Slashdot Mirror


Microsoft Sues Spammers

mclearn writes "Microsoft has filed seven more lawsuits against spammers, this time targeting those who violate the 'brown-paper wrapper' provision of the CAN-SPAM law, which sets rules for sexually oriented e-mail solicitations. Apparently these are a small part of over 120 spam-related cases Microsoft is currently litigating. With Microsoft's deep pockets, can they effectively send a resounding message to spammers?"

8 of 304 comments (clear)

  1. No. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    No.

  2. yes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    nt

  3. Re:Amazed! by ReeprFlame · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    rofl. Yes Definately. Maybe that post about the Air Force/Miltary taking specialized interest in Microsoft program debugization, etc is effecting all divisions in a positive manner.... Maybe they gave up on half of their hopeless products...

  4. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  5. Re:FP? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    Micron Technology located in Boise, ID better start treating contracted personnel better than they currently are. We are not second-class citizens.

    This will not be your only warning, but it will be your most gracious one.

  6. Re:But what about the harmful stuff? by Ramsey-07 · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    The main reason why I'm doing this is because one person whom does this means one thousand less potential spam emails out there..

    Come on guy's!! Mod me up!

  7. Re:How Microsoft can end Spam by gnuman99 · · Score: 0, Offtopic
    Evil cyborg Bill takes off a shoe and starts banging it on the podium, "I WILL BURY YOU!"

    At least he doesn't have nukes.

    Let's hope that Bush doesn't do this though...
    /me ducks

    Kim Jong Il would be funny, banging his high heels on the podium :P (yeap, he wears high heels)

  8. Re:In Korea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic
    You know... "and" is a joining word...

    And?

    The GP did join two sentences (er, immo, independent clauses) with the conjunction "and". He didn't put comma before, but English language allows that (and, yes, in punctuation rules of some other languages (er, Deutsch?), it is actually incorrect to put a comma before "and," in that case). Of course, English, as dumbed-down as it is, still doesn't allow run-on sentences, but I'm trying to bash you, not the GP. ;)