Slashdot Mirror
Should We Follow Novell v. MS in Detail?
e6003 writes "Groklaw has a fascinating article written by a retired attorney. In short, he believes FOSS advocates should be following the recently announced Novell anti-trust case against Microsoft with as much vigour as we do the SCO-IBM case. Whilst the latter is to all intents and purposes settled in favour of the Good Guys, the article points out how Novell v. MS is far harder to call. Evidence produced during this new case, he argues, may be valuable for proving anti-competitive intent on Microsoft's behalf should MS (or a proxy) go on a patent rampage against FOSS. Finally, the article points out that Microsoft either destroys evidence itself (see the Burst.com case) or requires evidence to be destroyed as part of settlements (as in the Caldera DR-DOS case)."
Dude, I just read all 68 pages. Thank you Fun With Phonics.
Anyone seen my jagged little pill?
no the formula is:
women are time and money thus translated in to the equation:
women = time * money
and since time is money
women = money * money or
women = money^2
and since money is the root of all evil
women = (evil^1/2)^2 and thus
women = evil
There you have it pure mathematics, women are evil. And since this is slashdot and of course we know that we are not the evil ones, there are no women on slashdot and we don't associate with their evil kind.
Hmmm... begs the question though, if this holds true, is Bill Gates really a woman?
www.ip-wars.net
Be warned: it's long.
1000 SlashDot sigs
passed some 17 novell tests and am qualified to train, and to the question: "Should We Follow Novell v. MS in Detail", I say.... No.
Spent probably 8 years of my life doing novell, and sorry, but its dead.