Slashdot Mirror
Apple Releases Mac Mini
cranesan writes "The rumors of Apple releasing a small PC are confirmed. The Mac mini can be found at Apple's website. As expected, the box uses a G4 processor. You can order one today; estimate 3-4 weeks shipping date. Base unit starts at $499."
C'mon guys. This isn't news, especially since you reported it yourself here. It's just a two day old dupe of old news.
http://www.petitiononline.com/MacmiEU/petition.htm l
As much as 'PC' has come to define a machine derived from the original IBM PC, 'PC' means "Personal Computer".
Cheers
Lost at C:>. Found at C.
This was previously discussed on this Slashdot story. Also of interest is this announcement :
s .html
/. story discussing the Mac Mini, I believe this Mac Mini is doomed for a **huge** success. Good for competition. Good for everyone :-)
Apple announced their financial results for the fourth quarter today, reporting a profit of $295M, or $0.70 per share. They shipped 4.58M iPods, an increase of 525 % over the year ago quarter. But more surprisingly, Apple CPU sales were up 26% themselves over the year ago quarter. Over 1,046,000 Macs went found their way into customer's hands in the quarter.
See http://www.apple.com/pr/library/2005/jan/12result
After reading comments from the other
Animoog.org
yes Its more expensive and slower, except if you value some of the excellent software it comes with and the small form factor its worth it.
imovie is an excellent video editor (enough better the compaq with various cheap editing packages)was abandoned...(Not to mention this apple machine comes with firewire, a requirement for getting video off the cam corder.)
iphoto is excellent photo storage tool.
OS X is pretty good to, but if you want a windows box go nuts..
play doom3
Well... I'd say this would be one case where you'd buy the OEM RAM. The mini-mac's only got one DIMM. So, if you buy the 256MB, then run out and buy a 512MB stick from Crucial, say, you'd be throwing your money away on the 256MB that came with the unit.
/. is a bunch of nerds at a million typewriters. It's not a political conspiracy determined to undermine your beliefs.
How is the Mini "insanely overpriced" compared to the computer you mentioned?
CPU - OK, the "headless Dell" is faster.
RAM - Both same amount of RAM
HD - Both 40 gigs
Warranty - the Dell is a year better..and is on-site.
BOTH COST $499
So, where is the "insanely overpriced" come in? If it were $699 then perhaps you would have a valid argument. But of course, you do not.
Not to mention the fact you get a TON of software with the Mini and OSX. How much software comes with the Dell? Yeah, thought so...
And here I'm not even using a Mac nor own a Mac and even I can see you're so full of shit it's not even funny. If you have a beef against Apple, then please, think a little harder next time to come up with something of substance.
"Leo Fender was in a 'state of grace' when he designed the Stratocaster." -- Paul Reed Smith
The reason that you're going to get a dozen replys from the Apple "amen corner" is that you very clearly don't get it. If you could buy a Yugo for $5000 or a Honda for $5500, which one would you want? Sure, you could say that Dell is better than Yugo, but you'd still be missing the point.
Apple's hardware is better than the bottom basement x86 crap. Dell is using the lowest bidder, and changing monthly. Apple is consistently using the same hardware. This is important for two reasons. First, Apple can make sure the drivers work well. In the x86 world, drivers are a mess, written by the company that made the hardware. You have no guarantee of quality, and that is partially what makes Windows unstable. Second, if the hardware sucks, Apple will drop them.
More importantly, Apple's software is better. OS X is very pleasant to use. It's powerful for advanced users, and simple for novices. The bundled apps are easier to use. Plug and play works very well. Your mom's camera will just work without special drivers and special helper apps for downloading the images (yes, some digicams just work under Windows, but my Canon required a whole suite of applications to get the damn pictures from it).
What you seem to not understand is that these things have a value. In fact, they are worth at least the $50 price difference to many people. The fact that people find value in this shouldn't bother you. You shouldn't feel some compelling need to point out that an apple and an orange have different prices. Many people want a Mac. You seem to think that people want a computer.
I haven't really noticed much speed difference between my current machine (1.5GHz G4) and my last one (1.25GHz G4), so I wouldn't bother with this. Even big compiles and video editing only gain a small amount.
up it to a gig of RAM
Never buy RAM from Apple. They charge 2-3 times the value of the RAM for installation.
a superdrive
If you really need to burn DVDs. I've got some use from my SuperDrive, but I wouldn't consider it essential. Waiting a year and adding a FireWire Blu-Ray / HD-DVD drive might be a better bet.
bluetooth
You can get a USB bluetooth module on eBay for a quarter of what Apple charge for internal Bluetooth. And yes, OS X will almost certainly support it.
wireless keyboard and mouse
So get a wired one.
and give it a 3 year warranty
It comes with a 1 year warranty. Adding another two years for a third of the price of the machine doesn't sound like a great deal. I'd be more inclined to throw it out and replace it with a newer and faster one if it breaks after the first year.
you don't have nifty Mac stuff like video-in
My PowerBook has exactly the same video-in capabilities as the Mac Mini - a FireWire port. Neither machine has any analogue video input capability, and neither does any recent Mac I've seen without 3rd party hardware (and if you really need it, there are analogue -> FireWire boxes available).
and you have a CPU that compares to what was out a few years ago.
And is still used in the current PowerBook line, and is probably fast enough for most people.
Is this really a good deal?
If you insist on adding every possible customisation to it, then no. If the basic model (perhaps with the RAM upgraded to 512MB) is good enough for your needs, then yes.
I am TheRaven on Soylent News
Err, you DO know that other companies besides Apple make displays, right?
Those displays will work with the mini. So will pretty much any USB keyboard and mouse. And this machine is targeted rather specifically at people who already have a keyboard, mouse, and display.
Some people will piss and moan about anything, I swear.
Tiger's Core Image system is what provides that eye candy. Sadly, Core Image requires a much better GPU than the 9200.
That isn't to say that Tiger won't run on a Mac mini or an iBook - it most certainly will. You just won't get all the nifty eye candy. And really, other than the temporary "wow" factor, you can do everything you need to do without a bunch of superfluous effects.
Tiger will run an an iBook or a Mac mini, just without all the extra gewgaws. And believe me, with Dashboard, enhanced search, and the way Apple OS upgrades generally get faster with each release, even without CI it would probably be a worthwhile upgrade.
Heard where?
The RAM I've got in my old G4 began its life in a Dell server. It runs OS X just fine. It ran OS 9 and 8.6 just peachy, too. I have trouble believing that an OS could identify the difference between OEM and 3rd party RAM, or behave any differently.
Cheap, flaky RAM, on the other hand, can hose a machine no matter what OS you're running.
This simply isn't true. I'll let Henry Norr, veteran Mac journalist at http://www.macintouch.com/mwsf2005notebook.html/, tell it like it is:
Apple "does not recommend" that users upgrade the memory themselves - you're supposed to have a service provider do it if you want to add more after purchase - but doing it yourself does not void the warranty unless you damage something. A booth person told me the memory slot is easily accessible once you get the case open.This has been Apple's policy for donkey years.
"Where's my other sock?" - A. Einstein