Slashdot Mirror
Ankylosaurs Had Composite Armor
An anonymous reader writes "Ankylosaurs were the most heavily armored dinosaurs. Researchers thought their protective plates were a lot like modern crocodiles. But a new study by a University of Bonn grad student Torsten Scheyer found that fibers in the plates were woven for strength and lightness much like Kevlar or fiberglass. Good thing, as ankylosaurs had to contend with T. rex."
I understand how they can talk about the structure of the armor, but, given that these are fossils, and therefore have had their organic substance replaced by minerals, how do they know what the structure was composed of?
had to contend with T Rex
Not so. The Tyrannosaurus Rex was, according to consensus of scientific opinion, a opportunistic scavenger rather than an out and out predator, despite what films such as Jurassic Park portray. Heavy plate armour is so successful a defense mechanism, you might wonder why many more species don't utilise it.
This just goes to show that Nature, with a decent head start, can produce some pretty spectacular materials, an example that springs to mind is Morpho menelaus a butterfly with striking laser-blue irridescent wings, which uses an optical trick to make them shine so brightly. I was always fascinated by a little tray my father had when I was a kid, which was just the top side of the wings of these butterflies pressed under glass. I had a hard time believing it was from an organic being. Anyway, you can't get things like that anymore (I've looked) which is probably due to them having to be a protected species. Shame on all of us really, for hunting these creatures to near extinction, like the dinosaurs.
Meine Schwester ist sehr, sehr reizvoll - Nietzsche
GTRacer
- Is that like the oo-ray?
Defending IP by destroying access to it? That makes sense, RIAA/MPAA. Go to the corner until you can play nice!
I will ask you to label two modern creatures to show why talking about t-rex eating behaviour is so futile.
Would you label the Hyena as a predator or a scavenger? And the lion?
Modern studies show that the scavenger Hyena kills a higher percentage of its food then the lion. Yet many still label the killer hyena as the scavenger and the lion known to eat hyena left overs as the predator.
Some people claim that t-rex build was unsuitable to hunt (head to big unable to run for long). Some claim that it build was exactly right to an ambush style hunt where it would deliver one large trauma wound and then use its nose to track the animal as it slowly died.
The same nose could also be used to find already dead prey.
Most like t-rex filled both roles shifting from one to the other as circumstances dictated. There are pure predators who refure to eat already dead animals but they are rare. Most predators are also scavengers and even some well known herbivores eat meat if they come upon it.
Talking about the movie. If you want to nitpick then nitpick that movie itself describes that the T-rex has a good nose but is somehow unable to small a scared human right infront of it. Even my cat spots a meal if you rub its nose in it. And this animal mews when I open a paint can.
MMO Quests are like orgasms:
You may solo them, I prefer them in a group.
From the article:
This huge, extremely heavy reptile was an herbivore (it ate only plants).
It had to eat a huge amount of low-lying plant material to sustain itself so
its gut must have been very large. It probably had a fermentation compartment
to aid in the digestion of the tough plant material, producing prodigious
amounts of gas!
Better call it Puteosaurus then.
It's worth noting that your teeth get their strength from the same technique. Short story, your teeth are made from the same material as bone, but it's woven, leaving them stronger than bones.
Sure I'm paranoid, but am I paranoid enough?
This dino was victimised by T-Rex? I suggest a mini and a quick collision with a tree will end his woes.
Shame on all of us really, for hunting these creatures to near extinction, like the dinosaurs.
Hmm... Well, if humanity hunted the dinosaurs to near extinction, as your post implies, I suppose this means we didn't hunt them to complete extinction, which implies that there are still dinosaurs around today -- and that there were a lot more dinosaurs back in Cro-Magnon times.
Um...
Seriously, if you're going to engage in Green humanity-bashing, at least check that you're using the right stick.
Kevlar is pretty much useless against a knife attack - it's designed to collapse in front of an object with at least a little bit of distributed pressure (like a bullet), whereas a blade can slice right through it. By that logic, Kevlar-like armor to protect against a dinosaur's teeth would be just about as effective as a firm pillow. Meanwhile, fiberglass is damn near impossible to stab a knife through, while its effectiveness against bullets varies greatly depending on how it's made. In other words, pretty much exactly the opposite of Kevlar.
So I guess I must be missing something here... how is this dinosaur's armor similar to both Kevlar and fiberglass? Or is it really nothing at all like either of them except that it's strong and light?
If you get nervous, just remember that there are a few billion other people who don't really give a damn.
adam was actually T-rex!
Is determining how such information will aid the United States Government and RATT in successfully fighting the Dinobots
Regards, Ian