Slashdot Mirror


HardOCP Declares Win vs. Infinium Labs

Bill Bagel writes "Many of us have watched Infinium Labs' attempt to quash HardOCP's First Amendment right for the last year. HardOCP wrote this story on the Infinium Labs CEO, Tim Roberts, that was based on his own resume and some Google research. IL sued HardOCP, a home-based webpage business for $20M in Florida, and HardOCP fought back in a Federal Court in Texas for a declaratory judgment. HardOCP basically won when Infinium Labs finally gave up the fight citing great expenses involved in fighting the declaratory suit. The judge's order can be found here." The Cliff's Notes version can be found on WhereisPhantom.com.

15 of 234 comments (clear)

  1. Judge's signature by mr.henry · · Score: 5, Funny
    It's worth RTFA just to see the judge's funky signature. I guess I can make out the first name, but I don't see how you can get "KAPLAN" from a lowercase "a" followed by 13 "u"s.

    Anyhow, congrats to Kyle & HardOCP.

    1. Re:Judge's signature by brilinux · · Score: 2, Funny

      Perhaps he was dictating!

    2. Re:Judge's signature by GoofyBoy · · Score: 5, Funny

      Maybe he just wanted to see if anyone would notice.

      http://www.zug.com/pranks/credit/

      --
      The surprise isn't how often we make bad choices; the surprise is how seldom they defeat us.
    3. Re:Judge's signature by raeler · · Score: 2, Funny

      It's a play on Gooooooooooooogle, he just forgot to add PWND at the end of his sig.

      --
      This is my post. See sig above ^
    4. Re:Judge's signature by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      I figure he just started to have a seizure.

    5. Re:Judge's signature by Rethcir · · Score: 2, Funny

      Dating yourself? Well at least you'll always know when your date will put out. (OT thread, but fun)

  2. This is exactly what I was going to say by umrgregg · · Score: 3, Funny

    Who signed that order? I could have been anyone: Jesus The Christuuuuuuuu, Jed Clampetuuuuuuuu, Justin Timberlakeuuuuuuu? Who knows...?

    --
    NMG
  3. Good! Now if only... by Chordonblue · · Score: 3, Funny

    ...we can get a similar judgement with SCO.

    Yes sir... 2005 is shaping up to be a GREAT year!

    --
    "...Well, there's egg and bacon; egg sausage and bacon; egg and spam; egg bacon and spam; egg bacon sausage and spam..."
  4. Re:OCP by ackthpt · · Score: 1, Funny
    It's only a matter of time before OCP takes over and starts running our cities like a corporation! Next they'll experiment with convicts in order to build cyborgs. We must stop them now before all our rights belong to them!

    I for one, welcome our new OCP overlords.

    --

    A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
  5. Re: infinite loop by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    If HardOCP countersues to recoup legal fees it will result in an infinite loop, since the countersuit itself will result in more legal fees that will need to be recouped with a countersuit.

  6. fhtang! by Scrameustache · · Score: 2, Funny

    Who signed that order? I could have been anyone: Jesus The Christuuuuuuuu, Jed Clampetuuuuuuuu, Justin Timberlakeuuuuuuu? Who knows...?

    The Great Chtulhuuuuuuuuu knows...

    --

    You can't take the sky from me...

  7. Re: infinite loop by Speare · · Score: 4, Funny
    If HardOCP countersues to recoup legal fees it will result in an infinite loop...

    Don't you mean an Infinium Loop?

    --
    [ .sig file not found ]
  8. To my homey J Kaplannnnn by Lazarus_Bitmap · · Score: 1, Funny

    Wazzzzaaaaaaaap!!!

    --
    -Laz .:change is inevitable -- growth is optional:.
  9. Dude, they were suing people by Chris+Burke · · Score: 3, Funny

    for putting publicly available but apparently embarassing information in a highly visible place.

    Are they as irrelevent now as SCO will be after they lose their case? Yes. Do I still want to hear about it when it happens so I can laugh at them? Yes. Yes I do.

    To Infinium Labs: Ha ha!

    --

    The enemies of Democracy are
  10. Re:Rights? by flosofl · · Score: 2, Funny

    Well, yes I can, because that's covered separately under the "freedom of the press" provision...right?

    Hate to burst your bubble, Matlock, but it's all the same "provision". It's called the 1st Amendment.

    "Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press, or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances."

    --
    "This calls for a very special blend of psychology and extreme violence" - Vyvyan "The Young Ones"