Slashdot Mirror


Robert Zemeckis to Direct Beowulf Movie

jangobongo writes "Robert Zemeckis, who directed the Polar Express and Back To The Future among many others, will helm a new remake of the epic tale of Beowulf. Sony Pictures is in discussions to distribute the picture. (This version is unrelated to another remake scheduled to be released in 2005 titled Beowulf & Grendel, which is currently in post-production.)" I have no idea which version will make for a better film, but this one has Neil Gaiman and Roger Avary writing the script for it as well.

22 of 206 comments (clear)

  1. Neil by daeley · · Score: 4, Informative

    Neil Gaiman just posted about this in his online journal.

    --
    I watched C-beams glitter in the dark near the Tannhauser gate.
  2. Two modern remakes of Beowulf? by daveschroeder · · Score: 5, Funny

    That sounds like the beginnings of a cluster!

    *ducks*

    1. Re:Two modern remakes of Beowulf? by BrynM · · Score: 5, Funny

      Imagine all of the bad geek jokes that will go around the IT staff of the production. I'd hate to be anywhere near that render farm! "If you tell one more cluster joke, I'm wiping the drives!"

      --
      US Democracy:The best person for the job (among These pre-selected choices...)
  3. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 5, Funny

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  4. Just imagine... by daveschroeder · · Score: 4, Funny

    ...a modern remake of this epic tale!

    What, expecting me to say something else? ;-)

    1. Re:Just imagine... by saforrest · · Score: 3, Informative

      Most around here are gonna be confused when they watch the movie and there's only one monster.

      Proving the theory that Slashdotters know far more about Beowulf clusters than Beowulf.

      There are actually three monsters in Beowulf: Grendel, Grendel's mother, and the dragon. (Of course, Beowulf takes them on serially rather than in parallel, and he waits a good forty years or so between Grendel's ma and the dragon.)

      (Hell, even Xena got this detail right, though in the Xena episode it was (predictably) Xena who did all the arse-kicking, while Beowulf mostly looked pretty.)

      In fact, there are even more monsters if you count the monsters mentioned in random digressions, such as when Beowulf is meeting the Danes and mentions how he basically swam across the Baltic in full armour carrying a sword while fighting sea monsters.

      As an aside, for Tolkien fans I would recommend the essay The Monsters and the Critics by J. R. R. himself, which argues that the monsters represent the central theme of the Beowulf poem.

  5. Wierd Movie Trend by jbrader · · Score: 3, Insightful

    So now theres two Beowulf movies coming soon and two War of the Worlds. I think its interesting to watch interpretations of the same source material by very different teams of filmakers. But I think this is the first time airs of movies have opened so near each other in time.

    --
    You are so boring that when I see you my feet go to sleep.
    1. Re:Wierd Movie Trend by jhoger · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Yeah Hollywood whines about their copyrights being violated, but once again the public domain is where they get their best source material.

      -- John.

  6. The sad thing is... by TooMuchEspressoGuy · · Score: 3, Informative
    ...that once Neil Gaiman is done writing an epic, intelligent script akin to his work in the medium of novels and graphic novels, Hollywood execs are probably going to pick it apart piece by piece. In the end, it will likely be just a bunch of random action sequences with little in the way of plot to tie it together, and with Neil's name attached to it to attract his fans.

    Then again, Hollywood hasn't ruined *everything* it has touched (think of the LotR movies.) There might still be hope.

    --
    Many Bothans died to bring you this sig.
    1. Re:The sad thing is... by Brett+Buck · · Score: 5, Funny

      But those hollywood execs are just working for our best interest! Good story, it just needs a little "punching up" - you know, a few car chases, explosions, and maybe a wise-cracking robot! People like that.

    2. Re:The sad thing is... by NTiOzymandias · · Score: 3, Funny

      There is no possible way that they can make this movie as bad as the 1999 version.

      There are a lot of really bad movies out there, it's true. Most of the moderately bad ones are boring; the truly terrible ones actually end up being fun to watch simply because they're such absolute crap. When they premiered the infamous "Manos: The Hands of Fate," the audience actually laughed uproariously.

      But there is no redemption for the '99 Beowulf.

      Imagine it.... Sitting there for two hours, unable to divert your gaze from the putridly pointless hellspawn on the screen before you. Your very soul, wrapped in a straitjacket with a crappy techno soundtrack, screams in vain for help -- and yet nobody will help you. Nobody will help you!!!

      YOU CAN FEEL YOUR BRAIN MELTING AND DRIBBLING OUT AROUND YOUR TERRIFIED EYEBALLS!!!!!

      Watching Beowulf '99 is much like being lobotomized.... one brain cell at a time. If Hollywood EVER outdoes that despicable feat, I'll wear a cowboy hat and then eat it.

  7. Re:epic tale of Beowulf by furball · · Score: 4, Funny

    Grendel is an unfinished Java-based mail client.

    http://www.mozilla.org/projects/grendel/

  8. But...? by MightyMartian · · Score: 4, Funny

    Will it be done in Anglo-Saxon, or in that sucky post-Norman dialect?

    --
    The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
  9. Riiiiight. by And+They+Called+Her · · Score: 3, Funny

    Proof that the only idea that still exists in movie-making is 'Let's drag X up and recycle it.' I predict the Beowulf movies will be at least as good as Troy and Alexander.

    --
    'Sparrow.'
  10. Beowulf II by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Hollywood is a ridiculous echo chamber. After a millenium and a half, they finally make a Beowulf in 1998, after a century of movies, so they make another in 1999. Then they make another two in 2005. They're more "me, too" than Usenet. Ever since the biz stopped being run by gamblers, it's gone straight down the tubes.

    --

    --
    make install -not war

  11. Yeah by Pan+T.+Hose · · Score: 5, Funny

    Awesome
    cant wait, this will be cool

    Yeah, just imagine it!

    --
    Sincerely,
    Pan Tarhei Hosé, PhD.
    "Homo sum et cogito ergo odi profanum vulgus et libido."
  12. Re:Y.A.B by l2718 · · Score: 3, Informative

    Yet Another Beowulf movie? How many is this now? 5? 6?

    Indeed hopefully this one will be better than "The Thirteenth Warrior". That movie is based on a Michael Crichton book, "Eaters of the Dead", which is a rather amusing literary exercize.

  13. A lot by Pan+T.+Hose · · Score: 4, Funny

    Yet Another Beowulf movie? How many is this now? 5? 6?

    There's a lot of them. It's like an entire cluster of movies.

    --
    Sincerely,
    Pan Tarhei Hosé, PhD.
    "Homo sum et cogito ergo odi profanum vulgus et libido."
  14. Re:Beowulf & Grendel: The Musical! by the+Dragonweaver · · Score: 3, Funny
    The scary part is such things exist:
    Pickering, Ken, and Keith Cole. Beowulf, A Rock Musical. Schulenburg, TX: I. E. Clark, 1986.
    This item is the libretto for a British musical from the early 1980s. Beowulf, A Rock Musical is meant for school-aged children, and is notable for its depiction of Grendel as a black-hearted, leather-clad punk rocker with a cockney accent--a clear reaction against the punk's place as an anti-establishment icon in Margaret Thatcher-era Britain.
    The lyrics go, I kid you not, something like "Beo- Beo- Beo- Beo- Beowulf!"

    Found via Beowulfiana
    --
    Actually I am a lab rat in an elaborate plot to take over the world.
  15. These will be good, but I'm looking forward to... by Rob+Carr · · Score: 4, Funny

    the Mel Brooks version!

    --
    This sig seemed like a good idea at the time....
  16. Beowulf Movie? by hunterx11 · · Score: 3, Funny

    So. We have seen many a slashdotter
    Grieve and grumble greatly over films.
    "Classics ruined!" they clamor. "Memories killed!" they cry.
    Should Greedo shoot first? Surely nay.
    Why then should they not whimper and whine
    When they hear this horror, a Beowulf film!
    Scyld Scefing? Shield Sheafson? Sam Soros?
    Which woeful name for the screen will be chosen?
    Michael Crichton told a tale once;
    The movie was made, many watched.
    Sadly it sucked. Sigh.

    --
    English is easier said than done.
  17. Re:Let's hope they tell it right... by fumblebruschi · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I just re-read the latest (and imho greatest) Beowulf translation by Seamus Heaney.

    I don't care for the Heaney translation myself--it's not faithful to either the letter or the spirit of the original.
    Just one example of how flat the whole thing feels to me: lines 499-501, where the Danish thane Unferth challenges Beowulf. Heaney not only mis-translates it, he misrepresents the whole scene. Unferth is described as "he aet fotum saet frean Scyldinga", literally, "he (who) sat at the feet of the lord of the Scyldings." That is, Unferth was the Danes' champion and sat in the place of honor. Heaney renders this "crouched at the feet..." which is not only incorrect but gives the wrong idea of Unferth's status. Unferth rags on Beowulf about his famous contest with Breca; the poet says he "onband beadu-rune", literally, "unbound a battle-rune." Heaney says he "spoke contrary words." Way to press the life out of it. Not only is that a boring phrase, it's incorrect. Unferth is not hostile to Beowulf. He's making him feel at home, by busting his balls a little like a drinking buddy would, and giving Beowulf a chance to boast about himself. Beowulf's answer makes that clear:

    Hwaet thu worn fela wine min Unferth
    beore druncen ymb Brecan spraece,
    saegdest from his sithe. Soth ic talige..."


    "Well, many things, my friend Unferth,
    drunk with beer Of breca you have spoken,
    talkd of his journeys. I'll tell you what happened..."

    I recommend getting Howell Chickering's facing-page translation. Or, if you don't mind putting in a little effort that, believe me, will be well spent, get Klaeber's 3rd edition of the Cotton Vitellius manuscript and Sweet's Anglo-Saxon Primer. You'll be well rewarded.