Slashdot Mirror


Quake Changes Earth's Rotation, Moves Islands

kernel panic attack writes "This week's deadly Asian Quake and Tsunami may have been so powerful, that it changed the rate of Earth's rotation. In a Reuters article, a NASA geophysicist theorizes that the quake compacted the Earth enough to speed up the planet's rotation by 3 microseconds. A second article says the quake moved undersea tectonic plates by up to 98 feet, shifting islands near Sumatra out to sea an unknown distance. Also, a USGS team wants images from commercial satellite operators to help pinpoint coastline damage. Lastly, an interesting article from the Australian Spaceguard Survey about the need for a Tsunami warning system in the Indian Ocean. The author comments that tsunami warnings may not help much, as people often flock to the coastline to see the giant waves." The current estimated death toll is now nearly 70,000; Amazon and Google, among others, have added front-page links to simplify donating to the disaster relief effort.

16 of 917 comments (clear)

  1. Apple Too by ack154 · · Score: 5, Informative

    Probably not as much traffic as Amazon or Google, but Apple also has also modified their front page to offer multiple relief links. Even the four boxes at the bottom have been changed to different organizations.

    1. Re:Apple Too by TopShelf · · Score: 5, Informative

      Don't know why they couldn't put the link in the article summary, but the Amazon donation link is in the sig below:

      --
      Stop by my site where I write about ERP systems & more
  2. Re:Makes me wonder by Enigma_Man · · Score: 4, Informative

    You're right. Earthquakes didn't change the earth's orbit, they changed the earth's rate of rotation, which is a completely different animal.

    -Jesse

    --
    Nothing says "unprofessional job" like wrinkles in your duct tape.
  3. Donate some money! by immerrath · · Score: 5, Informative
    I submitted a story with a link to a CNN page that lists organizations accepting aid for the Tsunami/Quake hit people, but it got rejected.

    I myself donated $500 to AmeriCares which seems to be a fairly reputable charity, and I'm only a poor graduate student.

    Those of you who are well off enough, please, donate as much as you can to your favorite charity.

    I quote John Donne:

    "No man is an island, entire of itself; every man is a piece of the continent, a part of the main. If a clod be washed away by the sea, Europe is the less, as well as if a promontory were, as well as if a manor of thy friend's or of thine own were. Any man's death diminishes me because I am involved in mankind; and therefore never send to know for whom the bell tolls; it tolls for thee."

  4. Re:What is the impact? by Soft · · Score: 5, Informative
    What will be the impact of this on geostationnary satellites?

    No more than usual perturbations, I suppose: geostationary satellites already tend to drift a little and need stationkeeping.

    On the measuring of time?

    None. The second is defined relative to quantum levels in the caesium atom, that won't change. As for keeping up with the calendar, the Earth's rotation already has small variations; since 3 microseconds is roughly 1/300 second, we might have to subtract a leap second next July or December. (E.g. straight from 2005-12-31/23:59:58 to 2006-01-01/0:00:00 UTC.)

    On the GPS?

    Don't know, but don't think the resolution is that precise.

  5. It's all about angular momentum by PhysicsGenius · · Score: 4, Informative
    Angular momentum is conserved and is calculated by L = Iw where I is the rotational inertia, w is the angular velocity and L is the constant product. So if I goes up (and I will show in a minute how that happens), w must go down.

    I, the rotational inertia, is calculated different ways for different geometries. A long stick held by the end has a larger I than the same stick held by the center, for instance. Another example is a sphere, like the Earth, rotating on an axis. If it suddenly puts out a long arm, that's going to increase its rotation inertia considerably, decreasing its angular velocity. Lifting up a whole region by a few inches could easily do that.

  6. Re:Over what time? by arkanes · · Score: 4, Informative

    You know what one rotation of the earth is called, right? One of those is 3 microseconds faster.

  7. Micro gravity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative

    The Earth is modeled in Physics classes as if the density is consistent throughout, so that they use a simplistic geocentric model as if all of the mass were at the center. This is not how The Earth is actually configured. For doing satelites one must models The Earth with micro-gravity elements, where masses are charted and denser areas have different effects based upon their sizes and locations. It is well known, for example, that under the South Atlantic Ocean there is a larger force of gravity.


    And so if there were a shift in some dense part of the mantle or the core where it went farther into The Earth (or farther away) it would change the rotational speed because of the conservation of angular momentum. Think of a child spinning on a swing. When the child pulls in his arms, the child spins faster. When the child puts her arms out, she spins slower. Same with The Earth.
  8. weather changes rotation 1000 times more by peter303 · · Score: 4, Informative

    The length of a day fluctuates two milliseconds, or a thousand times more, over the course of a year. Most of this attributed to the annual pattern of ocean storms.

  9. Re:Indian ocean isnt the only place one is needed by arivanov · · Score: 5, Informative

    Fsck, here went my moderation.

    I have been on that island (it is worth visiting while it lasts). Nearly killed myself aquaplaning in a tropical rainstorm on a road with 400+ meter cliff going into the sea on the right and 400+ cliff going up towards the volcano in question on the left.

    Anyway, on subject:

    It has a US Geological Survey run GPS station network every several hundred meters or so in some places do detect any movement and try to predict the next eruption. There will be a fair warning on this one. It is a question if anyone will dare to use that warning wisely which I doubt.

    That is the good bit.

    The bad bit is that compared to a worst case La Palma scenario the tsunami from 2004 Christmas earthquake will be a child's game in a puddle. The predicted worst case tsunami for La Palma is 800m at the start, 100+m at Marroco and Capo Verde, 30+m at Lisbon, Rio and the Caribean, 10+ m along the entire East Coast of the US including New York and Ireland and 5+ at the South coast of the UK. The death toll if there will be no evacuation will be in the tens of millions if not hundreds. That is the worst case scenario which is if it slides the same way it slid 1+ million years ago when the current north caldera has formed (it is the largest volcanic caldera formed by a landslide on the planet - 30km+ diameter). Even if it is a fraction of that it is still really scary.

    Just to make things worse is that current models are that a landslide is likely to follow one of the next 3-5 eruptions and it erupts every 20 years on average.

    And worst part is that it has not erupted for nearly 33 years now so the next eruption is likely to be bigger then usual.

    --
    Baker's Law: Misery no longer loves company. Nowadays it insists on it
    http://www.sigsegv.cx/
  10. Satellite Images by KrackHouse · · Score: 5, Informative

    The guys over at India's department of Space, National Remote Sensing Agency posted a link to an 8MB powerpoint slide of satellite images of the affected areas which effectively crippled their server due to the demand. Some of us readers over at Tsunamihelp.blogspot.com mananged to get some mirrors up here and here. I also created a .torrent which includes the images(in a PowerPoint presentation) as well as a bunch of footage of the tsunami that has been going around bringing down servers. Grab the .Torrent. Please grab the .torrent unless you're really lazy, the other mirrors will probably be tried first by those who really need the data. More seeders needed for that .torrent, leave your BT clients running please.

    --
    What if Digg added local news and a Slashdot inspired comment karma system? ---
    http://houndwire.com
  11. Another estimate and what that means for Satalites by StillNeedMoreCoffee · · Score: 4, Informative

    Another estimate for the time change here.

    http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/local/chi-041 22 80221dec28,1,6119845.column

    (some useless registration required). I quote from the article.
    "Incredibly, the magnitude 9.0 earthquake that struck off Sumatra on Sunday morning caused a vertical displacement of so much material that the rotation period of the Earth has been permanently altered. By a tiny but measurable amount, the Earth is now rotating more quickly on its axis, and the 24-hour day is now one ten-thousandth second shorter.That's the result of calculations based on preliminary data made by Oak Park astronomer Dr. Leslie M. Golden. It's analogous to the increase in rotational speed that a twirling ice skater experiences when he or she draws in their arms. It is estimated that during the Sumatran quake, a block of material roughly 600 miles in length and 100 miles in width fell 30 feet closer to the Earth's axis of rotation. The planet has responded by rotating more rapidly, albeit ever so slightly, and our 24-hour days are now one ten-thousandth second shorter." by Tom Skilling.

    If it is one ten-thousandth of a second then it works out to have more effect.

    Doing the math for 1/10,000 of a sec/day:

    so 10,000 days = 1 second

    10000/365 = 27.39 years

    So in 27.39 years we loose a second.

    Diameter of earth 12,756 km or circumference 24,902 mi or 131,482,560 ft (appox at equator)

    One second of the day means a radial distance of

    24hr * 60 min *60 sec = 86400 seconds /day

    131,482,560 (feet / day) / 86400 (sec/day) = 1521.79 feet/sec

    at the equator (old 24 hour day)
    or is what the eath turns in one second

    or if there is change of 1521.79 feet of alignment in 27.39 years. or 55.56 feet / year.
    or:

    55.56 (feet/yr) * 12 in/foot = 666.72in/yr(bad omen here)

    or 666.72 (in/year) / 365 days (aprox) = 1.8 in /day difference.

    55.56 (feet /year) / 12 months = 4.63 (ft/month)

    This is a different estimate than Nasas but might be thought of as an upper bound until things
    can be calculated more precisely.

    Satelite's orbits will not change their period because of the change in the earths rotational speed. Geosynchronous satalites will slip out of synchronisity and need to use fuel to change their orbits, reducing their effective life as we have no way of replenishing fuel in geosynchronous orbit (around 22k miles out I think).

    This will be devistating for GPS and will require immediate upgrades/repossitioning to those systems.

    Can you imagine a year from now a precision guided missle landing 55 feet to the left. and each day
    an additional 55 feet more. Frightning. I image the military has stopped using GPS guided weapons
    until that can be corrected.

    Now if you correct those numbers for the Nasa estimate.

    3/100,000 instead of 1/10,000 then the

    or 3,000,000 days to get one second then.

    or 8219 years

    1521.79 (ft/sec) / 8319 (years/sec) =.1829 (ft/year) .1829 ft * 12 inches = 2.195 in/year

    much less of an adjustment or a threat to satelite's positions or positioning satelites.

    (check the math, who knows if I did it right)

    Just an intellectual exercise to assess the effect. Enjoy

  12. 100% goes straight to the Red Cross by Schlemphfer · · Score: 5, Informative
    It says right on Amazon's front page, "100% of your donation will go to the American Red Cross."

    So it looks like Amazon.com is not only giving this front-page billing, they are also personally paying the credit card transaction fee, in effect losing at least a couple pennies for each dollar contributed.

    In other words, they can't be faulted one iota.

    --
    I'm generally "Interesting," "Insightful," and even "Funny" here. What the hell happens to me at parties?
    1. Re:100% goes straight to the Red Cross by snorklewacker · · Score: 5, Informative

      As I recall, the Red Cross is sitting on a huge pile of cash for 9/11 victims because they don't want to make them millionaires and the government said they can't use the money for relief efforts that aren't 9/11 related.

      I doubt this -- the Red Cross has never earmarked funds for specific disasters before, refuses to do so now, and the government has absolutely zero power to tell the Red Cross what it can do with its own funds. They are a private agency, and they are absolutely fanatical about their independence.

      The Red Cross has also never paid out directly to victims. The only direct assistance they do give is in the form of vouchers for food, clothing, shelter, and related items.

      So you don't recall anything except what some other very wrong person made up or just repeated from some other mistaken or lying individual.

      --
      I am no longer wasting my time with slashdot
  13. Re:Let's not make fun.. by stupidfoo · · Score: 4, Informative

    Awww... poor little eurotrash. You seem to think that the only organization fit to distribute funds are governmental orgs and that the only funds that count are ones that are gathered through coercion (taxes).

    Noticeably absent from the anti-american salon article are numbers for private charitable giving (which dwarf any country no matter how you slice - Hell, between 1992 and 1998 the US sent almost $2.9 billion in PRIVATE AID to CUBA!) and US military expenditures (no, we're not discussing Iraq) that are solely for humanitarian purposes.

    We're moving a f'en carrier group into the region for support and search and rescue, you think that's cheap?

    With 300 million people you donated ODA $6.9 billion in foreign aid in 1997.

    http://www.usaid.gov/fani/ch06/privateaid.htm
    The actual total of official development assistance and private giving was $44.5 billion, or 0.45 percent of U.S. gross national income - and that still doesn't account for military humanitarian spending

    LOL: In 2000 U.S. universities and colleges gave more to developing countries in foreign scholarships than Australia, Belgium, Norway, Spain, and Switzerland each gave in ODA.

    What were you saying again?

    And, btw, the current numbers for ODA funding are:
    Australia - $1.2 Billion
    France - $7.3 Billion
    US - $16.2 Billion (a 23% increase over last year under the evil Bushilter!)

  14. Amazon waiving normal honor system fees by Urgo · · Score: 4, Informative

    Normally when a person or entity uses the amazon honor system for donations/payments amazon takes a nice cut of the pie. I emailed them today to check if they did the same thing for the disaster relief and apparently they aren't!

    I included both emails below:

    TO: Amazon
    FROM: Urgo
    I have a question about the disaster relief donation page that you have setup on amazon.com. I know normally with the amazon honor system amazon gets a cut of all the donations. Is amazon taking a cut of the money in this case or is all of the money people donate going right to the red cross?

    FROM: Amazon
    TO: Urgo
    Thanks for writing to us at Amazon.com.

    Please rest assured that all the donated money will go to the Red Cross to help victims of tragedies in southern Asia, India, and Africa.

    Please know that Amazon.com is waiving its usual fees.

    --
    Belive in Technology and AMAZE yourself. -- RIP ZDTV/TechTV