Should Taxpayers Pay Twice For Weather Data?
theodp writes "Thanks to O.M.B. Circular A-130, taxpayers now enjoy free access to SEC, Patent Office, and IRS data over the Internet. Now the Bush administration must decide whether to order the National Weather Service to make taxpayer-funded weather readings freely available on the Net, ignoring complaints from an industry trade group that doing so violates pre-Internet era agreements."
This is gonna kick up a storm.
They'll skip options one and two and head straight to Option Three:
Declare the weather a matter of national security, and order that it be classified as sensitive material immediately.
Uhh...ebag? The article referenced in the submission is the Fallows article, republished through CNet.
I guess we can at least look forward to a Michael Sims finding a way to dupe this using the original NYTimes. I wonder -- do the editors get a cut of the ad revenue that is generated by each of the articles they sponsor n the front page?
The result is lots of dead pilots and boaters every year
How can better access to weather information result in more deaths? I find that a rather ridiculous assumption. Would you care to provide some evidence of that?
"This is gonna kick up a storm."
Hopefully no trailer parks will be harmed.
ignoring complaints from an industry trade group that doing so violates pre-Internet era agreements
I am altering the deal. Pray I don't alter it any further.
If Wx data were publically available, we run the risk of weathermen like this instead of the highly trained media professionals we have now.
try { do() || do_not(); } catch (JediException err) { yoda(err); }
It's slashdot.org.us. In American English, though, the ".us" is silent.
Boffoonery - downloadable Comedy Benefit for Bletchley Park
The world's best research sees its first incarnation on bar napkins across the globe.
Bar napkins in strip joints, if we're lucky.
-kgj
-kgj
Ah... how I wish the us was silent sometimes....
Bloggy Goodness