Slashdot Mirror
Nanotech Research Works Toward Artificial Muscles
An anonymous reader writes "Nanotech researchers are developing artificial muscles that convert chemical energy to mechanical energy. This ambitious project aims at making an artificial muscles from conducting polymers and carbon nanotubes that are chemically powered, like natural muscles, and exceed the force generation, contraction and speed of their natural counterpart. This work will lead to advanced limbs for amputees and robots."
Strong muscles without the need to exercise. Sounds like a geek's dream come true huh? Except that one must keep in mind certain dangly appendages that could be torn off if you aren't careful with those new bulging biceps. And what about joints, could they handle the extra stress of markedly increased muscle strength? Like you go to pick up your car and your arms pop out of their sockets. Ouch.
I Am My Own Worst Enemy
Myomer. It must be called Myomer.
Yes, I'm odd. This is the first thing that came to my mind. What if someone wanted to add a limb? I'm pretty sure it could be possible. We could construct a framework of artificial bone, build the artificial muscles and tendons, implant artificial nerves, and (much like when a person gets a limb transplant) graft it into the nervous system.
I'm no expert in this field - I'm merely speculating. Feel free to totally bash my idea. Is this even possible, though?
I am scientifically inaccurate.
We have the technology. We have the capability to make the world's first Bionic man. Steve Austin will be that man. Better than he was before. Better . . . stronger . . . faster.
Clones are people two.
Now the zillionaires don't have to take steroids to cheat! And they can afford to be early-adopters of muscle upgrade procedures!
This sig is my best one.
those muscle heads when they start pumping iron and they hit an Insufficient Memory error?
Few issues which still need to be resolved:
(a) How to place and grow nanotubes precisely ? Even after 14 years we struggle with that.
(b) How does carbon nanotube interacts with biology in human body ? What are the side effects ?
(c) Need to find an easy way of making conducting vs semiconducting nanotubes.
(d) Fuel cell efficiency. They have only said that they can convert the chemical energy to mechanical energy, but how well ?
(e) Ethical issue: This may not be a big deal if that person with artificial limbs can generate 100 times more force with no effort and break anyone's neck. But I am sure once we start augmenting human brain with more computational power (may be carbon nanotubes are faster than neurons, use them !!), then we may have to rethink !!
It seems these guys haven't heard of the way you convert force to distance and vis versa.
It's called the "leverage" and its used in everything from simple levers to pully systems.
Seastead this.
The real driving force behind this research is the desire for a nano-enabled soldier of the future. They hope to use these as exo-muscles in combat suits to allow soldiers to literally "leap tall buildings in a single bound."
The MIT Institute for Soldier Nanotechnologies is working on this right now, but they don't see it being available for use for 30 years or so. I recently attended a lecture at MIT entitled "Nanotechnology: From Promise to Profitablility" that was almost entirely focused on military applications.
Amputees will certainly benefit, but that's not why the money is there for this research...
I've been working with technology similar to this for the past year at University of Washington. I think a lot of people are overlooking some of the most important benefits of this type of actuator. Robustness is a very critical aspect of any mechanical device. With current hydraulics and pneumatics, a small dent or bend will render the entire device unusable. With an artificial muscle, half the device could be ripped off and it could still function with a limited capacity.
Imagine a hydraulic actuator on a modern plane for instance. It would be nice to be able to still be able to control the aircraft's ailerons, flaps, rudder, and elevator even if significant damage occured to mechanical components.
That's one of the biggest differences between man and man-made machines. People can be injured and keep going (watch any Arnold movie). A machine, on the other hand, is pretty much all or nothing (except in Arnold movies).
-- sometimes AND gates turn me on.
No comments about modding your Real Doll (or robot girlfriend, etc.)? Get with it, people!
Has anybody read the Space Odyssey series? I don't remember which book it's in, but Arthur Clarke once talks about the history of the creators of the black boxes. They were a normal civilization that became extremely advanced and eventually built large ships that could take them all over the universe. But they could also incorporate the mechanics and electronics into themselves, and incorporate (from the latin "corpus, corporis, n." meaning body: particularly effective in this sense!) themselves into their machines until eventually, they were their own machines, constantly improving upon themselves. It goes on to explain that they were able to transcend matter entirely and exist in a way we cannot quite comprehend.
Also, in the book 3001, Clarke predicts braincap machines that add the abilities of a computer to whoever wears them.
I for one welcome the new experience of becoming the overlords of the universe. How long until we can transcend matter and build conscienceness-inspiring black boxes?
Esoteric reference.
I for one welcome our new paraplegic overlords.
sig not found. please replace sig.