Slashdot Mirror


Disney to Make Toy Story 3 Without Pixar

rdurell writes "CNN is reporting that Disney has begun the process of setting up a new CGI studio with the goal of making Toy Story 3. Pixar has balked at the idea of another sequel thus far though Disney does own the rights to the franchise. Does this truly spell the end of the Disney-Pixar relationship? Can both Disney and Pixar live without the other?" We covered the Disney/Pixar breakup in January.

17 of 598 comments (clear)

  1. Already Split by Forthan+Red · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Pixar's realized it doesn't need Disney (all they've done lately is act as distributers). Disney killed their golden goose in an effort to grab a little more profit for themselved.

  2. I hope the voice actors refuse to participate by John+Harrison · · Score: 5, Interesting

    and that it quickly becomes a direct to video failure. C'mon Disney, is mining existing properties all that you have left in you? What happened to creativity anyhow?

  3. Stop Disney by tbo · · Score: 5, Interesting

    *Sigh*. Disney will ruin it--I don't think anything decent has come out of Disney in the past five or ten years, aside from the Pixar stuff. Does anyone know if Disney owns the rights to The Incredibles sequel? That would be really unfortunate...

    Perhaps Pixar can buy the rights back.

    1. Re:Stop Disney by jhkoh · · Score: 5, Interesting
      Does anyone know if Disney owns the rights to The Incredibles sequel?

      Not exactly. Here's more informatino, from an earlier post of mine quoting CNN:

      In addition, Disney probably will be able to make the sequels to all the Pixar films made under the current agreement, paying Pixar only limited royalties.

      While Pixar has the right of first refusal to make the sequels, under the current agreement it would have to put up half the money and get only 35 percent of the profit, which makes it extremely unlikely Pixar will make the sequels, said Jeffrey Logsdon, analyst with Harris, Nesbitt and Gerard.

  4. Disney has a chance by Mr+Guy · · Score: 4, Interesting

    With Eisner intending to step down, Disney may have a chance to get back to the role they played of wholesome fun. Right now they are cliched and trite. They went from inspiring imagination to the poster children of proving that trademarks don't spark innovation.

    I don't recall Walt ever drawing Mickey Mouse as a dirty dirty whore, but that's what he's become, pimped out around the world.

  5. Pixar... by Snowbeam · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Pixar will go on to do great things. Disney should have stuck with them. Pixar was fresh blood for Disney and they just gave that up. What were they thinking.

    --
    I am Lord Snowbeam. Heed my call!
  6. Pixar can do much better by catbutt · · Score: 5, Interesting

    without having to keep their stuff as purely kid-friendly and cutesy as Disney requires. The Incredibles was a step in the more-adult direction, but without Disney, they could do whatever their creative minds come up with, even if it is far edgier than a Disney cartoon.

    Of course, I speak as an adult fan of their work, not as a stockholder, nor as a 5 year old hoping for stuff my prudish parents will take me to.

  7. So... by Moby+Cock · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Will Disney be getting back into 2D animation again? After the debacle with Treasure Planet it seems to me that they have decided to forgo the idea of continuing the 2D flms. If they are going to focus their efforts on 3D it does make sense to sever ties with Pixar. If their future is in 3D then they need to increase their in-house experience in this realm. It seems a shame to stop the 2D stuff, but kids obviously prefer the 3D stuff. Disney is not about making art, and they know it, they are an entertainment company that churns out the stuff that sells. I don't think the Toy Story 3 will be any less of a hit without Pixar. I, for one, do not understand why Pixar is given such a vaunted status. The origibal Toy Story was something new and they deserved praise, but ever since they have just been re-jigging the formula.

  8. Looking forward to 'grown up' Pixar movies by Neil+Watson · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I am hoping that, with Disney out of the picture Pixar may create more mature movies. I love what they have done so far but, I feel Pixar has so much more potential.

    1. Re:Looking forward to 'grown up' Pixar movies by StikyPad · · Score: 3, Interesting

      More mature like what? Final Fantasy, The Movie? I don't there's much of a market for animated adult movies outside of Japan. Pixar does one thing, and does it well: they make great 3D animations, in the style of great 2D animations, ie, for kids. Even The Simpsons, one of the only animations that appeals equally to adults and kids, STILL appeals to kids. One of the other reasons Pixar is so successful is that its stories focus on inanimate/nonhuman/nonexistant characters. Sure, there were a few humans here and there, but they were still cartoonish. It's much easier to suspend disbelief when you're watching something cartoonish, as opposed to trying to make realistic people. And even if they succeeded in achieving realism, you'd still have to establish a genre by convincing people such a thing is more than just a novelty.. not an easy thing to do.

      *Was I the only one who thought Shark Tale sucked, by the way? What a cheap attempt at trying to steal some limelight from Finding Nemo.

  9. Pixar is the sniznit ... by dougmc · · Score: 4, Interesting
    Can both Disney and Pixar live without the other?
    Pixar keeps hitting them out of the park, movie after movie after movie. Nemo was great, and the Incredibles is even better ...

    Pixar does NOT need Disney. Maybe they're not really equipped to distribute their own movies, but they could certainly either become equipped or find somebody else who is. They have enough name recognition of their own that they don't need Disney anymore.

    Disney, on the other hand ... what's the last movie they did by themselves? Operation Dumbo Drop? Pocahantas II?

  10. Re:The End? by EvilTwinSkippy · · Score: 5, Interesting
    Disney is going to find that at the end of the day, Pixar is the one with brand recognition. Their last couple of animation pieces have been horrible.

    Not on technical ground mind you. On writing, plot design, and general creativeness they failed. The very fact that their first movie is a sequel of a sequel should tell you where they are coming from. Disney, the mighty, seems to think the only way to put out a CGI movie of any credibility is to duplicate a previous effort.

    (Sigh). Well, my one year old doesn't know or care how long Sleeping Beauty and The Little Mermaid have been out. It's all new to her. And I guess that's Disney's strategy.

    Walt is spinning in his grave.

    --
    "Learning is not compulsory... neither is survival."
    --Dr.W.Edwards Deming
  11. Where all good ideas come to die by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    "What happened to creativity anyhow"

    The name's Eisner, Michael Eisner.

    I used to work for Disney. I called it creative purgatory. The company is so inbred that there is little hope for change without a radical shake up. I think realistically the only way of fixing the company is for a hostile take over that would allow for changing most of the executive staff and eventually most of the surpervisers. The inbreding goes all the way from top to bottom. We used to call them second and third generation as in the family had worked for Disney that many generations. Even worse now is it's all Eisner's cronies and their friends. Most have no creative ability. Creative people are often seen as a threat and tend not to do well. Personally I quit and you couldn't pay me enough to go back. The joke is if Walt were alive I'd have stayed with the company for life. They're ruined the best company in Hollywood and the box office reflects the disaster it's become.

  12. Re:In other news... by Pseudonym · · Score: 4, Interesting

    ...and before Tezuka, the story was called Hamlet.

    When will people learn that no story is 100% original?

    --
    sub f{($f)=@_;print"$f(q{$f});";}f(q{sub f{($f)=@_;print"$f(q{$f});";}f});
  13. Re:You bet they can by KeithGap · · Score: 5, Interesting

    That story about Jeffrey Katzenberg isn't really true. The person who redesigned Woody was Bud Luckey, the animator who produced the "Boundin'" short that is showing with "The Incredibles". He's the oldest guy at Pixar and everyone jumps to work on his projects. I think the story is just Katzenberg blowing his own horn, which he seems to do quite often.

  14. Re:Disney always has an "out" by System.out.println() · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I'm not sure why no one likes the Cars trailer... But then, I thought Monsters, Inc, looked stupid and it turned out to be one of my favorite movies, and I'm not making that mistake again :P

  15. You're both wrong by rjung2k · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Pixar was in the middle of developing a shoddy direct-to-video Toy Story 2 when they realized such a thing would damage their reputation. John Lasseter specifically said, "We didn't want to be known as a studio that did great stuff and crap -- we want it all to be great."

    They pushed to make Toy Story 2 a theatrical release, tossed out the stuff they had done so far, retooled the story from the beginning, worked themselves to deliver a quality product, and the rest is history.

    Too bad any Disney-produced Toy Story 3 won't have half the love and care that Pixar gave to their movies.