HardOCP Declares Win vs. Infinium Labs
Bill Bagel writes "Many of us have watched Infinium Labs' attempt to quash HardOCP's First Amendment right for the last year. HardOCP wrote this story on the Infinium Labs CEO, Tim Roberts, that was based on his own resume and some Google research. IL sued HardOCP, a home-based webpage business for $20M in Florida, and HardOCP fought back in a Federal Court in Texas for a declaratory judgment. HardOCP basically won when Infinium Labs finally gave up the fight citing great expenses involved in fighting the declaratory suit. The judge's order can be found here." The Cliff's Notes version can be found on WhereisPhantom.com.
Anyhow, congrats to Kyle & HardOCP.
Who signed that order? I could have been anyone: Jesus The Christuuuuuuuu, Jed Clampetuuuuuuuu, Justin Timberlakeuuuuuuu? Who knows...?
NMG
...we can get a similar judgement with SCO.
Yes sir... 2005 is shaping up to be a GREAT year!
"...Well, there's egg and bacon; egg sausage and bacon; egg and spam; egg bacon and spam; egg bacon sausage and spam..."
I for one, welcome our new OCP overlords.
A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
If HardOCP countersues to recoup legal fees it will result in an infinite loop, since the countersuit itself will result in more legal fees that will need to be recouped with a countersuit.
Who signed that order? I could have been anyone: Jesus The Christuuuuuuuu, Jed Clampetuuuuuuuu, Justin Timberlakeuuuuuuu? Who knows...?
The Great Chtulhuuuuuuuuu knows...
You can't take the sky from me...
Don't you mean an Infinium Loop?
[
Wazzzzaaaaaaaap!!!
-Laz
for putting publicly available but apparently embarassing information in a highly visible place.
Are they as irrelevent now as SCO will be after they lose their case? Yes. Do I still want to hear about it when it happens so I can laugh at them? Yes. Yes I do.
To Infinium Labs: Ha ha!
The enemies of Democracy are
Well, yes I can, because that's covered separately under the "freedom of the press" provision...right?
Hate to burst your bubble, Matlock, but it's all the same "provision". It's called the 1st Amendment.
"Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press, or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances."
"This calls for a very special blend of psychology and extreme violence" - Vyvyan "The Young Ones"