Meet The Co-Creator of Firefox

Jay Langhurst writes "Learn more about the roots of Firefox and about the 19-year-old who co-created the browser in this article. 'To take an internship at Netscape during the summer of 2001, Ross moved with his mother to a rented apartment near Netscape's offices in Mountain View, Calif. She drove him to work each morning.'"

Comments

Real or figment of media's imagination?

[Sanity]

I often wonder whether Blake Ross' involvement with FireFox is accurate and fair to other people involved, or whether it is a creation of the media in love with the notion that a 19 year old could go up against Microsoft and win.

Does anyone have a good understanding of the actual role Ross played here and whether the media reports are being fair to other contributors by focussing on him?

Re:Uhh...wow?

[MindStalker]

And completly rewrite the XUL that makes the frontend experience.

Re:Uhh...wow?

[finkployd]

How much of a geek genius does it take to do this

Slightly more than it takes to whine about it.

Finkployd

Re:But...

[Jugalator]

My question for you is why do the Slashbot continually claim that Firefox is so superior when it won't even render their favorite site correctly?

Because, even with this flaw, it's better than IE (the browser that's usually compared against)? I mean, Firefox isn't perfect, but IE is even less, from what I've seen.

If Slashdot doesn't render correctly how the hell can they claim that every site will work "just fine"?

Point me to a post where it has been said that all sites there is render just fine instead of just claiming something you think you've heard.

If their favorite site doesn't render correctly under Firefox do you really think that they are going to believe you when you tell them that it is better?

Depends on what they believe matters more, perfect rendering of Slashdot, or other issues like security problems. Also, Slashdot should render correctly in Firefox 1.1.

Re:But...

[bunratty]

My question for you is why do the Slashbot continually claim that Firefox is so superior when it won't even render their favorite site correctly?

Believe me, Internet Explorer has worse bugs than Firefox does. It's just that nearly every web developer tests their site very thoroughly in Internet Explorer, and most will go to great trouble to work around IE's many bugs. That's why sites look better in IE than in Firefox, even though Firefox is inherently superior. As bugs get fixed in Firefox and as more web developers test their sites in Firefox, this situation will improve.