Slashdot Mirror


Washington School Bans Halo 2 Tournament

Pluvius writes "A couple of high-school students in the Washington city of Puyallup wanted to raise money for the tsunami disaster in South Asia, and figured that the best way to do so was to hold a tournament using Bungie's hit XBox title Halo 2. Their school district disagreed, citing an anti-violence policy. Even though all of the parents of the children who would've taken part in the tournament signed waivers acknowledging the game's violence, Puyallup School District felt that due to school shootings across the country, 'anything we do that even looks like we're endorsing violence is not appropriate.'"

28 of 126 comments (clear)

  1. A mod, please? by AtariAmarok · · Score: 3, Funny

    Is there a mod for this that changes the weapons systems to Nerf guns?

    --
    Don't blame Durga. I voted for Centauri.
  2. *sigh* by Dragoon412 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Yes, because each and every person out there would make the obvious cognitive leap that raising charity money via tournaments of a futuristic game based on fragging aliens equates to condoning kids bringing guns to school and shooting their classmates, right? /sarcasm

    This is asinine. Does the school have a football team? A wrestling team? Or do those not count as violent?

    1. Re:*sigh* by nes11 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      It only takes one person, not "each and every person." The fact is, most of the parents are probably paying enough attention to their kids for it not to be a problem, but it only takes that one.

      This is a wise move for the school. If something bad happened, they would be held responsible by the public & the media whether parent's signed permission slips or not.

    2. Re:*sigh* by nes11 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      "How is it different from taking field trips to the zoo, or funding violent sports?"

      Kids break bones
      Kids shoot others.

      Can you really not see the difference here? Are you just completely retarded? Tell me something, when was the last time the media spent a full week covering a broken bone or teen pregnancy? Compare that to the uproar over columbine and similar incidents. There is a HUGE difference.

      you said:
      "There's no media frenzy over video games; there's just a select group of idiots like Lieberman and Buchanon that make a big stink over it."

      I never said there was, I said, IF something happened like some random kid going on a rampage, there would be a media stink.

      lol, I had assumed there was some intelligence in /. that spilled over to the games section. guess i was wrong. It's hilarious that mine was modded troll & yours was interesting. The lack of intelligence here is frightening.

  3. We suck. by keiferb · · Score: 3, Funny

    Are they really expecting the kids to go home, make a needle gun, and bring it in to school? All the Halo games teach is that you should kill aliens. It says nothing about school teachers or other students.

    Here's a spoon, America. Let's dig our heads out of our asses.

    1. Re:We suck. by gl4ss · · Score: 2, Insightful

      try to play it in coop in a lan setting for a weekend.. gets real old real fast.

      man vs. man.

      anyways.. what's the sad part is that they're disallowing it because they think that somebody might say to them later that they're endorsing violence.. they KNOW that it should be 100% OK - but are too afraid to let it happen.

      bunch of sissies.

      --
      world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
  4. What a non-story by Matt+Perry · · Score: 3, Insightful

    What a non-story (not slashdot but the article). The students want it, the parents signed off on it. So what if the school doesn't want it? Then don't involve the school. I'm sure there's plenty of other locations where one could hold the tournament. Maybe a local community center?

    --
    Slashdot: Failed Car Analogies. Amateur Lawyering. Anecdote Battles.
  5. RTFA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    The school *did* have a football team, but they deemed it to violent and closed it down. They now play a form of "peaceball" where opponents hand each other presents, then gently insist the other team is better than their own, and has won.

  6. So what? by GoofyBoy · · Score: 4, Insightful

    School's policy, school's decision.

    Just have the fundraiser outside of school property.

    --
    The surprise isn't how often we make bad choices; the surprise is how seldom they defeat us.
  7. If they refuse to endorse viloence.... by Landak · · Score: 5, Insightful

    If they refuse to endorse violence in any way, shape, or form; then bye bye Shakespeare, Dickens, Tolstoy (?), Nursery Rhymes; etc, as well as almost all forms of organised sport; modern art, some forms of modern music, etc; etc.

    It's a video game. Just as Romeo and Juliet is a book. Where one has you not-so-elegantly killing your opponents; the other has a very elegant description of someone killing his opponents. Where you conspire with your friends to best your enemies in Halo; the two houses "teams" conspire to best each other in Romeo and Juliet.

    Humanity is violent; its' roots are violence, and if you cannot control your own desire for violence then *you* probably *will* do something stupid at some point in your life- which has nothing to do whatsoever with Halo 2; Half-life 2; Doom 3.....

    --
    My UID is prime. Is yours?
    1. Re:If they refuse to endorse viloence.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Romeo and Juliet is a tragedy. It demonstrates how the violence between the two houses leads to ruin and unhappiness for all.

      Halo 2 is a video game. It rewards people for actively commiting acts of virtual violence.

      See the difference?

      The books you've listed contain violence, but they don't endorse it - very much the opposite. Halo 2, on the other hand, is an endorsement for commiting violent acts, albiet of the virtual variety.

  8. Should... by DrJonesAC2 · · Score: 2, Funny

    ...have stuck with MonkeyBall

    1. Re:Should... by ayersrj · · Score: 2, Funny

      I for one will not condone a game that encourages the capture and exploitation of animals from temperate climates for your enjoyment. I refuse to hold a tournament in my school.

  9. Sucks, but... by eviltypeguy · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I can't really blame them. All it would take is some bleeding-heart political activist and suddenly it would look like the school is endorsing violent activities. The school is protecting themselves from possible litigation and some possible embarassment. As much as it sucks, it's the safer decision they've taken.

  10. He's on the line by czarangelus · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I know this isn't going to be the most popular opinion, but I sort of feel sorry for the school district here. I mean, imagine if they did allow this and a parent complained, and you know one would. In a society that values censorship over responsibility, these people just did what they needed to to keep their jobs. As asinine as it seems, the district people were taking the safest route for all involved, politically. One more thing- imagine that a week later some nutball came to school and started shooting. You just know Halo 2 would have been blamed, whether the stupid kid went to the touroment or not. I guess if something were to happen, it's better that it not easily be tied to a form of media that a lot of people are trying very hard to censor.

    --
    When a true genius appears, you can know him by this sign: that all the dunces are in a confederacy against him.
    1. Re:He's on the line by ZephyrXero · · Score: 3, Insightful

      But that's just the thing... It's all politics. Politics do not belong in our schools. We Americans need to get over ourselves and start being real people again, forget all the politically correct bullshit. Seriously... This stuff is ruining our country. Secondly, if every single parent signed a waiver, then the school has no responcibilites anyway. Also you have to think about the fact that Halo is rated M (17+), how many of those kids are old enough to play the game without their parents consent anyway? Halo 2 is not really meant for children in the first place. But, since the parents agreed, then it's up to them, not the school now.

      --
      "A truly wise man realizes he knows nothing."
  11. A Call from the ACLU May Fix This by Doug+Dante · · Score: 4, Interesting
    While getting a bad rap for taking on the boy scouts, the ACLU is probably the most useful defender of students' rights in America (defending students rights to wear black arm bands, publish independent student papers, etc).

    IIRC, it's their legal position that student organizations all have an equal right to school facilities (yup even the Boy Scouts - just no 'special rights').

    You may want to contact them via their students' rights web site at ACLU student rights

    --
    The world will not get better through technology. We must seek to be better people.
    1. Re:A Call from the ACLU May Fix This by rpillala · · Score: 2, Interesting

      The real answer to this is in the last sentence of the article. The school system says they'll support the fundraiser if a less violent video game is played. The decision doesn't deny any students access, it regulates what they can do in the building. The normal school day is full of this kind of regulation.

      --
      When the axe came to the forest, the trees said, "Look out - the handle was once one of us."
  12. Re:*Yawn* by nes11 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I agree completely. just trying to add some humor. Want something really funny? check out my other post on this topic. I get modded troll for basically saying what you just said & another guy gets +4 insightful for bashing me.

    lol, this is a sad reflection on /. as a whole.

  13. Rated M for Mature by CoreyGH · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Halo 2 has an ESRB rating of M (17+). Most of the kids in highschool do not fit into that category. If they wanted to have a Mario Party tournament then I would understand people being upset over it being canceled but we have to face facts. Halo 2 is not for kids.

  14. Don't blame the school by nobodyman · · Score: 2, Insightful


    Look, think about it from the school's perspective. Lawyers will try to find even the most obscure link between a shooting and the video games the shooter may have played. If the school *did* allow this tournament to happen, you just know that if there was a shooting five years down the line that the school district would be the first in line to be sued.

    Don't blame the school, blame the sue-happy culture and the negative stigma of videogames for forcing their hand.

  15. Sponge Shooter by AtariAmarok · · Score: 2, Funny
    "yeah, a shooter with sponge bullets i hope they come up"

    Even if they don't raise any money, this is sure to reduce the teen pregnancy rate at the school.

    --
    Don't blame Durga. I voted for Centauri.
  16. This is horrible... by TJ_Phazerhacki · · Score: 2, Interesting
    Back in the day (wow - that sounds corny), we managed to bring in an external drive with UT:GOTYE and "forgot" to leave it plugged into the network. Great times, UT'ing during open lab at lunch. The best part was when a few of the male teachers found out, and "Annonomously" joind games during their breaks.

    It had little effect on productivity, grades didn't change, and we were using otherwise unnocupied resources. And I don't need to tell you the effect it had on morale...

    Few months later, in the next semester, we had some county people in the school. One of them was checking email in the lab. Someone else walked in and booted up UT.

    Not only did we recieve a ridiculous lecture (understand, we are 15 mins from Columbine, maybe 18mos later) but there were suspensions, the lab tech was reprimanded (later left the system - now makes twice the $$ dev'ing software!) And we made the district newsletter.

    Schools over-react to everything, because by default, the only people in district management are the ones who think there is something intrensically wrong with the way the system is run - they do not understand logic - They comprehend only liability.

    --
    Physics is nothing like religion. If it was, we'd have an easier time trying to raise money!
  17. Understandable by g0bshiTe · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I completely understand and agree with teh schools stance. Should anything have happened after the event, months or even years, you could bet that some parents group somewhere would have held the school liable for it.

    I also think that the students should be commended for wanting to do something to aid the victims of this disaster. It proves that their generation isn't as disenfranchised as we are lead to believe.

    Good job gamers!

    --
    I am Bennett Haselton! I am Bennett Haselton!
  18. What this really teaches us... by Black+Art · · Score: 3, Insightful

    This is only one small part of a much bigger problem.

    American students are not taught how to distinguish fantasy from reality.

    This has been going on for at least one generation, maybe more, depending on what criteria you use.

    This is why Americans are not allowed to see real phone numbers in fictional movies. If they do, people call the numbers trying to reach the fictional characters. (A film that had a story about God helping people had a real number in it and the people who happened to have that number were swamped by people trying to contact God.)

    Some people say our last election was an example of people who cannot tell fantasy from reality.

    Some of the people who want to protect us from real violence seem to believe that fantasy violence either causes it or encourages real violence when the statistics show no such correleation. Just because they cannot tell the difference does not mean that others do not.

    I can give other examples...

    I doubt that this problem will be solved soon. Too many parts of American culture derive their power from the confusion of fantasy and reality for their to be any real incentive to change.

    --
    "Trademarks are the heraldry of the new feudalism."
    1. Re:What this really teaches us... by JeffTL · · Score: 2, Informative

      Actually the phone number bit is more an issue of pranksterism than failure of fantasy distinguishment.

      KLonkdike 5 numbers, the predecessors to our "555-01xx" (usually implemented liberally as "555-xxxx" ), were in the movies over fifty years ago for this reason.

  19. And now for extinction news. by pauldy · · Score: 2, Funny

    The newest entry into the endangered lists, common sense. While everyone has been out ranting and raving about saving this animal, that plant, protecting minorities, and not hurting people's feelings we forgot to save one thing.

  20. The school's right. by phouka · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I'm guessing that a high percentage of the folks here condemning the school don't own homes.

    Why? Because homeowners go through this sort of painful deliberation regularly.

    I live in a cul-de-sac and my yard happens to be the recipient of all the snow for the entire street. For a kid, it presents awesome potential for king-of-the-hill, snowball fights, digging tunnels, etc. It's truly a massive amount of snow.

    But can I really let the neighborhood kids play in it? No way. The second one of them got hurt, it's MY homeowner's policy on the line. It's MY insurance that's going to not get renewed, forcing me to double my cost for homeowner's insurance when I have to resort to the state 'pool'. In other words, if I want to be a nice guy I have to accept an unreasonable risk.

    The school is in the same position. You can bet that administrator and the school officials really thought what the kids were doing was cool. You can also bet that they sat back and said: "When we get sued, it's going to require resources in time and money that we *really* can't afford, given ever-tightening school budges."

    So they came to the only reasonable conclusion.

    To all these folks screaming about the state of our country, I pose this question: Are you really, honestly ready to stand up and say "I won't sue my neighbor, even if he's technically culpable"? Because until you are, people are going to be more concerned about protecting themselves than in freeing up their resources to share.