? Off the coast of Cypris...

    --
    We were all warned a long time ago that MS products sucked, remember the Magic 8 Ball said, "Outlook not so good"
  7. Re:More to the point ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Oh, it's in Wikipedia. It must be true.

  8. Re:Plato made it up this parable. by Ralph+Wiggam · · Score: 5, Insightful


    Plato goes out of his way to say that the story NOT a parable and that Atlantis really existed.

    The information he's relaying is third or fourth hand and has been translated at least once (possibly multiplying all the numbers by 10).

    I keep an open mind about Atlantis because Troy was ficticious right up until someone found it.

    -B

  9. Is there a better URL? The Minoans are fascinating by ultraworld · · Score: 5, Interesting
    I'm fascinated by the culture of the ancient Minoans, that lived in this area during the late Bronze Age. The Atlantis myth is almost certainly about them. They thrived for at least 2000 years, until a series of volcanic events around 1700 BC that appear to have destroyed their major cities (and others) and ended in the assimilation of their culture into others, most notably the Mycaenians - the ancestors of the ancient Greeks, and the beginnings of a long dark age in the Mediterranean that halved the population or more, lasted several hundred years and reduced many area cultures to pre-literacy. Our historical era begins in the dawn of literacy out of the ashes of this time.

    The Minoan millennia's history is still almost completely unguessable. Archaeological sites that exist are difficult to find, sometimes obscured by this volcanic action, water (changing sea levels) or by the massive desertification that occurred in North Africa. There may be still much to learn from seawrecks on the bottom of the Mediterranean, though.

    These events probably also formed the factual basis for the Biblical plagues of Egypt. (huge volcano-caused climate changes, tsunamis, earthquakes, etc. resulting in a 'nuclear winter' lasting several years in which a significant portion of the Northern Hemisphere's population died of starvation.) The volcanic caldera of the present-day Aegean island of Santorini was probably the location of this explosion. The surviving Minoans clearly were scattered across the world...the Phoenecians, the Carthaginians, and many other ancient Semitic cultures (the Sephardic Jews and the Arabs) may all be descended from them. So were the Pelasgians. And perhaps the Philistines of the Biblical era.

    The Minoans were probably the real proto-Greeks.

    They are truly an enigma. It appears that they lived most of this time in peace, indeed, the remains of their cities that we have found never have walls. They had indoor plumbing, flush toilets, buildings up to five stories high. There are traces of their influence all the way from Spain to India. They were probably the model for Tolkien's "Numenorians", as well as many cultural myths.. Read Platos "Critas' and "Timmaeus' for his version of the story.. Its fascinating. They were Europe's first advanced civilization... Their written language (what little that we have) Linear A has still not been deciphered and it is one of the great mysteries in linguistics...and cryptology..

  10. Plato's Atlantis, not just any Atlantis by handy_vandal · · Score: 5, Informative

    Hey, here's an idea: The idea of an almost mythical lost civilization is common thread throughout all old human societies - much like, say, really big Floods. Perhaps there could be more then one story that fits? But, no, that wouldn't be a simplistic enough answer to be sound-bitten into oblivion.
    -Hemos, from the original post

    Hemos tries to make a good point, but reduces himself to ineffectual sarcasm -- evidently because he didn't RTFA.

    Yes, many cities were flooded and sunk in ancient times. Yes, these events have become mythologized as a generic Atlantis.

    But the article makes very clear: the discovers believe that *this* Atlantis is the Atlantis of Plato, because the dimesions and layout of the sunken city closely correspond to Plato's descriptions.

    -kgj

    --
    -kgj
  11. Re:Plato made it up this parable. by nine-times · · Score: 5, Interesting
    I keep an open mind about Atlantis because Troy was ficticious right up until someone found it.

    That's an interesting comparison, but at least there are indications that the Illiad, along with being a good story, may have been intended to be a sort-of "historical account". Certainly, as with many oral traditions, historical accounts become mythologised, re-interpreted with each generation, and generally skewed. However, since we don't anything like written documentation of the creation of "The Illiad", and it was supposed to be the story of how the Greek peoples united into being, together, "Greek", I find the idea that there was some historical intention hard to argue with.

    We are much more certain, however, about Plato. Plato was essentially a writer of fiction, and it's commonly agreed that he had little intention of being historically accurate. That being said, it's hard to know for sure if the Atlantis myth from the dialog was even a common Greek myth at the time, or if Plato invented it out of thin air.

    Additionally, with the discovery of Troy, an ancient city which archeological evidence seems to indicate was distroyed by Greeks at about the right time frame was discovered in about the right area, and many people agree that it is likely to be the city being referenced in the stories of Troy. However, this evidence verifies very little of the Greek's historical accounts of the war with Troy.