Slashdot Mirror


The Lost 1984 Mac Video

An anonymous reader writes "Never seen video footage of the introduction of the Macintosh in January 1984 was published for the first time on the Internet today. Renowned Mac user Scott Knaster kept that Betamax video tape for 21 years, and German media agency TextLab has unearthed this only surviving video tape of the launch." They could probably use more mirrors for the 22MB movie.

21 of 636 comments (clear)

  1. Thanks for the help by CGP314 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    They could probably use more mirrors for the 22MB movie.

    You could do something useful and make a torrent before posting the story to slashdot.


    -Colin

  2. Re:Corniest.video.ever.. by therevolution · · Score: 3, Insightful

    WTF? If you saw that in 1984, you'd be cheering too.

  3. Re:Betamax? by zakezuke · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Does anyone else find it oddly fitting that this was preserved on a Betamax tape?

    They likely mean Betacam not betamax. But who knows.

    --
    There is no sanctuary. There is no sanctuary. SHUT UP! There is no shut up. There is no shut up.
  4. Re:Patience, honey. by Rei · · Score: 3, Insightful

    "They could probably use more mirrors for the 22MB movie."

    I have 5 words to say about this statement:

    BitTorrent, BitTorrent, BitTorrent, BitTorrent, BitTorrent.

    --
    People said I was dumb, but I proved them.
  5. Re:How about a bittorrent? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    YES, you limp dipshit. "Do Macs support torrents" indeed.

  6. Re:http is such a great transfer mechanism by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    now just imagine if every major ISP in the US didn't give us all such rediculously low upload caps in hopes of making "businesses" pay more for the exact same line with an increased upload speed. The world may very well come to an end!

  7. Re:Corniest.video.ever.. by lokedhs · · Score: 4, Insightful

    No, not corny at all. Remember that this was 1984. This was back when the C64 was considered state of the art. The PC programs were text only. Most people in the audience had never seen anything like that before.

  8. Re:PC competition for the Mini-MAC? by Tsiangkun · · Score: 2, Insightful

    You can't find a more real computer that has aseperate video card, tiny form factor, rock solid OS, includes software to get productive, and comes with a warranty.

    If you really want to impress your wife, try listening to her.

    Yeah yeah, it's a troll. He posted a whole topic about it last week.

  9. Re:Betamax? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    PLease link me to an article stating that Betamax is better for long time archiving than VHS.

  10. Unscrupulous by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Then the record companies could call open season and track all the ips of people downloading as some excuse that they might have downloaded other illegal things with it by using their open connections... sigh...

  11. Re:Mirror by daveschroeder · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Because I made the torrent, I'm hosting the torrent, I'm providing the tracker for the torrent, and I'm seeding the torrent with three servers.

  12. Re:Betamax? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    You're just inviting the ignoramous tools who don't know the difference between BetaMAX and BetaCAM.

  13. Re:How do you say... by coopaq · · Score: 2, Insightful
    Q: Wie sagen Sie Slashdotted auf Deutsch?

    A: Slashdotted

  14. Re:PC competition for the Mini-MAC? by binder520 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    "Me, I'd prefer not to spend $500 for a machine whose specs are met by the three year old laptop I'm using right now." You have a 1.25 GHz G4 on your 3 year old laptop?

  15. Re:Man We were easily impressed back then. by Drakonian · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Since then, has there been anything else as revolutionary as the Mac was at the time? I can't think of any. It really *was* something to get excited about.

    --
    Random is the New Order.
  16. Re:Who has a copy of the SLASHDOT-L Mac intro thre by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    You do realize that these kids are too young to get this joke? BITNET is probably meaningless to them.

  17. Re:It strikes me that Jobs was an asshole his whol by michaeldot · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Most people would probably agree with you, even those who know Jobs personally.

    And yet, without Jobs to goad people into stroking his ego, there would have been no Mac, no NeXTSTEP, no Apple post-1997, no iMac, no iPod, no standards of excellence in GUI computing.

    Sometimes it takes an asshole to make a dent in the universe.

  18. Amiga by Ostie · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I don't see what's amazing about Macintosh classic when 1 year later Amiga came with colorful graphics(up to 4096 colors), a real preemptive multitask OS and all the hot stuff. You could actualy format a disk drive while printing and doing some other stuff while on Mac you had to wait in front of a black & white screen.

    1. Re:Amiga by b1t+r0t · · Score: 2, Insightful
      The Amiga's fate was probably sealed when Commodore bought out Amiga. The Mac had the charismatic Jobs and his trademark Reality Distortion Field, with serious attempts at making a business computer. And the Amiga had Commodore, who just kind of threw it out there, expected people to play games on it and otherwise treated it as a shiny toy.

      Another difference is that while Amiga focused on flashy hardware, Apple focused on a solid user interface. It's a lot easier to be backwards compatible with software than it is with hardware. Amiga was pretty much doomed to have to re-implement the same chipset and video modes in every future version, where Quickdraw on the Mac, and discouraging direct writes to the video hardware (which was just a simple bitmap to begin with), allowed Apple the flexibility to change the graphics hardware.

      --

      --
      "Open source is good." - Steve Jobs
      "Open source is evil." - Microsoft
  19. Re:Who has a copy of the SLASHDOT-L Mac intro thre by Shag · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Yeah... the fact that it got rated "insightful" is amusing in its own way.

    --
    Village idiot in some extremely smart villages.
  20. mac cost by hawk · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Even in the 80's, Macintosh was (generally) only significantly more expensive than the cheap brands. If you compared it to the better built and more expensive brands fitted with comparable video and sound, there wasn't much difference (in most cases).

    The 5 year typical service life of a mac compared to 3 years for dos/windows typically made it less expensive than even the cheap brands over the long term.

    And once you factored in support costs in a business, the mac made up for the purchase price difference in the first year or two (there was about a 4:1 factor there!)

    hawk