Slashdot Mirror


Just How Paranoid Are You?

An anonymous reader writes "We all understand the need for security in a corporate environment. Personal computers, however, typically don't have nearly the amount of sensitive information (or it's at least less damaging if found). How far do you go to protect your computer? I recently went overboard on securing my information (at least as secure as Windows XP can be). I have a hardware firewall (GTA GB500), 30 character password, and all remotely personal information stored on a 256bit AES encrypted volume. How far do you go to protect your information against 'Big Brother' or even your family/friends?"

4 of 931 comments (clear)

  1. dsfduso78976s by Cytlid · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    oid7 67^%z55 5^s55 7s6 556 ? __9d9s7+~!! *&# @,x*&7dfhhfh ... *D7s8d6zxkh d76d 67s5.

    =-= *ds76

    --
    FLR
  2. Re:Thanks for the info by aeroelastic · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    At least it's not "1 2 3 4 5", like on my luggage.

    --
    "It doesn't take a rocket scientist" -I guess I should leave then
  3. Re:Physical access! by Ohreally_factor · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    You give your computer a "reach around"? Now that is what I call thoughtful and considerate. What a swell guy! Your mother sure taught you good manners.

    --
    It's not offtopic, dumbass. It's orthogonal.
  4. Re:You are retarded. by pclminion · · Score: 0, Offtopic
    There is no additional security in pretending to be secure, cause anyone who wants to can just check if he's lying or not.

    You need to take a course in logic. You're talking about A => B, where I am arguing about the claim that !A => !B. These are logically distinct claims. Your arguments are irrelevant to the discussion, because we aren't even discussing the same thing.