Slashdot Mirror


VoIP Predictions for 2005

phoneboy writes "There was much progress in the VoIP world in 2004, though not as much as Voxilla predicted exactly one year ago. Will 2005 accelerate the pace of change? We at Voxilla think so. In our One Look Back, Two Steps Forward article, we take a peek back at our predicitions we made in 2004 and don the swami cap as we look boldly into the near future of the phone."

15 of 142 comments (clear)

  1. Telephony over TCP/IP over phone line by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Simplicity at its best!

  2. Re:Progress by Will_Malverson · · Score: 3, Insightful
    There was progress made in the availability but not a lot made in sound quality. My friend has a VOIP phone and when he calls my landline it sounds like he's calling from the bottom of a bucket. Keeps dropping out too.

    And ironically enough, that's where VoIP could shine -- imagine transmitting your voice with 128kbps MP3 encoding. It might not matter quite so much for personal use, but it would kick ass for speaker-phone teleconferencing.
  3. Mirror by FinchWorld · · Score: 5, Informative

    Just incase... ...Here

    --
    "I may be full of crap about this game, and I may be wrong, and that's fine." -Jack Thompson
  4. Personal Experience: by grasshoppa · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Well, while it may not mean much in a grand scheme of things, I can tell you that I have plans of setting up 3 offices with a VoIP system, due mainly to the cost of the competitors.

    I will be using asterisk on linux. While not as feature rich as some of the other companies' offerings, it does have the benefit of being cheaper.

    By an order of magnatude.

    So, my prediction is this: If voice companies try to treat this as another cash cow, OSS alternatives ( like asterisk ) will boom, in both features and use.

    --
    Mod me down with all of your hatred and your journey towards the dark side will be complete!
  5. One prediction that I hope doesn't come true by ShatteredDream · · Score: 4, Insightful

    VoIP providers will be expected to conform to CALEA. The federal government will try to get VoIP providers to make their software fully wiretapable which will do one of two things probably. It'll either put open source developers using encryption at odds with federal policy or require that we all expose ourselves online.

    You know it's sad when your father, someone who spent 27 years in the U.S military and federal law enforcement looks at you dead seriously and says that generally speaking the biggest lie you'll hear from the federal government is: "we're from the government, we're hear to help you." I'll never forget my dad reading about Carnivore and realizing that his reaction to it was probably a good example of why he retired from federal law enforcement under him. How we cheered when Carnivore proved to be a failure.

    1. Re:One prediction that I hope doesn't come true by lordkuri · · Score: 3, Interesting

      How does CALEA factor in when the connection doesn't touch the POTS system though?

      Seriously, if they can require *any* VOIP to be tappable, where does it stop? Email? web traffic? IM?

  6. Re:Progress by jrcamp · · Score: 4, Informative

    Why? As I recall, MP3, ogg vorbis, and the like aren't meant for compressing voice data. They're much better at dealing with music.

    There are codecs specifically meant for speech, such as http://www.speex.org/.

  7. I'm happy... by SuperDuG · · Score: 4, Interesting
    I use Vonage here at home. The $15 plan seems to be more than enough (seeing as I'm obviously not popular enough to justify the unlimited plan). Granted the quality can be rather harsh sometimes, but thats because I'm using most of my bandwidth for something else.

    If you give vonage 128kpbs both directions it will be the quality of a cell phone. Not absolutely perfect, but well within the range of acceptable. I've spent hours at a time on the phone with vonage and let me tell you, its leaps and bounds above the good old days of dialpad.com.

    So will VoIP be a big player in `05, you bet your ass it will. Considering mainly that landline telephones cost so much more and offer very little justification for it. With VoIP and cell phones, I predict a death for standard copper land lines by at least 2015.

    --
    Ignore the "p2p is theft" trolls, they're just uninformed
    1. Re:I'm happy... by JPriest · · Score: 3, Informative

      Vonage offers 30, 50, and 90Kbits/sec. I use the 50 Kbps setting and I don't notice much difference over my land line. I have to say that I am also pretty happy with their service. My phone bill was $58/mo with no long distance, I save $43/mo with vonage, that alone covers the cost of my cable modem.

      --
      Saying Java is nice because it works on all OS's is like saying that anal sex is nice because it works on all genders.
  8. Turnkey opportunity by timothy · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Having seen smart people struggle to get Asterisk working (cool a system as it is!), I imagine there would be quite a brisk market for a pre-configured, low-power box running asterisk ready for the user to plug in some custom messages, and / or rely on existing generic ones. That is, something truly plug-and-play, providing your have at least one POTS line to which it can be connected.

    Such a system needn't be *cheap* exactly in order to be quite a bit less expensive than typical PBXes, which are usually overkill for small businesses, as well as for any but the most elaborate homes. (Should be doable for a few hundred dollars, I'd guess.)

    Or am I just missing that someone is selling such a beast already?

    --
    jrnl: http://tinyurl.com/c2l8yr / foes: http://tinyurl.com/ckjno5
    1. Re:Turnkey opportunity by JPriest · · Score: 5, Informative
      Perhaps not exactly the pre-packages solution you are looking for, but you may want to check out Asterisk Management Portal, the OSS non commercial version of Voxbox (with screenshots) and Flash Operator Panel, it runs on AMP and gives a realtime look at call activity through the PBX.

      I believe Voxbox, from a software point, does pretty much what you are looking for, now if you can just find someone to package it with small hardware platform for a decent price...

      --
      Saying Java is nice because it works on all OS's is like saying that anal sex is nice because it works on all genders.
  9. Re:Progress by wfberg · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Why? As I recall, MP3, ogg vorbis, and the like aren't meant for compressing voice data. They're much better at dealing with music.

    There are codecs specifically meant for speech, such as http://www.speex.org/.


    Speex specializes in low bandwidth voice.

    If you have 128kbps to throw around, speex is overkill. MP3 may have been designed to compress music especially well, but it's held up quite well as an all-round codec. (Though there might not be much masking noises - like loud beats that obscure other sounds - in speech, the spectral range is quite limited, and MP3 picks up on that.)

    And who says VOIP is for voice only? It's not uncommon for me to want to let a friend hear some music that's playing on mtv or my computer. With speech-optimized codecs, it comes out crap on the other end. Even on-hold music sounds mostly like silence and some blips on a cellphone. In fact, I've contemplated using the GSM codec to identify the speech part of music, so I can use it to produce "karaoke"/instrumental versions of music..

    I wonder if there's a software upgrade that enables telephone companies to use 64/56kbps ogg (though obviously mono) codecs instead of G.711/G.723.

    --
    SCO employee? Check out the bounty
  10. Vonage prices have been dropping... by PornMaster · · Score: 4, Informative

    I signed up with Vonage a bit under a year ago. When I did, it was $34.99/mo for unlimited US&Can calling. Twice since then, they've dropped it $5/mo. I don't know if it's a matter of their costs dropping with economies of scale or to compete with the cable companies rolling out their own, but I must say that I love the reduction in cost without any reduction in wonderful service.

  11. Predictions by Animats · · Score: 4, Interesting
    • Spam moves to VoIP Press 1 for a Rolex, 2 for Vioxx...
    • Homeland Security and the FBI get involved. We'll hear from the wiretapping people again.
    • The cable guys try to take over. Talk for an hour, get a free movie.
    • VoIP over 3G Technically stupid, but likely.
    • Power over Ethernet meets VoIP Phones stay up, until the UPS dies.
    • Ringtones for VoIP phones Music for the office.
    • First VoIP viruses Coming soon to a phone near you.
    1. Re:Predictions by Laebshade · · Score: 3, Interesting
      Power over Ethernet meets VoIP Phones stay up, until the UPS dies.
      Stop there a second. It's been done.
      • All models offer straightforward user customization capabilities to meet changing needs
      • Cisco IP Phones 7971G-GE and 7970G support IEEE 802.3af PoE
      • Cisco IP Phones 7970G, 7960G, 7940G, 7910G, 7910G + SW, 7912G, 7905G and 7902G can accept Cisco pre-standard Power over Ethernet (PoE) from a card integrated with a Catalyst switch or a Catalyst in-line power patch panel
      • Cisco IP Phone 7971G-GE includes two 10/100/1000BaseT switch interfaces to ensure quality of service (QoS)
      • Cisco IP Phones 7970G, 7960G, 7940G, 7910G + SW, and 7912G include two-port 10/100BaseT switch interfaces to ensure quality of service (QoS)
      • Cisco Wireless IP Phone 7920 delivers up to six extensions, wireline voice quality, small form factor, standard and extended Li-ion battery options, menu driven graphical user interface, and inter-campus secure-seamless roaming
      • Cisco IP Phone 7902G, is a cost-effective, single-line, entry-level IP phone addressing the voice communications needs of a lobby, laboratory, manufacturing floor, or hallway--or other areas where only basic calling capability is required
      We have the Cisco IP Phones 7940 series here at work. They're supposed to stay up a while from our UPS (but they don't, UPS might be faulty). Last time our power went out we were able to use our phones for 15 minutes.