Yahoo Releases Desktop Search Tool Beta

Rolan writes "Yahoo! has released to BETA their Desktop Search Tool. It has a much longer list of file types that it will search, including compressed files, than the Google Desktop Search Tool. Though, the usefulness of a good number of those file types would come into question for most people."

Comments

Yahoo! Says, "Me Too!" -- Again

[savagedome]

Motley Fool has a write up about YDS.

http://www.fool.com/News/mft/2005/mft05011117.htm

Finally!

[solowCX]

I can search my collection of MacWrite II files!

Cool

[durtbag]

I'm still waiting for CoolWWWSearch to come out with their desktop search utility.

Usefulness

[papadiablo]

While it's an interesting subject to explore, I'm not convinced of the usefulness of this product. I installed the Google desktop search when it first game out, used it for about a week, and then stopped. Usually I know where things on my computer are, and don't need to search for them. But if I do need to search for them, chances are I will just use whichever application is appropriate to search for them. For instance, if I'm in Outlook and I want to find a mail about something then I'll search in Outlook. I don't want to switch to a browser to find emails. I don't know how applicable it would be for me to want to search through both email and other documents for the same thing. Anybody have some counter examples to share?

Re:Usefulness

[hal9000(jr)]

Yep.

I use Outlook and I can search for and locate Outlook emails in about 2 seconds. When I use Outlook search, I have to wait until it searches every single email and them presents them to me and here is the kicker, I can't do anything else while Outlook is searching otherwise the search stops. I have a couple of 1000 emails (I tend to keep deleted email for a long time and I rarely clean out my in box).

Another use is that I have alot of files for work in My Documents that I refer back to often as far as a year or so. No amount of organizing is going to save me time locating stuff.

The point is, computers are good at indexing and searching, I am not, so let the computer do the work.

Forgot something?

[mscnln]

They spend their time deciphering file formats that haven't been used for 10 years, but they don't include AbiWord or OpenOffice whose file format is open??

OpenOffice.org/StarOffice

[kosmosik]

I can't understand why it does not index OOo/SO documents? Those formats are *open* and well documented. Or FireFox/Mozilla bookmarks/mail/history - it is also open and documented - I bet the community is also willing to help when they (Yahoo developers) have some issues with that. Also probably it is more common than some obscure DOS editors...

In my office we use only OOo (but on Windows) FireFox and Thunderbird - we have crafted some rather nice services including central databases with LDAP export to email clients, custom web apps running exclusively with FireFox (XUL-based), OpenOffice.org is connected to databases also, all server infrastructure is running Linux (Fedora) and lowlevel stuff (DNS, routing, FW etc.) is working on OpenBSD...

So - having desktop search tool that will allow to index that (OOo/Mozilla) will be usefull to us. Todays offering simply suck as they go indexing only some expensive and crappy formats that some expensive and ureliable software produces...

w00t

[tuxter]

Google - "w00t"
MS - "w00t"
Yahoo - "w00t"
Google - "Ah, fuck it!"

open source?

[weighn]

this isn't meant to be a troll, but has work begun on an open source desktop search tool?

A quick peek at sourceforge makes me think no.

Re:open source?

[naugrim]

Beagle is the closest thing out there that I know of for open source. It isn't web based but when it works properly (it's still in development) it is supposed to be able to search bookmarks, email, IM logs, etc. similar to how these desktop search programs work.

Re:If Google were to jump off the Brooklyn Bridge.

[SUB7IME]

But then the search for 'French Military Victories' would be so bland.