U.S. Denies Patent on Part-Human Hybrid
jimkski wrote to mention a Boston Globe story involving the refusal of a patent claim on a genetically engineered creature. From the article: "A New York scientist's seven-year effort to win a patent on a laboratory-conceived creature that is part human and part animal ended in failure Friday, closing a historic and somewhat ghoulish chapter in U.S. intellectual property law."
.. if he'd hired Disneys lawyers.
Nah, this is more likely because of the republican administration and the likely implication of granting this patent.
What? A bunch of human-monkey hybrids that will certainly vote Democrat?!
You are in a maze of twisty little passages, all alike.
There goes my retirement plan!!
I was going to have some kids, patent them... then collect royalties off them when they have kids...
That way I could retire with relative ease.
Can't wait to get started on my perfect pet!
creature that is part human and part animal
wow, talk about prior art.....
The only way to get rid of a temptation is to yield to it.
-Oscar Wilde
"Nice to see - my faith in the Patent system has raised slightly from 'completely hopeless' to 'mostly hopeless'"
Funny, my opinion went from 'harmless' tp 'mostly harmless'.
Do we have a right to play God?
We're not playing god. We're playing "code monkey". The language just happens to be DNA and we're reverse engineering a set of programs doen by a vastly supurior coder... sorta like a VB programmer trying to understand and modify the vi source code.
"There are more things in heaven and earth, Horatio, than are dreamt of in your philosophy."