Slashdot Mirror


GIMP 2.2 Splash Screen Competition

Lalakis writes "The GIMP 2.2 Splash Contest is now officially open! Competition entries should be attached to the live.gnome.org wiki before midnight next Sunday. Submit your work and get the glory (there may be a small prize sponsored, too)."

52 of 257 comments (clear)

  1. My Favorite Splash Screen by stecoop · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The only good Splash Screen is a dead one.

    How about having no splash screen as an option and let everyone else stare at the pretty picture for N seconds. I have so many windows open that I don't need to have something else occupying my desktop. To me, splash screens are annoying like browser popups - which I haven't seen in months thanks Mozzy that also has the alias & shortcut command option of nosplash.

    1. Re:My Favorite Splash Screen by Meostro · · Score: 5, Informative
      As per the link in the mighty $'s post below, start gimp with
      gimp -s
      to disable the spalsh screen completely.
    2. Re:My Favorite Splash Screen by stecoop · · Score: 5, Insightful

      There should be a universal standard for all application in the development community where the command --nosplash will disable splash screens.

    3. Re:My Favorite Splash Screen by oexeo · · Score: 3, Insightful

      > The only good Splash Screen is a dead one.

      They do have a purpose though, they hide the fact the program takes forever to initialize

    4. Re:My Favorite Splash Screen by shufler · · Score: 3, Insightful

      An environment variable would be a better option, because really -- if you disable the splash screen on one program, don't you also want to disable it on all programs?

    5. Re:My Favorite Splash Screen by DaHat · · Score: 2, Interesting

      True... but the problem with trying to go with an environmental variable for such an option is at what point does it stop?

      There are plenty of application level settings that could be offloaded to the environment with envars permitting more uniform settings on a system... but the standardization of even a portion of such possibilities would be a nightmare. Better to leave each app alone as their own island.

    6. Re:My Favorite Splash Screen by Pxtl · · Score: 2, Funny

      Gee, its too bad Linux doesn't have a single, consolidated tree-based system for storing type-specific environment variables. It would be handy for registryng such things.

      j/k.

      One flat file per app is fine, thanks. Alternately, the Windows registry wouldn't be so bad if it was easy to find keys related to program X or Y (rather than its sluggish search) and the damn thing had some form of docstrings. If Python has tought me one thing, its that you can never have too many docstrings.

    7. Re:My Favorite Splash Screen by DocSnyder · · Score: 2, Insightful
      A status bar or a progress window would serve better than any nice picture.

      Why not delegate splash screens to a special daemon which can be decorated with skins, docked into the KDE/GNOME panel or just deactivated?

  2. Hmm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I wonder how many submissions of the Goatse guy they'll recieve.

  3. GIMP Splash Screens by the_mighty_$ · · Score: 4, Informative
    --
    VI VI VI - the editor of the beast!
  4. will my submisson get disqualified by hsmith · · Score: 5, Funny

    if i do it in Photoshop?

    1. Re:will my submisson get disqualified by TheSurfer · · Score: 2, Funny

      Not if you re-save the file afterwards in The Gimp ;)

    2. Re:will my submisson get disqualified by silicon-pyro · · Score: 2, Funny

      if I do it in M$ Paint?

      it sounded good in my head.

  5. BRING OUT THE GIMP by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    The Gimp's asleep

    Well I guess you better wake him up then

  6. Spash Archive by Ford+Prefect · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Something I've liked in the past from compiling development versions of the Gimp are the development splash screens. Frequently containing giant photos of bugs (for squashing, obviously), fake news report screengrabs or some other warped aspects of the programmers' humour, they often show that programmer art isn't necessarily a bad thing.

    Although a couple of them were astoundingly crude - but I think that was intentional. :-)

    --
    Tedious Bloggy Stuff - hooray?
  7. And the winner is... by CodeWanker · · Score: 5, Funny

    Goatse! Goatse! Goatse!

    --


    "Wow. Now THAT'S a lot of angry Indians." - Lt. Col. George Armstrong Custer
    1. Re:And the winner is... by archen · · Score: 5, Funny

      That's one way to force development to get Gimp to load as fast as possible.

  8. What's with the animated icon? by Xetrov · · Score: 4, Funny

    That animated topic icon sent me through a rollercoaster of emotions:

    1. I was scared - been playing Doom3 all day, I'm a bit jumpy
    2. Denial - I thought I imagined it
    3. Relief - I'm not crazy
    4. Disgust - I just wasted a few minutes of my life describing an emotional journey spawned by a few moving pixels on /.

    1. Re:What's with the animated icon? by CvD · · Score: 3, Informative

      Slashdot's topic icon for the GIMP is animated (the only animated icon). Watch his eyes. :-)

  9. What would be better by oexeo · · Score: 4, Insightful

    This competition is great, but maybe a "design GIMP a decent fucking GUI" contest would be better?

    1. Re:What would be better by Fallingcow · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Eh, sorry then, just assumed it was. Posts like that on Gimp stories are usually trolls. In spite of that, I usually agree with them :(

      The Gimp GUI is on of the most crap-tastic ones I've ever seen. Sad, because it's a nice program, but I can never get anyone to use for any length of time because the GUI is so frustrating and non-intuitive.

    2. Re:What would be better by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I'll add my 2c here in agreement.

      I started out in graphics with gimp. I had enough interest in pixelling to want to continue, to learn the roped and put up with the difficulties. I'd been TOLD that graphics was hard, and it was tedious indeed.

      Then I used Photoshop, ready to scoff at the proprietary solution costing so many thousands and doing no more than gimp. Within 2 weeks I'd gone out and bought photoshop because no matter how much you listen to someone else's experience with a program, there is nothing more revealing than using it yourself. Gimp feels nearly feature complete, but in the same way a large rock is feature complete with a set of six various sized hammers. When you need to hit something and do it right, the hammers let you do it exactly how you want to.

      Photoshop is a set of hammers.

    3. Re:What would be better by Lalakis · · Score: 2, Informative

      The pending 2.2 release will add previews for most filters. Unsharp mask included... You can find a list of what's new in this release here.

    4. Re:What would be better by exp(pi*sqrt(163)) · · Score: 3, Insightful

      There's a difference between doing occasional jobs in Gimp and trying to use it professionally i.e. for 10 hours a day. I pity anyone who works for a company that refuses to pay for Photoshop and makes their employees use Gimp. The underlying engine in Gimp is probably good enough for a lot of work but the user interface is just plain horrible when compared to Photoshop.

      --
      Doesn't it make you feel good to know that our freedoms are protected by politicans, lawyers and journalists.
    5. Re:What would be better by BigSven · · Score: 2, Informative

      You should consider to setup X to have two screens then. GIMP supports this quite nicely and will remember on which screen you want it's windows to appear. It also allows you to move windows between the screens (which is a functionality that the WM should offer actually).

    6. Re:What would be better by FooBarWidget · · Score: 2, Informative

      I occasionally work in Gimp for about 4 hours a day. And no, the interface is not plain horrible.

    7. Re:What would be better by jejones · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Perhaps a good first step towards that would be if people sharing that opinion would post something more informative and detailed than "GIMP UI sux0rs" and "Photoshop UI rules."

  10. how about... by flacco · · Score: 4, Insightful

    ...one that says "*Still* only 8-bit color!"

    --
    pr0n - keeping monitor glass spotless since 1981.
    1. Re:how about... by Lalakis · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Most people don't really need it, but more than 8-bit per pixel color is coming soon. Next release (2.4) will add color management capabilities and the one after that (3.0), planned for the next fall, will add higher bit depth, layer effects and pretty much everything you want (all that because of the GEGL library intergration).

    2. Re:how about... by Queuetue · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Could you point towards a roadmap for Gimp development? (And please tell me they are working to improve the text layer tools! :) )

    3. Re:how about... by Lalakis · · Score: 2, Informative

      Unfortunately, there isn't a formal roadmap at the moment for gimp 2.4, but you can find a lot of info about what you should expect from gimp 3.0. Look here and search google for more.

      What's the problem with text layer tools? Everyone seems very happy with them and you shouldn't expect a change anytime soon...

    4. Re:how about... by BigSven · · Score: 2, Informative

      It's coming. Text transformations are definitely on my list of things I want to do for 2.4. And now that Pango offers this functionality, it should actually be rather simple to implement.

  11. OpenOffice.org by Uukrul · · Score: 2, Informative

    OpenOffice.org it's seeking a new Splash Screen too. (Splashscreen for OpenOffice.org 2.0 Wanted
    One Splash Screen, two opportunities to win.

    And remeber to make it really evil.

    --
    My city: Barcelona.
  12. A Plush Prize. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    "Submit your work and get the glory (there may be a small prize sponsored, too)."

    A Wilbur (The GIMP Mascot) plushie.

  13. Java Programs Need Them by the_mighty_$ · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Actually, some splash screens are good for something. Think about Java programs that have to be runtime compiled, they usually take long times to load. In a case like that, a splash screen is extremely useful.

    --
    VI VI VI - the editor of the beast!
  14. While they're at it... by jejones · · Score: 3, Interesting

    ...could they also ditch the ghastly font the splash screen uses for "the gimp"?

  15. background load while using it would be nice by jago25_98 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I'd prefer to be able to use it while it loads the bigger things like plugins in the background.

    Waiting (about 30 seconds?) is a pain when you only want to edit an 16 pixel icon especially.

    p.s. aren't message boxes also awful too, interrupting work and stealing focus... oh, I had typed more but lost it all after gimp loaded up and changed focus while I was typing and looking at keyboard.

    1. Re:background load while using it would be nice by BigSven · · Score: 2, Interesting

      30 seconds? It's more like 5 seconds. The first startup is slow since all plug-ins need to be queried but this info is cached and subsequent startup is a lot faster.

      I do have some ideas though that would reduce the startup time further. Some of this might make into GIMP 2.4...

    2. Re:background load while using it would be nice by duggy_92127 · · Score: 2, Funny
      oh, I had typed more but lost it all after gimp loaded up and changed focus while I was typing and looking at keyboard.

      Quick fix: learn to type.

      (I kid.)

      Doug

  16. In this country by jasonbowen · · Score: 2, Funny

    first you get the splash screen... then you get the power... then you get the women

  17. PARENT MOD SMOKED CRACK ! by mirko · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I don't think the parent was off topic : this is Slashdot and there are trolls who may profit from this open Wiki page so, be sure there will be many flavoured submissions, including the goatse, tubgirl, lemon party, GNAA manifestoes...
    It's a serious question and even if it could be seen as either frightening or funny, I do NOT think it's off topic.

    --
    Trolling using another account since 2005.
  18. Wait a minute! by scorpionsoft · · Score: 5, Funny

    Maybe the prize should be a free copy of the GIMP!!??

  19. I'm hoping.. by schon · · Score: 2, Funny

    I'm hoping that This guy enters - his work just screams "professionalism".

  20. What The Gimp really needs for professionals by SpamJunkie · · Score: 3, Insightful

    ...is a new name.

    Few management types are going to approve of using a BDSM-themed program no matter how free it is.

    The attempt at making a cute raccoon-like animal the mascot doesn't help. We all know that he's wearing nothing but leather and pain below the neck.

  21. Re:Name change by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

    I don't think the problem is necessarily the association with Pulp Fiction's character, 'Gimp' ... but rather that the word gimp actually means 'disabled'.

    Why not just call it:
    'NotAsGoodAsPhotoshop' and see if that helps the adoption. Using your logic, it shouldn't matter, as it's not the meaning the words currently have, but instead the ones you want to give them.

    Seriously, the name GIMP makes it sound like the software knows that it will make you unproductive and is warning you ahead of time.

    Disclaimer:
    I'm not saying that the GIMP actually is bad ... but the name makes it sound like it is.

  22. How about a logo contest by bcarl314 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I mean really, what is that brown pointy haired beast anyway? Is it a rat, or some twisted BSD ripoff?

  23. My submission by ZackSchil · · Score: 4, Funny

    I made this submission but it was rejected outright.

    My Splash Screen

  24. Re:Name change by bbc · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Nobody is asking you to adopt the GIMP.

    Free software is often written to scratch an itch the programmers might have. So was the GIMP. If you can use it, fine; if you cannot, fine too.

    If you want to give it a different name, grab a copy off of cvs.gimp.org and distribute it under a different name. There's lots of people doing that on eBay. (Well, perhaps not lots, but both The GIMP and Project Gutenberg books have been sold on eBay under different names, presumably to draw attention away from the fact that you can get these items for free.)

  25. A serious question about Gimp. by SharpFang · · Score: 2, Insightful


    Let me put it simply: Airbrush sucks. I need something better.
    The task is preparing gray-to-heightmap images from photos for later 3D engraving using a CNC engraving machine. I "spray" more white using airbrush where the image in the background is higher, leave dark where the bottom should stay deep. The effect is very neat for small details or simple shapes. But it really sucks when it comes to large areas. The fact that the output is slightly grainy is not that bad - a single pass of blur and the "grains" are gone. Much harder is achieving bigger smoothly curved surfaces - just try to spray a regular flat gray area (using white), it's just as hard as to get a smooth gradient - you get low-depth, several pixels wide depressions, bumps etc that are very hard to remove.
    Regular "gradient" is not an option either - I need shapes much more sophisticated than regular "spherical" or "shapeburst" - maybe something like Bezier curved gradients could help...?

    Any ideas, suggestions?

    (no, don't suggest Photoshop. It does exactly the same.)

    --
    45 5F E1 04 22 CA 29 C4 93 3F 95 05 2B 79 2A B2
  26. All of them! by cocoa+moe · · Score: 2, Funny

    I guess even hardcore artists wouldnt fire up GIMP when the windowmanager starts up. Emacs could have a splash screen though. Wait - It does!

    That's the proof! VI may be e(vi)l but Emacs is worse.

  27. Here's mine by ICECommander · · Score: 2, Funny
    --
    All your Sybase are belong to us.
  28. What is it that people don't like about the GIMP? by dpol · · Score: 2, Insightful

    The GIMP seems to be the project that Slashdot users love to hate. People go on and on about the horrendous user interface, yet fail to back this up with anything substantial. Why all the hostility toward the GIMP? If you hate the interface, what is it about it that you don't like?

    I, for one, can't really see what people dislike so much about the project. The application was perfectly usable before 2.x, yet got a huge boost when 2.0 was released. The GIMP has done the most of any project when it comes to building new widgets on top of the GTK toolkit.

    The GIMP is no Photoshop. It doesn't have adjustment layers, color management, the healing brush, all the cool plug-ins for digital photographers that Photoshop CS introduced, and lots of other features. Photoshop is a remarkable application, there's no question about it, but the GIMP is eminently usable -- it's a remarkable project, and it is making great strides.

    So the next time, if you feel the need to complain, please try to be a little bit more specific and use less inflammatory language.

    --
    -- David Polberger Computer Science major, University of Lund, Sweden