Slashdot Mirror


Search Engines for Handwritten Documents

An anonymous reader writes "Researchers at the University of Massachusetts have created a tool for automatically searching handwritten historical documents, such as the 140,000 pages that make up George Washington's personal papers in the Library of Congress. The most interesting part is that the papers are scanned versions of the originals and the search tool actually recognizes the handwritten text from these images."

17 of 172 comments (clear)

  1. Who still reads those? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    In America, handwriting is only for old people.

    1. Re:Who still reads those? by Sheepdot · · Score: 4, Funny

      I write out my checks in cursive. The other day I was admiring how pretty my cursive looked and how well it had developed from when I was in second grade and told to "TRY HARDER WEAKLING OR YOU WILL NEVER GET A JOB!". Then I realized just how ghey it was that I was enjoying the sight of it and hurridly gave it to the cashier... who was a guy... who (ick) winked at me.

  2. Doc by savagedome · · Score: 3, Funny

    Huh? Well, lets see how well it keeps up with my doctor's handwriting...

  3. This is so cool! by raehl · · Score: 2, Funny

    Somebody invented a way for computers to recognize handwriting.

    Like, so 10 years ago.

  4. Re:Hard to read! by kfg · · Score: 3, Funny

    It looks completely foreing to me. . .

    That's because it's written in a dead language.

    English.

    KFG

  5. Uh Oh by griffitts · · Score: 0, Funny

    The article points out that the handwriting reader is a Newton.

  6. Yes, but what they don't tell you... by aristus · · Score: 3, Funny

    You have to be able to handle a quill pen to use it.

    --
    Sometimes seventeen/Syllables aren't enough to/Express a complete
  7. Good Work! by CaptainCarrot · · Score: 4, Funny

    How pleafant that they've done what waf neceffary to make this happen. How did they train the foftware to recognize the quirky 18th Century handwriting?

    --
    And the brethren went away edified.
    1. Re:Good Work! by That's+Unpossible! · · Score: 4, Funny

      How pleafant that they've done what waf neceffary to make this happen.

      Personally, I think it fucks.

      --
      Ironically, the word ironically is often used incorrectly.
  8. Re:This is nothing new by js7a · · Score: 2, Funny

    Vannivar Bush described it before anyone could do it. Actualy maybe Babbage and Lovelace, Asimov, and/or probably someone like Jay Williams did a better job.

  9. Re:The search tool? by TykeClone · · Score: 2, Funny

    We could use it as a jobs program for monks. Their predecessors wrote the manuscripts, and now they could transcribe them into digital form...

    --
    A fine is a tax you pay for doing wrong and a tax is a fine you pay for doing all right.
  10. It's not OCR by Anonymous+Cowdog · · Score: 4, Funny

    It's "Pixelative Text Cognizance."

    It's different. With OCR these rays of light scan the original, translate each scanpoint to discrete RGB values, and do pattern recognition.

    With this system, they just read the discrete RGB values directly from pixels of documents scanned in with rays of light, then they do recognition of patterns. See, it's totally different.

    1. Re:It's not OCR by GigsVT · · Score: 2, Funny

      I'm not sure what's more funny, your post, or that it was modded "informative". :)

      --
      I've had enough abrasive sigs. Kittens are cute and fuzzy.
  11. National Treasure by Torgo's+Pizza · · Score: 2, Funny

    If only Nicholas Cage had this tool at his disposal, it would have made things much, much easier.

  12. Re:Umm by KillerDeathRobot · · Score: 2, Funny

    Yeah, it would have been much more "interesting" if the papers were, I don't know, read psychically by the computer or something.

    --
    Thinkin' Lincoln - a web comic of presidential proportions
  13. Re:Umm by ZagNuts · · Score: 2, Funny

    How else would it search handwritten documents? Am I missing something here?

    You write down exactly what you want to find in exactly the same handwriting that the document is written in and then it blocks scans it for what you wrote... duh.

  14. spoofing by sewagemaster · · Score: 2, Funny

    great. now people are just going to spoof documents and put pr0n or enlargement spams in the pdfs when i search for anything academic related. i'm glad i dont have that problem yet finding pdf papers via google yet.