Slashdot Mirror


Labels Trying New CD Copy Prevention Systems

bAdministrator writes "What if a CD copy-protection system was developed, which did not compromise sound quality nor cause compatibility problems, and still allowed for your 'rights' to make a limited amount of personal copies (*.DRM)? UK-based company First 4 Internet (F4i) claims to have pulled this off with their 'eXtended Copy Protection' (XCP) system; 'The disc will present itself as a CD-ROM to PCs, a Mac CD-ROM to Mac computers, a VCD to DVD players and CDDA disc to audio CD players. This multifunctional disc format offers full playability and therefore greater flexibility without lowering protection levels.' and 'By using a range of methodologies, including the construction of multiple protection layers, limiting the player accessibility to the provided player software, and encapsulating the red book audio content, XCP® successfully protects the content from unauthorised copying.'"

5 of 520 comments (clear)

  1. Re:And on a Linux PC by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Troll

    On a Linux PC, it presents itself as kiddie porn.

  2. Cool by Lanzaa · · Score: 0, Troll

    This sounds like something that will take a while to hack. But once it is hacked we will have a new open format that can work like a cd-rom audio and stuff. Also we will have a cool new protection system.

  3. Re:And on a Linux PC by pdpTrojan · · Score: -1, Troll

    That's because Linux is broken.
    It has nothing to do with the CD.

  4. Re:they always claim that by Bitmanhome · · Score: 0, Troll

    You can indeed do whatever you want with the slug of plastic you purchased. But you have no right to copy the music; that right is owned by someone else. These technologies simply bring common practice into sync with the law.

    --
    Not that this wasn't entirely predictable.
  5. Re:Tell me why I should care? by westlake · · Score: -1, Troll
    The young girl in question ceratinly is guilty of the crime, even though you suggest that she isn't.

    It simply strikes me as cynical and self-serving when you protest the RIAA's pursuit of the "young girls" who support your download habit, but take no responsibility for helping to get them into trouble.