Slashdot Mirror


Not Much Happening in Hard Drives This Year

yahooooo writes "CoolTechZone.com has an article that talks about desktop hard drive developments in 2005. It looks this year is going to be a dud for the storage industry."

6 of 449 comments (clear)

  1. Re:What about reliability? by Lisandro · · Score: 4, Informative

    Make that both reilabilty and speed for me. PATA/SATA disk are still lagging horribly behind stuff like SCSI disks and their 10k RPM offerings.

    PS: If you want reilabilty for cheap, check the Seagate Barracuda series (i own this one) - cheap, VERY reliable and also damn quiet. I can't tell if the thing is running or not by listening to it.

  2. 2004 was also a dud for PC HDDs by PenguinOpus · · Score: 4, Informative

    Ever since Maxtor announced (but didn't ship) a 320GB drive in August 2003, things have moved too slowly in the PC (3.5") drive market. Maxtor finally shipped 300G and that was king for a while before Hitachi (and now others) shipped 400G. The lack of motion is very unusual compared to the historical size increases we've seen over the last 20 years.

    I think the article doesn't make it clear that manufacturers' focus has moved to several other areas:

    - 2.5" drives for use in servers (density of machines, not data)
    - 1.8" drives for iPods (now up to 80G)
    - 1" drives for mini-iPods and CF cards
    - sub-1" drives (Cornice...) for CF and cell phones

    Even though some of us need TBs of storage, most of the CE world would be happy with 10G for their music/video-recording.

  3. $/GB by Saeger · · Score: 4, Informative
    Just thought I'd chime in with a quick report on the value of various hard drives.

    The best bang/buck EIDE hard drive you can get today is ~40cents per GB for a 160GB drive; any smaller capacity and you'll be paying more for less. For a little less than 50cents/GB you can get a 250,200, or 180GB drive where the increased storage density might be worth the extra few pennies per GB. The 400GB and 300GB monsters are under $1/GB, but still aren't a very good value (unless you have money burning a hole in your pocket and value bragging rights).

    So, IMO, the best bang/buck for your average guy is putting two to four 160GB or 250GB drives in RAID 1 or 5.

    --

    --
    Power to the Peaceful
  4. Re:What about reliability? by Fweeky · · Score: 4, Informative

    Seagate have been good for (S)ATA in my experience (and seems to be confirmed by StorageReview's reliability survey). A pair of 7200.7's should do you just fine (and they have 5 year warranties).

  5. Re:What I would like to see... by Pendragn_tk · · Score: 3, Informative

    The Linksys NSLU2 is pretty cheap (around $80) and provides computer-less file sharing on home networks. As a plus, it runs Linux and can be hacked fairly easily. tk

  6. wrong.... by Benley · · Score: 3, Informative

    I don't think that's right. I've got one of those Ximeta thingies, and it just does some USB-over-ethernet trick (I assume) to be attached to any machine. I hear there is multi-write support (for windows only of course) now, perhaps that requires a machine to be the "master" host.