Slashdot Mirror


Writing Fiction Using SubEthaEdit

Phil Shapiro writes "The recent blizzard on the East Coast makes for some great collaborative creativity opportunities of various sorts, including group fiction writing using SubEthaEdit. Did you know you can write fiction about collaborative fiction writing using collaborative fiction writing tools? We didn't either." Man, the best fiction I've ever produced is some of the project plans created using SubEtha.

33 of 185 comments (clear)

  1. An honor? by Lifereaper0 · · Score: 5, Funny

    "national teaching award from Radio Shack" What an honor to win such a thing. What's next? Best movie award from /. ?

    1. Re:An honor? by daeley · · Score: 4, Funny

      Worst part about it is they ask you for your address and phone number before they'll give you the award! ;)

      --
      I watched C-beams glitter in the dark near the Tannhauser gate.
  2. For those who don't know... by diamondsw · · Score: 5, Informative

    ...this is SubEthaEdit. It's a rendezvous and network-aware text editor designed for collaborative coding that seems to be finding more use. Meanwhile, it's also just a damn nice text editor for general use, and is free (yes, I know that TextWrangler is also free now).

    --
    I don't know what kind of crack I was on, but I suspect it was decaf.
    1. Re:For those who don't know... by Ford+Prefect · · Score: 3, Informative

      Meanwhile, it's also just a damn nice text editor for general use, and is free

      You do have to pay for a commercial use licence - only saying this because I'm one of those people who has registered!

      It's a great text editor just by itself, but since nobody I work with has a Mac it's a little annoying that my copy stays offline. Still, it was well worth the registration fee anyway, and supporting other programmers financially gives one that warm-and-fuzzy feeling you only get with registering non-nagging shareware. ;-)

      --
      Tedious Bloggy Stuff - hooray?
    2. Re:For those who don't know... by the_2nd_coming · · Score: 2, Informative

      it is a GREAT Programming editor... is supports tons of languages out of the box and you can get more Modes from the website plus write your own and submit them.

      --



      I am the Alpha and the Omega-3
    3. Re:For those who don't know... by Space+Coyote · · Score: 3, Interesting
      I would like to add that I wish that codemonkeys would port this tool to Linux or start a project of adding support for their software to talk to there software like this because it would d be nice to use it to actually do collaboration over the net.

      SubEthaEdit is a Cocoa application, which means porting it for Windows / Linux would require nearly a total re-write depending on how much of it is written in Objective-C. And from my experience with writing Cocoa apps vs. Win / Linux apps, you can get a very feature-rich, polished application up and running much more quickly with Cocoa, thanks to its use of frameworks. So a port to another OS might just seem like too much work for the team they have.

      But I would definitely love for more programmers to start using ZeroConf (rendezvous' generic name) on other platforms. It's just a damn neat protocol.

      --
      ___
      Cogito cogito, ergo cogito sum.
    4. Re:For those who don't know... by ceeam · · Score: 2, Funny

      YES! Finally. Now we just need a game that is available for Mac and not the PC and the Earth polars will swap. Or something.

    5. Re:For those who don't know... by rtm1 · · Score: 2, Informative

      SubEthaEdit is a Cocoa application, which means porting it for Windows / Linux would require nearly a total re-write depending on how much of it is written in Objective-C

      Because it has to be said, there is always GNUstep when you need to port a Cocoa app to Windows or *nix. I have read mixed reviews, but if you stick to the core Openstep API then you should be okay porting your Cocoa app to GNUstep. As far as Obj-C goes, gcc does compile it, so it isn't the language that's the stumbling block.

      All of that said, the codingmonkeys have commented in the past that their use of Apple only frameworks (rendezvous, addressbook, etc), would make a port to gnustep really difficult, and that they make pretty heavy use of the newer Apple Cocoa extensions (CoreFoundation) that aren't in Openstep or GNUstep. So doing a Windows / *nix port is hard, but not because of Obj-C or Cocoa in general, but because SubEtha uses several of the newer OS X APIs that aren't in Openstep. At least that is my understanding of it.

      --
      "Belief means not wanting to know what is true." [Nietzche, The Anti-Christ, 1889]
    6. Re:For those who don't know... by chickens · · Score: 2, Informative

      I've been looking for a few months now for a cross-platform alternative to SubEthaEdit. There exists a plugin for jEdit, but that's implemented on top of IRC and is a bit of work to set up

      Just recently discovered MoonEdit which is a little more like what I need. The collaboration works very well, but it's a bit light on other features..

      A port of SubEthaEdit would be so nice...*dreams*

    7. Re:For those who don't know... by jcr · · Score: 2, Informative

      A few other comments...

      SubEthaEdit is a winner of the Apple Design Award for 2003 (at the time, the product was known as "Hydra".)

      This is the kind of surprising use of a new technology that I just love to see. Apple put out Rendezvous, expecting apps along the lines of chat programs. Not "multi-user text editor".

      With Bluetooth, we were expecting people to come up with apps similar to Sync Services, to keep your phone and address book in sync. We sure weren't expecting Jonas Salling to figure out how to use a bluetooth phone as a remote control and proximitiy sensor (see Salling Clicker... Very Clever Indeed.)

      There are a lot of new things coming up in Tiger, and I just can't wait to see what kinds of apps people think up for CoreVideo, CoreData, Etc.

      Another thing worth mentioning: The Coding Monkeys are three college kids, who wrote this app while carrying a full course load. Yeah, they're great coders, but they're also getting a lot of leverage from Cocoa.

      -jcr

      --
      The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
  3. Ummmm, Okay. I'm Following Along, I Think... by RobotRunAmok · · Score: 4, Funny

    Man, the best fiction I've ever produced is some of the project plans created using SubEtha.

    The greatest lasagne recipe I ever wrote was crafted in MS Word 6.0.

    OK, OK, Courier 12 point, if you must know.

  4. Writing fiction by misrepresenting science by Ingolfke · · Score: 4, Funny

    An excellent example can be found here.

    The formula is as follows.
    1.) Write article based entirely on misrepresented sensational claims about the end of the world.
    2.) Get slashdotted
    3.) Sell more ads for website based on high traffic volumes (use only averages when representing numbers to ad buying customers.)
    4.) Profit!

  5. Re:Sorry by KingDaveRa · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Its a shame there's not a windows/*nix version, or a similar thing using AIM or MSN Messenger. Do similar tools exist and I've never seen them maybe? I'd like to do some online collaborations.

  6. This only solves the technical problem. by iJames · · Score: 3, Informative
    The real problem with collaborative fiction is finding collaborators who aren't idiots, and then getting good work out of it. The "article" linked was stilted and the humor was inane.

    Sure, there are projects suited to live collaboration. Screenplays, songs, even blog fiction (self plug). But prose narrative is one of the least likely. Name one good novel that was written by committee.

    1. Re:This only solves the technical problem. by Rick.C · · Score: 4, Funny
      Name one good novel that was written by committee.

      The Bible. Council of Nicea, 300 AD.

      It's been on the best-seller list for centuries. I filed my copy under "Historical Fiction."
      --
      You were 80% angel, 10% demon. The rest was hard to explain. - Over The Rhine
      "Math in a song is good."-Linford
    2. Re:This only solves the technical problem. by tb3 · · Score: 4, Funny

      Sorry, but I have to disagree with you there.
      The plot rambles, the protagonist is completely unlikable, the writing style is dull and repetitive, and it really bogs down in the final chapters.

      --

      www.lucernesys.comHorizon: Calendar-based personal finance

    3. Re:This only solves the technical problem. by iJames · · Score: 3, Funny
      The Bible. Council of Nicea, 300 AD.

      Same objection as the article link: the prose is stilted, the humor is inane.

    4. Re:This only solves the technical problem. by iJames · · Score: 2, Interesting
      A good editor would probably solve that. Novels are usually very personal works of art- I wouldn't want to work with someone who dismisses the few who want to try it as "idiots."

      Don't get me wrong, if someone does manage to get good prose fiction out of collaboration I'll applaud. My point was only that it's hard, and finding the right software to do it with is not the hard part. I'd personally find it more convenient comfortable to e-mail drafts back and forth rather than having two people edit the exact same text at the exact same time. One needs to give other people's ideas time to develop a shape before one takes a chisel to them.

      I suspect you may be one of the idiots who ruined "Invisible James."

      If I understood this, I might be able to respond to it. Are you talking about my Web site? What's ruined about it?

  7. Reminds me of some forum fun we had when bored by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    Each new post describing a choice. How geeky...

    You come up to the entrance to a crumbling dungeon, where the fabled ruby of souls resides. Rummaging around in your pockets, you fish out your trusty dagger. Well...dagger..ish. Ok, it's a butter knife. hopefully you can find something better. Looking up at the cavernesque mouth of the dungeon, a chill runs down your spine, and a small spider crawls up your leg. Ick! you quickly swat it, then ponder the situation at hand. a set of vines snakes all over the sides of the tower that overlooks the dungeon courtyard. you could probably get a good view from there. then again, it looks reaaaaaly high up, and you've been known to get dizzy on a stepladder. maybe it's best to just not know what's ahead...

    Will you:
    A: try to climb up to the tower?
    B: press on into the dungeon?
    C: Go home and have tea?

    B: press on into the dungeon.

    Being scared of heights, you choose to press on into the dank dungeon, smelling the foul nastiness that is this thing. You find a copper sword on the ground, bending it as you smash it dirt wall of the dungeon. "Eh, my knife is better than this piece of pooh." You open a nearby door, and watch a dog eating some gecko thing on the floor. You hear a message echoing throughout the dungeon: "Dog has killed a gecko." Upon approaching the dog, you notice some writing on the ground.

    "I$ #ou c$n r!@ t#i@ &u% m$*t be sm@r$."

    Do you:
    A: north [enter]
    B: write with knife [enter]
    C: /me ill-it-errr-it [enter]

    A: Enter the area

    You suddenly realize that you are in the middle of a NetHack game, and that the little dog is at least 5 times stronger than you. Frantically searching your pockets, you find something squishy. Aha! tripe, your favorite midnight snack. with a mighty heave, you lob the ball of smelly meat at the dog, which greedily devours it, then looks at you lovingly. Aww, how sweet, you made a friend. Now that you have a chance to search the room, which reveals a well-hidden, and very sturdy looking door.

    Will you:
    A: Open the door carefully?
    B: Kick the door down?
    C: Kick the dog?

    C: Kick the dog

    With a mighty hoof you poot the dog in the side of it's belly. For a moment it does nothing, before letting out a strange welp noise, then making a bolt for the door. It smashes it down, whining as it goes. You look on through the now defunct doorway to see a band of Half-Clay Superorc beyond, flattened by your pooch's charge. In the distance you can hear the mutt whining, surely far into the dungeon and out of audible reach. Walking into the corridor, you notice three exits. Which will you take?

    A: North
    B: South
    C: Dennis

    etc...

  8. Re:Mac OSX only... by the_2nd_coming · · Score: 4, Interesting

    like?

    and BTW.. SubEtha has been around for years.. prior to the name change 3 years ago they were known as HydraEdit.

    --



    I am the Alpha and the Omega-3
  9. WTF? by Junior+J.+Junior+III · · Score: 4, Funny
    Did you know you can write fiction about collaborative fiction writing using collaborative fiction writing tools?


    My internal English parser barfed on this sentence. WTF is the parent talking about???
    --
    You see? You see? Your stupid minds! Stupid! Stupid!
  10. Re:Sorry by Teppy · · Score: 3, Informative

    Collaborative text editors were a hot research topic about 8-10 years ago, and it turns out to be quite hard to get them right.

    The only mostly-finished one I could find that runs on Windows (and Linux!) is MoonEdit. Anyone want to put a server up and try it?

  11. Re:Sorry by Tenebrious1 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Its a shame there's not a windows/*nix version, or a similar thing using AIM or MSN Messenger. Do similar tools exist and I've never seen them maybe? I'd like to do some online collaborations.

    Well, there's NetMeeting, which comes with Win2K and XP (and as an install on earlier versions). Text, audio/video conf, whiteboard, app sharing. Not the greatest but it's already installed and it's free.

    --
    -- If god wanted me to have a sig, he'd have given me a sense of humor.
  12. what about wiki? by dns_server · · Score: 2, Insightful

    isn't wiki designed for this collaberation? unlike sub ertha edit, it is not fixed to an operating system, just a web browser, allowing everyone to participate.

    1. Re:what about wiki? by revscat · · Score: 4, Informative

      While Wiki is designed for collaboration, it doesn't allow simulatenous changes that are immediately visible to all collaborators. If you and I were working on a document in SubEthaEdit you would see any changes I make as I make them, and I yours.

      All that and syntax highlighting, too. It's basically the difference between a text editor you run yourself vs. typing a message into Slashdot.

  13. Re:Ummmm, Okay. I'm Following Along, I Think... by Xpilot · · Score: 2, Funny

    Lightweights! Real men use vi with LaTeX to write their lasagna recipes. Donald Knuth would be so proud.

    --
    "Backups are for wimps. Real men upload their data to an FTP site and have everyone else mirror it." -- Linus Torvalds
  14. IT JUST WORKS™ by jdwest · · Score: 4, Informative

    On a whim, I installed SubEthaEdit for a recent collaborative project for use on a P'book and a friend's iBook. Both of us were editing (wirelessly) the same document within five minutes -- w/o reading a line from TFM . Nothing scientific to back it up, but we agreed that it saved us a good amount of total project time (and it completely changed our workflow on all projects from that time forward).

    --

    Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet ...
  15. Re:TextWrangler--too little, too late by tlhIngan · · Score: 2, Interesting

    What I want to know is when a vi-style interface would be put into SubEthaEdit. (I know the FAQ says vi/etc. can't do this, but I don't see what's wrong with putting a vi-interface on SubEthaEdit then). I'd register SubEthaEdit once implemented!

    Surely I can't be the only one with source code littered with ":q" and other stuck vi-isms until we realize the editor doesn't support them...

  16. It's a moot point. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    Mac users don't want their writing tainted by non-Mac users. And I agree.

  17. Re:TextWrangler--too little, too late by Trillan · · Score: 2, Informative

    Well, I asked the coding monkeys for a minor fix back with 1.0, and it's still broken. And rather than opening the source like they said they were considering, SubEthaEdit now costs $35 for commercial use, whereas TextWrangler is just plain free.

    Don't get me wrong; I am looking for an alernative, too. But SubEthaEdit isn't it.

  18. Re:alternatives by Leo+McGarry · · Score: 3, Insightful

    It's closed-source, Windows/Linux x86 only, is a terrible editor, the UI is horrible and it's generally a pain to use in comparison to subetha which Just Works, but it's a lot better than nothing.

    That doesn't add up to me. If it doesn't run on a Mac, is a bad program with a bad user interface and is a pain to use ...how is it better than nothing? If the tool gets in the way, aren't you better off ditching the tool?

  19. Re:Mac OSX only... by TylerL82 · · Score: 2, Informative

    Just "Hydra". I still rename each update of SubEthaEdit (HYDRA!!!) after I download it.

  20. We've been doing it for years at my school by bigBlackSabbath · · Score: 2, Interesting
    We started using Subethaedit years ago, starting when it it was originally called Hydra. I work in a high school, and we have carts full of iBooks which we bring to classes. I started using Hydra when it first came out, and suggested to the teacher of our Creative Writing class that it may be useful in his class. We've been using it ever since.

    We started using it to work on playwriitng. One child does one person's dialog, another takes another character's dialog, while another will do descriptions, and another will edit and correct.

    What makes it work is rendezvous. The kids don't need to know ip addresses or hostnames - only usernames. We can setup several groups at once without making it into a major project.

    Aside from the obvious benefits, it creates a transparent opportunity for the kids learn about group dynamics and working together in a way not many classroom activities do. Because the program works so simply, the kids focus on the work without thinking about the process of making it work together. There are other ways of accomplishing this, but nothing that's anywhere as simple as Subethaedit. I'm glad to see people are starting to see the usefulness of this approach. I'm amazed it's taken so long.