Slashdot Mirror


Soviet Space Battle Station Images Published

An anonymous reader writes "Images of the Soviet Union's laser space battle station Skif and its prototype Polyus have been published on the web. Polyus-Skif was the Soviet response to the American 'Star Wars' program of the 1980s. The Polyus was launched in May 1987 but a faulty sensor caused it to de-orbit into the South Pacific. More information can be found at Encyclopedia Astronautica."

32 of 350 comments (clear)

  1. ...but a faulty sensor caused it to de-orbit... by DaneelGiskard · · Score: 4, Funny

    ...yes, I would pretend this as well ;-)

    1. Re:...but a faulty sensor caused it to de-orbit... by CrowScape · · Score: 4, Funny

      No, it would link it to the Arilou Lalee'lay, indicating that the Soviets had a secret deal with them to obtain a quasispace portal generator. I always knew Falayalaralfali was Red!

      --
      common sense: noun
      What those who are ignorant of the subject matter think; usually wrong.
  2. Wow by The-Bus · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I especially like this picture, which seems to almost be a spy shot froma James Bond movie, or as one of the posters commented, "Looks very Thunderbirds-ish."

    --

    Small potatoes make the steak look bigger.

    1. Re:Wow by Rorschach1 · · Score: 4, Interesting

      What I find interesting is the marking on the side that says 'MIR-2'. I guess it would have been launched just after the original Mir station. Seems a little ironic to name a battle station 'Peace', though I guess it can be translated as 'Earth' too.

      The picture of the launch vehicle being erected is classic. Looks like either the world's largest surface-to-air missile or a 1950's idea of a rocket ship.

    2. Re:Wow by HeghmoH · · Score: 4, Informative

      Russian launch practices are fascinating. They basically cart the rocket out on a huge truck, turn it upright, and fire it off. They routinely launch in horrible weather. By comparison, the US space program uses an incredibly slow and expensive system to take the things to the launch pad while they're upright. They launched one time when it was a tad cold and the entire thing blew up. On the other hand, Apollo 12 was struck by lightning twice during the launch, and went on to land on the Moon.

      --
      Mod down posts with a "Free Mac Mini/iPod" sig, they're spam!
  3. See a picture... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    here, just in case that one gets Slashdotted. It's already starting to look beat-up.

  4. In Soviet Russia by cheezemonkhai · · Score: 5, Funny

    War Stars You!!

    What it had to be said.. at least it's out the way now :p

  5. Software error by YeeHaW_Jelte · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Comments at the website (yes I RTFA) say it wasn't a faulty sensor but a software error which caused the Polyus to turn 360 instead of 180 degree upon reaching orbit, and it boosted itself back into the atmosphere. Oops!

    --

    ---
    "The chances of a demonic possession spreading are remote -- relax."
    1. Re:Software error by fizze · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Such errors seem common. I believe it was the F-16 which had a similiar problem with the artificial horizon, causing it to rotate 180 when crossing the aequator. It has (luckily) been found and fixed.

      --
      Powerful is he who overpowers his temptations.
    2. Re:Software error by YrWrstNtmr · · Score: 4, Insightful

      That bug was found and fixed during simulation testing. It never made its way into actual flight software.
      Luck had nothing to do with it. Good test procedures caught it.

  6. Thats not a battle station... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    ... it's a moon.

  7. BREAKING NEWS: Soviet Battle Station Slashdotted! by Average_Joe_Sixpack · · Score: 4, Funny

    This will not bode well for us geeks! Does anybody have a laser proof tin foil hat I can borrow??

  8. Re:Oh man that thing is uber Cool!!! by hostylocal · · Score: 5, Funny

    $50 for the wreckage $8000 p+p $2.5b for raising it from the bottom of the south pacific buyer pays postage and all associated costs. pay pal accepted.

  9. Re:Old Soviet Overlords by AeternitasXIII · · Score: 5, Informative

    Soviet propaganda did a really good job of pumping up their apparent strength, but their economy was in dire straits since the mid-1970s. By the time Carter and Reagan had maneuvered the US into backing Iraq vs. the nominally Soviet supported Iran, the Soviets were already well on their way to bankruptcy. The Star Wars program and the resultant Soviet reaction to it probably only hastened the demise of the country by a year at most, according to many economists.

  10. "One thing i can tell you - Energia Corp now by Sai+Babu · · Score: 4, Interesting

    workin on Mars mission."

    A most interesting comment from the guy who provided the photos.

    Perhaps he woudl be willing submit to a /. interview?

    1. Re:"One thing i can tell you - Energia Corp now by dr_d_19 · · Score: 5, Informative

      And perhaps a good ground for the interview would be Energia Corps' own Martian Mission web

  11. De-Orbit? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Is that just scientist speak for CRASHED? Damn, you guys think you can make poo-poo smell like roses with words can't you? The damn thing crashed into the ocean, it didn't de-orbit. Its like a salesman saying he didn't get the account because the customer de-bought the product.

  12. If the USSR had that back then.... by Devar · · Score: 4, Interesting

    ...just imagine what the USA might just have up there right now.

    --
    It's a Bagel.
    1. Re:If the USSR had that back then.... by FireAtWill · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I read a book written by Air Force General Chuck Horner (Ret.) who commanded the air war over Desert Storm. Before retiring his last job was heading up SPACECOM, the military's space command. In describing that he remarked (paraphrasing) "There are many people who think that we shouldn't start putting weapons in space. Well, I've got news for them. There already there.

      In any conflict with the US, our communications, global positioning and recon sattellites would be prime juicy targets.

    2. Re:If the USSR had that back then.... by WIAKywbfatw · · Score: 4, Interesting

      First rule of combat: disable the enemies eyes and ears. If he's blinded because you took out his intelligence gathering satellites, he's not only lost what realtime intelligence he had coming in but he now also has to expend other resources (ie, manpower in the form of reconnaisance missions) to try and get some of that back. And with his communications satellites gone too, his ability to effectively manage is greatly diminished too.

      You can't hit what you can't see. Sounds obvious but in warfare it can be the only difference between winning and getting spanked.

      --

      "Accept that some days you are the pigeon, and some days you are the statue." - David Brent, Wernham Hogg
  13. de-orbit... by phasm42 · · Score: 4, Funny

    That's a nice euphism for crash and burn.

    --
    "No one likes working in a hamster wheel, and your shop smells of cedar shavings from here." - TaleSpinner
  14. Launch Failure Conspiracy Theory by Catmeat · · Score: 4, Interesting

    There is a theory the lunch failure was intentional.

    Gorbachev had just come to power and wanted to make peace overtures to the West. A giant space battle station was not going to help this endeavour so a deliberate "launch failure" would be the simplest and easiest way of getting rid of the darn thing and shutting down the program.

    As I said, it's nothing more than a theory I've heard articulated. I've no idea how much credability or plausibility it has.

  15. History Channel Last Night by DnemoniX · · Score: 5, Informative

    Funny that the History Channel ran a show last night on disasters in the Soviet space program. What was very interesting was some seriously devistating disasters that the world at large never knew about until years after the wall came down. One was really impressive, the rocket exploded on the pad killing over 150 people and burning for hours. In another the rocket began to launch, but flipped sideways and dropped. The damage to the launch facility was so bad it took two years to get in back into usable shape. All the while Khrushchev was mocking the US efforts as backwards and offering assistance to a "backwards" nation. Meanwhile covering up their mega-disasters. So it makes you wonder what "really" happened to this thing.

    1. Re:History Channel Last Night by LWATCDR · · Score: 4, Interesting

      The US had more than one failure it's self during the early days. I saw pictures of an Atlas cart wheeling through the sky. The Navaho missle got the nickname the Nogo. I have even seen a Thor with a live H-Bomb on it fail at blast off the warhead did not go off thank goodness for the launch crew. That was part of test to see what happens when you blow up a nuke in space. The difference is in the US most of the failures where public.

      --
      See my blog http://ilovecookes.blogspot.com/ for light hearted technical information.
  16. Re:Old Soviet Overlords by Lisandro · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Even while it was an awfully managed country, economically, the Russians pulled out some impressive engenieering feats, specially in the field of aeronautics. In the cold war days, it was all about conquering space, for some reason, and the USSR was right there - neck to neck with the USA. And they had the military power indeed, so they were, arguably, powerful.

    If anything, the fall of the USSR saddened me for that very reason. It seems the true technological progress comes in times of war, even when it's a "cold" one.

  17. Re:Yep, number increment by WIAKywbfatw · · Score: 4, Informative

    That's because what it looks like you're seeing in those pictures is the orbiter on its launch vehicle. The orbiter alone (the black thing, if I'm reading things correctly) is probably what those measurements you have are referring to, so that expains the disparity between the pictures and the numbers.

    --

    "Accept that some days you are the pigeon, and some days you are the statue." - David Brent, Wernham Hogg
  18. Re:Leads one to ponder the relative computing powe by foobsr · · Score: 5, Insightful

    considering the time & a probable computation error

    from ./ ... "Seems as though the Genesis spacecraft was able to launch from earth, travel through space, avoid aliens, and cruise back into the atmosphere to be caught by stunt pilots waiting patiently with their helicopters. Alas, the brakes didn't work because a sensor was designed upside down.

    With all the advanced technology, nothing similar or remotedly comparable happens in the new millenium.

    CC.

    --
    TaijiQuan (Huang, 5 loosenings)
  19. Been there, done that by Dan+East · · Score: 4, Insightful

    No member of the Reagan or Bush administrations ever admitted or revealed publicly any knowledge of Polyus. The US Navy has made no statements about any attempts to investigate the wreckage of Polyus, which lies on the floor of the South Pacific.

    For some reason the phrase "been there, done that" comes to mind.

    Considering the amount of money spent on SDI, I can't imagine the US not going to great lengths to try to salvage the wreck in order to see what countermeasures the USSR was working on.

    Dan East

    --
    Better known as 318230.
  20. Re:Old Soviet Overlords by Meredeth · · Score: 5, Informative

    Yes. A previous poster mentioned a large rocket prototype exploding on the launchpad and killing 150 people. That rocket was supposed to do the same job as the saturn rocket, but failed due to vibration problems ( I think it had 11 engines ). Energia is the rocket that they wanted to build in the 1960's. Its a fantastic design. It can loft Buran into space, or just a giant container, so it can lift quite a bit more than the shuttle could. If the russians can ever fund a major mars mission, Energia can launch just about anything they can think of.

  21. Re:Stratoshperic Archeology by magarity · · Score: 5, Informative

    the latest peice of crap we found floating around in low orbit (that noone had a record of being up there

    I'd say that was fairly unlikely. See, there are these satellites called 'launch detectors' the US military has that picks up rocket heat signature blooms within seconds anywhere in the world. So they know at least something is taking off and where it is going. And then there are these other things called 'telescopes' that let people on the ground look at things in space. Combine the two and while there might be some military satellite whose exact use is secret, there really isn't anything in orbit that isn't well known.

  22. Re:violated USSR - USA treaty? by virg_mattes · · Score: 4, Informative

    Not this time. The treaty forbade launching armed craft, but although this thing was slated as a weapons platform, the first unit was sent up without armaments, and no others went up because the project was scrapped with the fall of the Soviet Union.

    Virg

  23. Re:Stratoshperic Archeology by Oddly_Drac · · Score: 4, Informative

    "There's lots of junk up there."

    And the majority is being tracked by NORAD down to the size of around a basketball; which is the major reason why they actually justify the Cheyenne mountain budget. No. No points for Stargate jokes. Note that this addresses your point about tracking being limited; the military stares outwards.

    Civilian tracking is generally a matter of watchin g for new stuff. "we still don't know where the radioactive material on the spacecraft landed."

    It's the largely technical problem of finding an object the size of a basketball in an oval area 150 miles wide in the minor axis by 7000 miles in the long axis, the majority of that being water. 270 grams isn't much, and it's probably fairly safe for the moment.

    "Maybe not so much with something this big, but you could always claim that it's an expended booster or maybe a failed research satellite if you didn't want anyone paying attention to it."

    This was what they said about some Bigbird satellites, except someone did point out that failed satellites don't change orbit. I think that the veil of secrecy surrounding KH lasted for all of five years.

    --
    Oddly Draconis
    Too cynical to live, too stubborn to die.