Slashdot Mirror
MSN Search Has Arrived
strikehosting writes "The new MSN Search, "the first-ever search engine built from the ground up by Microsoft", has been launched worldwide. It will be available in 25 markets and 10 languages.
A few features though, like MSN Music and 'Search Near Me', are available only in the United States.
Sporting a cleaner look and a simplified layout, MSN Search has a more prominent position on the home page. The features that are available here include tabs that allow consumers to target searches to the Web, news, images, music, desktop or Microsoft Encarta."
Can't see what this would possibly give over Google or other great search engines. What possible benefit could Microsoft give to this that is not already there? Why bother reinventing the wheel, except for the purpose of desktop domination?
First post?
Tesla was a genius. Edison however was a overrated hack who liked to torture puppies.
They just don't get it. The reason people use Google is because it loads fast and just works. It doesn't take forever to load with flash animations, and other crap no one needs. When you want to search you go to Google. If you want to be bombarded with media and advertisements there are plenty of other sites on the internet.
Introducing Microsoft Vacuum 1.0 The first Microsoft product that doesn't suck.
I know people keep posting stuff along the lines of "oh deary me... this might kill Google", but no. It doesn't have to. MSN Search may take market share away from Google, but the people using it will be the ones who haven't figured out how to change the default search in IE, or set the homepage to something other than MSN. So, Google will hopefully become a search engine for the clueful, whilst the AOLers and WebTV people use MSN search.
We had to modify our sites to remove session IDs when MSNBot comes by to cut the traffic.
I still will be setting the home-page setting of all my users to www.google.com
On a 56K connection Microsoft's effort is still slow and clunky.
Moneyed corporations, non-working 'poor' and criminal prisoners are turning productive citizens into tax-slaves.
How can one be cluttered and the other elegant, if one is a "carbon copy" of the other?
Meythinks you are a fool!
Google has a number of advantages, like:
- Repeat the search on USENET, Images and Froogle
- No heavy graphics
- Spell checking
- Indexes and converts PDF and other formats.
Also, it returned results from the United Kingdom, even though the UK only box wasn't ticked!Also, the layout and the sponsored links are a blatant ripoff of Google.
Like tinyurl, but one letter less! http://qurl.co.uk/
With Microsoft, who gives a shit? Remember their "big security push"? Nothing came of it. Everyone who has a clue knows you can't just "bolt on" security in a couple of months. It was all about marketing, not product. Just like monkey-boy's "developers, developers, developers" - all hype, no content.
I checked the server logs at work yesterday, and for every legit visitor over the last 10 days there were 8 attempts to "hack in" using Winblows security holes (stupid script kiddies - why don't you at least check to see what OS is running before repeatedly trying different methods - oh, right, you're Microsnot Fanbois).There's a LOT of msnbots (MicroSoft Nuisance roBOTs) out there.
Instead of wasting time and resources on a search engine, they should first fix their piece of shit insecure operating system. Or maybe they can use google's search engine to find a patch? Buy a clue?
What the world needs isn't a Microsoft search engine - it's for Microsoft to clean up their own mess.
You know, there were search engines that existed before Google. All of them consisted of a search box and a submit button, with a few links to change what kind of search you wanted to run.
I really can't wait until the time comes when Google is obsolete, and we instead have thousands of stories about a different company that say "OMG JHOIM INTRODUCES USENET SEARCH! WOOT!"
For more information, click here.
Everyone is biased.
Encarta is edited by professional editors, and as such it has a standard of integrity which Microsoft's customers expect.
Wikipedia is edited by bored Internet users, and as such it bears a disclaimer that it is "for entertainment purposes only."
I would much sooner trust Encarta than Wikipedia for encyclopedic knowledge, in much the same way that I'd trust any other journalistic source than a bunch of bored Internet users to edit my news.
For more information, click here.
Examples?
I tried the query you suggested in MSN and got a number of very useful C# learning resources that I used in the past when I was picking up the language. Google returned sites with information on the language and comparisons. I wouldn't say either is worse than the other, they are just different. MSN also returned the Mono homepage on the first page.
frankly unless i tell a search engine to look for canadian webpages i DO NOT WANT it to go ahead and put them first.
I'm searching the WORLD WIDE WEB here not the canadian web. Sometimes its usefull but for the most part i find it a pain.
Yes, but if you spell it the US way:
"12 inches in centimeters"
MSN Search gives you the answer.
Yes, MSN Search does have that feature. It may not be as good as Google's version, but it's there.