A: for each Key you'd have a file, at worst, so 131181 files B: alot of the keys and values are pretty uselss and totaly OVERKILL i think C: many and i mean MEANY keys and subkeys are like/network/adapter/stuff1,stuff2,stuff3 D: there is much duplication of keys and values.
So there would nto be 131181 files, no where near theres alot of stuff in there thats pretty weird to have in there registry is prone to bloat, at least it used to be and probably still is some of the stuff in there is more suited to a/var or/tmp then the registry it makes mvoeing configs across installs or frmo 1 system to another damned hard.
Now what makes me sure it was the wrong way is linux uses config files, and a linux system with a full package install seems ot have ALOT more software to configure then windows, so how come linux can easily use config files and windows can't? windows can't need that much config data??
config files are alot easier to edit, change and debug then the registry, as you have many MANY tools that can read and manipulate text files. grep, find, whatever.
if you set the refresh rate on a new moniter to high it just turns off and puts up a message saying that its to high. Been like this for at least 5+ years, probably more.
The warnings are in there because waaaaaaaaay back in the day, yes you could damage a moniter by setting the refresh to high, but no longer. On a mondren moniter its safe to safe there is NO way to damage it with normal hardware via software.
*GASP* let the consumer decide what he/she wants and pay ONLY for it??!?! what a radical idea, nah it'll never work, consumers dont' know what they want, only big companies with big bidgets for "market and trend research" know what people want.
Didn't they have to drill a hole in the glass and he tried many diffrent glasses?
that kinda leads me to belive that it IS impossible to shatter a regular wineglass by voice, amped or not. To me that kinda ruins it because its no longer just a glass, its a speical glass, like if you made special weak wine glasses for this.
umm thats exactly what he said, production cost == cost != market value.
selling below cost is not allowed most of the time i would hope and selling below market value but above cost is perfectly ok and that is compitition and part of a free market.
i agree, except that for private use by private citizens it should be free, while companies that wish to use said GIS data, any publicly paid for and collected data, have to pay.
It can be considered fair use, as long as they are not allowing users to view entire books.
Ie, research of some sorts (translating, search algos ect) so eithre way will have to wait to see what google does before any conclusion can be made. Someone else posted a good reply summing up what google prints is and why its pretty much fair use, but i to lazy to go find it again.
Either way you are right, books != internet at all.
well, to get technical, every website you view is a copy of the orginal content sent to you computer... and then your computer might copy it to cache, or a proxy/ISP server might also cache it.
With digital, you can not "move" something, you copy and delete/overwrite the orginal:)
otherwise to be a pro athleat in tip top shape you only need to excersise any given muscle for 2 hours a week to be the strongest? bullshit, please prove that.
they way i see it C/C++ have EVERYTHING you need to program. They have freedom and give you enough rope to hang yourslef and the rest of your dev team. pointers, gotos, whatever. You can make it do anything.
all the new langs seem to limit what you can do to prevent bad programmers from screwing up. no gotos, no pointers, no memory management, and in some no preprocessor.
I always hear people saying java/C#/whatever is better, and then really its just forceing people to follow decent design guides and not letting them hang themselves.
But really use whatever works best for the job. poor programmers shouldn't be allowed to come near C/C++ code
i took histrorical geologly in uni, and the "snowball earth" is just a theory and a poor one at that. Its centers aroudn some event setting off a runaway glaciation untill the entire earth was covered in snow.
If it DID happen and all life was extingiushed, and the entire world was coverd in snow/ice, the snow would reflect sunlight and lower the tempatures even more, also block sunlight from heating the oceans and lower temps yet again.
you would never beable to get out of the iceage again or something like that.
or something like that, there were many holes in the theory that was diccused in class but not my major so i didn't pay much attention:)
either way its NOT a thory considered even remotly viable by most geologists (acording to my prof)
hmmm really: www.eia.doe.gov/neic/infosheets/electricgeneration .htm america: coal 50% nukes, 20%, hydro 7% yes majority, but still 20% is a fair amount
and look at 6.3 World Net Electricity Generation by Type, 2002
we see that the world totals are: World Totals fossil fuels 9,905.81 hydro: 2,619.10 Nuclear 2,546.01 total: 15,363.07
so fossil is 64% of the WORLD and 34% is nuke or hydro. Considering fossil is older its no wonder it generates more, yet still 34% is a fair bit. but again your missing the point.
not only is it moveing the source of generation to more efficent and cleaner stations, burning coal/gas/oil in central places like a powerplant allow you to put in expensive scrubbers to clean the air, and use more efficent converion metholds. cars will never be that clean OR efficent.
also once hydrogen is used to power cars and fueling stations are widespread, it hopefully can be used to power more things like generators and anything needing portable power.
and personaly i'd much rather have a few fossil plants somewhere far away and all the cars in the city no longer putting chemicals and pollutants into the air I breath thank you.
your missing the point, the advantage to hydrogen is taht you can make it from any source of eletrical power, be it coal, hydro, solar, nuke, fusion, oil, whatever.
so hydrogen cars wouldn't be restricted to fossil fuels, or any 1 type. That is the main advantage.
Slashdot Mirror
on my 10D
JPG ~2mb
RAW ~8mb
TIFF 16mb for 8bit 32mb for 16bit (RAW is 10b i belive) LZW won't help much
she should shoot in raw, it does WONDERS for any photo almost as you can correvt ev and WB on the raw sensor data, but it is another step
131181 keys, and 291410 values
/network/adapter/stuff1,stuff2,stuff3
/var or /tmp then the registry
A: for each Key you'd have a file, at worst, so 131181 files
B: alot of the keys and values are pretty uselss and totaly OVERKILL i think
C: many and i mean MEANY keys and subkeys are like
D: there is much duplication of keys and values.
So there would nto be 131181 files, no where near
theres alot of stuff in there thats pretty weird to have in there
registry is prone to bloat, at least it used to be and probably still is
some of the stuff in there is more suited to a
it makes mvoeing configs across installs or frmo 1 system to another damned hard.
Now what makes me sure it was the wrong way is linux uses config files, and a linux system with a full package install seems ot have ALOT more software to configure then windows, so how come linux can easily use config files and windows can't? windows can't need that much config data??
config files are alot easier to edit, change and debug then the registry, as you have many MANY tools that can read and manipulate text files. grep, find, whatever.
Use a new computer before you talk.
if you set the refresh rate on a new moniter to high it just turns off and puts up a message saying that its to high.
Been like this for at least 5+ years, probably more.
The warnings are in there because waaaaaaaaay back in the day, yes you could damage a moniter by setting the refresh to high, but no longer. On a mondren moniter its safe to safe there is NO way to damage it with normal hardware via software.
*GASP* let the consumer decide what he/she wants and pay ONLY for it??!?! what a radical idea, nah it'll never work, consumers dont' know what they want, only big companies with big bidgets for "market and trend research" know what people want.
No, the way it is now is perfect, you can use whatever TLD you own for whatever purpose you want to.
Its the internet man, no rules!
Didn't they have to drill a hole in the glass and he tried many diffrent glasses?
that kinda leads me to belive that it IS impossible to shatter a regular wineglass by voice, amped or not. To me that kinda ruins it because its no longer just a glass, its a speical glass, like if you made special weak wine glasses for this.
that is really a fantastic idea i think, everytime someone buys data about you you get paid, i mean it is YOUR data isn't it?
If someone like that was done i probably not care about anyone selling my info because you'd beable to see who was buying it to.
are coal powerplants and mines insured for damage caused to the people living next to them?
you get a life,
its his choice if he wants to care about others in the world who are suffering or not as it is yours.
so just because others don't have the same beleifs as you, doesn't mean you can get panties in a bunch and he an asshole.
i would pay 10$-30$ more for a near scratch proof watch/ipod....
umm thats exactly what he said, production cost == cost != market value.
selling below cost is not allowed most of the time i would hope
and selling below market value but above cost is perfectly ok and that is compitition and part of a free market.
umm shouldn't anything that large be handled by a REAL database?
i agree, except that for private use by private citizens it should be free, while companies that wish to use said GIS data, any publicly paid for and collected data, have to pay.
It can be considered fair use, as long as they are not allowing users to view entire books.
Ie, research of some sorts (translating, search algos ect) so eithre way will have to wait to see what google does before any conclusion can be made. Someone else posted a good reply summing up what google prints is and why its pretty much fair use, but i to lazy to go find it again.
Either way you are right, books != internet at all.
well, to get technical, every website you view is a copy of the orginal content sent to you computer... and then your computer might copy it to cache, or a proxy/ISP server might also cache it.
With digital, you can not "move" something, you copy and delete/overwrite the orginal:)
well as i understand it they only did dev for the mac because it would prove they weren't a monopoly, and they stopped doing it years ago.
somehow i dont' belive that
otherwise to be a pro athleat in tip top shape you only need to excersise any given muscle for 2 hours a week to be the strongest? bullshit, please prove that.
they way i see it C/C++ have EVERYTHING you need to program. They have freedom and give you enough rope to hang yourslef and the rest of your dev team.
pointers, gotos, whatever. You can make it do anything.
all the new langs seem to limit what you can do to prevent bad programmers from screwing up. no gotos, no pointers, no memory management, and in some no preprocessor.
I always hear people saying java/C#/whatever is better, and then really its just forceing people to follow decent design guides and not letting them hang themselves.
But really use whatever works best for the job. poor programmers shouldn't be allowed to come near C/C++ code
i took histrorical geologly in uni, and the "snowball earth" is just a theory and a poor one at that. Its centers aroudn some event setting off a runaway glaciation untill the entire earth was covered in snow.
If it DID happen and all life was extingiushed, and the entire world was coverd in snow/ice, the snow would reflect sunlight and lower the tempatures even more, also block sunlight from heating the oceans and lower temps yet again.
you would never beable to get out of the iceage again or something like that.
or something like that, there were many holes in the theory that was diccused in class but not my major so i didn't pay much attention:)
either way its NOT a thory considered even remotly viable by most geologists (acording to my prof)
ltos of speices no longer exist, i seem to remember a number like 99% of all speices to ever exist are now extinct
hmmm really: www.eia.doe.gov/neic/infosheets/electricgeneration .htm
s p?x=454&oid=779
america: coal 50% nukes, 20%, hydro 7%
yes majority, but still 20% is a fair amount
http://www2.nrcan.gc.ca/es/erb/erb/english/View.a
canada: 60% hydro, 16% nuke, 20% fossil fuels
the majority is hydro.
IN FACT! if we go here:
http://www.eia.doe.gov/emeu/iea/elec.html
and look at 6.3 World Net Electricity Generation by Type, 2002
we see that the world totals are:
World Totals
fossil fuels 9,905.81
hydro: 2,619.10
Nuclear 2,546.01
total: 15,363.07
so fossil is 64% of the WORLD and 34% is nuke or hydro. Considering fossil is older its no wonder it generates more, yet still 34% is a fair bit. but again your missing the point.
not only is it moveing the source of generation to more efficent and cleaner stations, burning coal/gas/oil in central places like a powerplant allow you to put in expensive scrubbers to clean the air, and use more efficent converion metholds. cars will never be that clean OR efficent.
also once hydrogen is used to power cars and fueling stations are widespread, it hopefully can be used to power more things like generators and anything needing portable power.
and personaly i'd much rather have a few fossil plants somewhere far away and all the cars in the city no longer putting chemicals and pollutants into the air I breath thank you.
so go suck a tailpipe form a fossil fuel car
your missing the point, the advantage to hydrogen is taht you can make it from any source of eletrical power, be it coal, hydro, solar, nuke, fusion, oil, whatever.
so hydrogen cars wouldn't be restricted to fossil fuels, or any 1 type. That is the main advantage.
well thats fucked up
i think your talking about anywhere BUT canada?
when i was in highschool i just plugged in a laptop, used the right static IP and could do whatever i wanted:)
district office REALLY didn't like encrypted traffic going in and out via ssh thou..
problem is even with nintendo gone sony and MS would still be trying to control the market so neither would be a monopoly