Slashdot Mirror
GNOME Foundation Elections Results Are In
PaaChhaa writes "The GNOME Foundation membership and elections committee has announced the preliminary results of this year's elections for the board of directors. There are a few new faces this year, and Miguel de Icaza, whose candidacy was rejected last year due to late submission, is back. The run up to this year's election saw a threat of boycott, which ultimately resulted in the online publication of the foundation's financial records. Also, a heated discussion followed the posting of the list of ten questions, and the opinions of the candidates and other foundation members on these issues can be found in the foundation-list archives for the months of November and December. A notable exclusion from this year's board is GNOME's release manager Jeff Waugh. who didn't run at all."
Why the new faces point to Federico Mena? He's been working in GNOME for more time that most of the known developers.
The new president of the association: "George Walker Bush".
We told them not to use those Diebold Machines. You'd think Gnome would read Slashdot or something.
Sig it.
> 5. What unique aspect will you bring to the job?
:) -- Luis Villa
I think it is safe to say I am closer to legally blind than anyone on
the board, or running for it. That's unique, right?
My question for Slashdot customer service: Can I find this mildly funny, or does that make me some sort of Gnome Foundation fanboy...
and now back to the fallout shelter...
I hear there were some GNOME precincts that had more KDE votes than the total number of registered voters. Something smells fishy.
Well said. Spacial Nautilus the kind of thing that looks good to developers because someone put forth a proposal and mentioned the HIG enough times. Look below the surface, and you'll see HIG as the reasoning for everything, often both sides of an argument simultaneously.
I really believe its time for HIG v2, so we can see if things are improving from the user perspective, or getting worse. Nautilus on the whole is VERY confusing to the users that I have introduced to it. Just try explaining why removing the toolbar is a good thing to any reasonably minded person. All you'll get is a blank stare.
With each year's election, it just keeps getting better & better . . .
//kracker
All of the traffic simply brings more review, attention and organization to the GNOME Foundation & GNOME Development.
It's not a negative, it's a positive, either way they both push us forward towards our goals
sage francis - sick of waging war - 01 - radio commercial intro
management team
"It's the little touches that make a future solid enough to be destroyed" --William S. Bourroughs
Idunno, I like the toolbarless look, but that's just because I think its nice looking and I'm one of those people who never ever touches the toolbar. I find that the Gnome people in general don't like toolbars and tend to prefer right-click-menus. This is good for simple apps (like the file browser) but a poor decision for more complicated apps.
Still, I agree that the "new window for each folder" thing is a bad idea. Why not follow FireFox's success and go with a rocker/radial approach? Middle-click = open in new window, rclick + scrollup = up one level, stuff like that? Just have the context-menu list the rocker gestures and hotkeys alongside the command names.
Complain a lot, write bugreports, cross your fingers and wait a release or two and they might add back a useable textinput/typeahead support. In the past Gnome developers have frustrated me quite a lot, especially in the switch from Gnome1.4 to Gnome2.0 where a lot of usefull features have gone missing, however most of the needed features have found there way back again sooner or later. So I have good hopes that they will fix the filedialog too in the future, just give it a bit time. Gnome developers tend to overshoot their goal of simplicity, it just takes some time to find the right balance between 'crowded', 'simply good' and 'too simple'.
### I can't understand why they won't even offer the old one as an option, except that it would mean admitting that they might be wrong.
They follow more or less the principal of doing it right, instead of flooding the screen with options. And as basically everybody will agree the old dialog was just plain awfull (beside the tab-completion, which was really good), so I think they prefered to dump it completly to have it finally dead, instead of dragging it around for another few releases. Until they get proper typeahead implemented, it will be of course a bit painfull, since 'Ctrl-L' is really a rather ugly hack, however it gets the job done and the dialog is already much more pleasent to use with the mouse, so the damage isn't that big and time will most likly fix the rest.
And where, in the dialog, does it tell me about that?
For all the Gnome guys seem to love these human interface guidelines, they seem to forget the single biggest item when making a GUI:
Any item the user is to be able to manipulate should be represented on the UI
Every time they fail to follow that, and every time they get called on it, they come up with some "Well, just press CTRL-ALT-META-LSHIFT-Q to enable that".
So a user is to pour over the documentation, reading every bit of it to find all these key combinations that are NOT indicated on the UI itself.
And this, somehow, is going to make it easier for the non-31337 user to use...
www.eFax.com are spammers