Supercomputers - Does the Cabling Matter?
papaia asks: "Having watched, for a while, the development in the area of high-density server hardware solutions (i.e. blade servers), like IBM's 'top gun', and their increased presence in Data Centers, I have been wondering if anybody has had any experience (thus comments) in regards to how important - in such highly priced solutions - is (or could be) the [always neglected] cabling, connecting the servers. One such comment caught my attention, in this regard. Slashdot, how important is the server cabling infrastructure in your Data Centers, and how do you resolve the cable management aspect of it?"
any experience (thus comments) in regards to how important - in such highly priced solutions - is (or could be) the [always neglected] cabling
.....you werent even really trying
im sure you could fit more parentheses and brackets in there!
$500 for a 6 foot audio cable? Your friend prolly got some cheap low-end swill. :-)
/. thread has a few other interesting examples, including the one above.
Here's the real good stuff. I wish I weren't making this shit up.
This previous
Me? I just hook everything up using lamp cord.
I've seen 10 meg go over a barbed wire fence...
So that's how you're supposed to handle physical security for your workstation. My new hero.
Direct away from face when opening.
Windows (TM) Supercomputer Uptime: 23:59:5BSOD!
No, yourself.
It matters how many wires are in the cable. A cable is a mass of wires, and the more wires, the more data can be sent at once. Hence the sucktasticness of phone lines as internet connections with their few measly threads of single wires. Now, a broadband cable line has a whole mess of wires in it. A T1 or T3 line has an unfathomable number of seperate cables twisted upon each other within it. It's not the wire that matters, it's the number of them.