Slashdot Mirror
Is Apache 2.0 Worth the Switch for PHP?
An anonymous reader writes "It seems like some of the members of the Apache Software Foundation are a little angry with the PHP Community because they don't recommend using Apache 2.0 with PHP. Since PHP is installed on half of all Apache servers this is a major issue for them. A number of high-profile PHP community members such as John Coggeshall and Chris Shiflett have blogged about this decision in light of a recent posting by Apache Software Foundation Member Rich Bowen which called PHP's anti-Apache2 stance FUD. Is there any real reason for the PHP community to start recommending Apache 2.0, especially when the 1.3.x series of Apache is rock solid and proven? Note Rich did later commend PHP for being a great product, so it's not all flames."
I'm a little ticked off that news like this makes the front page, yet release of mod_perl 2.0 years in the making, on Dec 12, is yet to be mentioned. I am more than certain that someone must have submitted a story on it in the Apache section.
"American Presidential debates are rigged [opendebates.org]."
Yeah, big deal. So are the elections.
If someone says he and his monkey have nothing to hide, they almost certainly do.
Duke Nukem Forever will be released in January, didn't you read the news yesterday?
Your joke is obsolete.