Slashdot Mirror
Who's Really Responsible In Online Banking Fraud?
TheRealStyro writes "According to this article a Miami businessman is suing a bank because of a fraudulent fund transfer possibly caused by the coreflood virus/trojan. He claims the bank is responsible because the bank failed to protect him from known online banking risks. It is obvious that this guy should have had an anti-virus package active, but shouldn't the bank have questioned such a large transfer to a republic of the former Soviet Union (these republics having gained the unfortunate notoriety of being dens of villainy and hackerdom)?"
I told you not to lock them in a room with computers. This is EXACTLY what I said would happen. *shrugs and walks off*
FuckTheFuckingFuckers.com - Post your th
... Slashdot is making a bold new move in its use of story formatting.
== Jez ==
Do you miss Firefox? Try Pale Moon.
ROFLMAO
Linux, you magnificent bastard, I read the fucking manual!
Maybe paypal should be incharge.
Me: Hello paypal someone cracked your systems and stole my balance.
PayPal: Oh really? Tough Titties! *click*
Me: WTF Mate?
What could possibly go wrong?
its part of a new ad revenue campaign. studies have shown that users are more apt to click ad's when they see bold text in the site.
I await the "In Soviet Russia, banks overdraft you!" comments.
There are 2 types of people in the world, those who find that stupid binary joke funny, and those who don't.