Alek's Christmas Lights Webcam is Back
millert continues "You can Email Santa page and he does respond to Email inquiries. Alek is already thinking ahead for Christmas 2005 ...
The picture quality on his cool webcam pictures seems much better than a run-of-the-mill webcam; the image quality under low-light conditions is surprisingly good. In question D-5 of his FAQ, he says he has it under non-disclosure and all he can say is that it is a "640x480 pixel image using 1/2.7" sensor - size matters when it comes to pixels" and he is right about that -- this is one of the reasons the pictures of Mars from the Spirit Rover were so good. Even more interesting is the info in the jpegs' EXIF header (as displayed by ImageMagick's identify utility. There's quite a bit of information in there, including a reference to a company that provided IP-based video security for the 2004 Olympics and a comment saying 'do NOT release to marketing droids' Fortunately, this is Slashdot.
Slashdot crushed it in 2002 and 2003 -- will the 3rd time be the charm for Alek?"
One; I hate xmas.
Two: I hate xmas lights.
Three: The site is painful to see. Marquees, blinking, random wild text. GAH!
Four: I hate xmas.
In this post, he blatantly challenges the power of the /. effect with the words "Bring it on baby".
That's motivation enough for me to "accidentally" hit F5 every 20 seconds or so.
Let's bring it on "babies".
An Indian-American Hindu committed to non-violent thought/speech/action alarmed by the global explosion of radical Islam
Well, once again the U.S. proves to be ahead of the pack ... we have never had any interest in copying you. For some reason.
The higher the technology, the sharper that two-edged sword.