Slashdot Mirror
Oakland County to go Wireless
y00nix writes "Oakland County, MI has plans to roll out a wireless Internet access program dubbed "Wireless Oakland" covering all 910 square miles inside the county. County Executive L. Brooks Patterson unveiled the plans at last night's State of the County address. Additional press coverage via the Oakland Press, and the The Detroit News." Similar in concept to Philadelphia's plans covered yesterday.
Grand Haven, MI has had this for months now.
Their service has expanded quite a bit and they are planning on covering a 3 county area within 2 years.
works great, and is not a government run operation as proposed in many other places.
Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
Anyone in Oakland right now is encouraged to help beta test the network. All you need is an 802.11 enabled card, and the SSID is 'linksys.'
If you're having any trouble, just go ahead and access http://192.168.1.1. Leave the username box blank and the password is 'admin.'
Thanks.
...Complete control of a large chain of wi-fi zombie PC's in the waiting.
I would be angry if my local government did something like this. Wireless networks are something private companies could provide, instead of using government tax dollars that could be better used for schools, roads, and real public projects that would serve the public.
Wireless Internet is something only a small segment of the population would take advantage of, and most should be able to afford it on their own.
I love how slashdot cheers big government projects that intrude further in our lives, yet hate big government at the same time. You can't have it both ways.
Will the sales tax rise because of this?
(from a related link on the article)
Q: If I leave Oakland County, will my computer work?
A: Of course. But you might have to revert back to a wired connection, at least until the whole nation goes wireless.
This is great for many reasons:
1. When the government runs the ISPs, it means that law enforcement can monitor what you browse online. No need for search warrants anymore!
2. It is not like wireless technology changes or evolves, so I am sure a wireless purchase now will be good for the next 40 years.
3. Poor people need low-cost wireless access. After all, brand new laptops configured for wireless access are cheap, but that $8 a month fee for internet access is just WAY too expensive.
4. There are way too many choices. Who actually wants to CHOOSE there ISP, when the government can make all the choices for them. After all, Oakland county does such a great job fixing the roads, lowering crime, and protecting the enviornment... how could they NOT do a better job.
5. The government can make sure that dangerous information is not accessible. We can make sure that p2p music file sharing is not possible, and since we already require certain websites not be available in public schools and libraries, obviously the ban will also apply to public wireless.
...and while I really, really like the sound of this, I'm more interested in seeing what sort of impact this'll have on cable and DSL prices in the area. It seems to me that Comcast, SBC and Wide Open West will have a much more difficult time convincing people to pay $60/month for broadband access when they can get adequate service without wires or hardware for free.
I don't think this sort of WiFi would have the speed to keep me happy, but I definitely think my parents and most of my family would be perfectly happy with it, and I certainly wouldn't mind seeing it drive my cable bill down $10 or $20/month.
Entrepreneur : (noun), French for "unemployed"
Let's say skype runs on my PDA and my smartphone. And wireless is provided for free country-wide.
=> wireless telephony has just become free.
i would be surprised if the cell operators wouldn't put up a massive lobbying effort against this. in the end, the goverment takes over their business and gives it away for free.
not that i or anyone else ever having to deal with cingular customer service would mind.