Slashdot Mirror


Round the World Flight Set for Monday

An anonymous reader writes "LiveScience is now reporting that Burt Rutan's GlobalFlyer is set for Monday takeoff. The plane, piloted by Steve Fossett, has been grounded since January by weather. The mission: the first solo, nonstop circumnavigation of the globe via jet powered craft without refueling." Commentary also available from the BBC.

20 of 129 comments (clear)

  1. Other notable Circumnavigation attempts: by GillBates0 · · Score: 5, Informative
    available in this Wikipedia article.

    The first successful nonstop, nonrefueling flight was made by Dick Rutan and Jeana Yeager in their Scaled Composites Model 76 Voyager back in 1986. That one wasn't solo though.

    --
    An Indian-American Hindu committed to non-violent thought/speech/action alarmed by the global explosion of radical Islam
  2. Pfft. by ColonelFubster · · Score: 4, Informative

    Hal & Viola Leveller fly to Laughlin, Nevada from Southern California every week without refueling. And you don't see them being the subject of an article on Slashdot.

    --
    :-M
  3. It's a matter of terminology by ergo98 · · Score: 3, Informative

    In this context, the term circumnavigate historically meant by boat or ship, however recently aircraft have been added. Spacecraft aren't included in this illustrious set.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Circumnavigation

  4. first with a Jet engine by Bart+van+der+Ouderaa · · Score: 4, Informative

    Burt was the first with an airplane, but it was powered by props. Steve is trying to be the first with a jet engine. A single jet engine in this case.

    1. Re:first with a Jet engine by flyingsquid · · Score: 2, Informative

      Spirit of Saint Louis was built with one engine because two engines increased the probability of engine failure. Extra engines are safer but only if you can fly with one not functioning. I'm going to guess that continuing the flight across the Atlantic on a single engine wasn't a realistic possibility with the technology of the day.

  5. Re:Hasn't it been done before? by YrWrstNtmr · · Score: 2, Informative
    Not sure on this, but I don't think there's even been a space flight that has done this with a one person crew.

    The many NASA Mercury flights, and the first set of Russian flights.

  6. Re:Hasn't it been done before? by Colgate2003 · · Score: 2, Informative
    Most of the early orbital flights were solo. If not, why was Yuri Gagarin the "first person to orbit the Earth;" singular?

    John Glenn did it for the Americans soon after.

  7. Re:Hasn't it been done before? by mlush · · Score: 3, Informative
    Not sure on this, but I don't think there's even been a space flight that has done this with a one person crew. Don't have the patience to search it, I'm at the in-laws this weekend...slow dialup.

    I think a chap called Yuri Gagarin may qualify, and if he does not another Russian or one of the Mercury pilots definatly will

    It may come as a suprise to you, but it is possible to store information in this thing called a brain

  8. woo woo by jbridge21 · · Score: 3, Informative
  9. Re:Hasn't it been done before? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    "Spaceship == Space
    Aircraft == Air
    "

    Space is just an arbitrary definition on where the atmosphere ends. It has no real justification other than the fact that atmospheric forces (such as friction) are significantly less. But that could be said of the upper atmosphere that isn't considered space. At a cruising altitude of 100,000 feet, the X-43 didn't experience the same forces as a 747 experiences, but the X-43 is still considered an aircraft. Before you enter space you are flying in an aircraft and when you reenter the atmosphere you are flying in an aircraft. Why then would your spacecraft not be considered an aircraft for its entire flight?

    "Think before asking silly questions mmmkay?"

    He/She did. Accepting the party line that space and air are concrete and different things makes life easy but doesn't really help describe the significance of major events, like the first solo around the world flight in the 60s by the Soviet Union.

  10. Much better link by caryw · · Score: 4, Informative

    Much more information suitable to the slashdot crowd is available at:
    http://www.virginatlanticglobalflyer.com/
    We don't like press releases or watered down news articles.
    Also, I bet the US government has some recon plane that has/can do something like this. I know it's possible with mid-air refueling but I bet they can do it without. Just my $0.02
    - Cary
    --Fairfax Underground: Where Fairfax County comes out to play

  11. Re:Why is this cool? by Moofie · · Score: 2, Informative

    Surely you're aware that Rutan's first design was one that you (YOU!) could literally build in your garage, right?

    --
    Why yes, I AM a rocket scientist!
  12. Re:around the north part you mean... by srblackbird · · Score: 3, Informative

    That's so NOT true ! The FAI's rules state that a record attempt like this must start and finish at the same airfield and cross all meridians of the globe. What's more the course must not be less than the very precise figure of 36,787.559 kilometres (around 23,000 miles) which is equal in length to the Tropic of Cancer. To allow the Virgin Atlantic GlobalFlyer to catch the vital jet stream winds, the FAI rules don't oblige that record attempts follow the imaginary line of the Tropic itself but simply that the distance flown exceeds it. That doesn't mean, however, that Steve Fossett could fly across the Poles. The course must also be kept away from the North and South "Frigid Zones", defined as being at latitudes of over 66degrees33minutes.

    --
    "The test of the morality of a society is what it does for it's children." -Dietrich Bonhoeffer
  13. Re:around the north part you mean... by grozzie2 · · Score: 2, Informative
    The formal definition of a 'round the world' is that it must pass over 2 points that are diametrically opposed on the globe, cross every line of longitude, with a landing location at or 'past' the point of departure, defined as either landing at or overflying the point of departure after completing the other requirements. That doesn't mean around the equator. Your 'run around the north pole' will qualify, if, it also includes a pass over the south pole, and returns you to the point of departure, landing there, or somewhere past it after passing over it.

    Your definition is, well, lame.

  14. Re:'Round the World in 80 Hours by legirons · · Score: 2, Informative

    285 mph - does that sound like an 87-hour trip when you do the calculations?

  15. Hal and Viola Leveller by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    Hal and Viola Leveller are characters on the Phil Hendrie radio show. The recurring gag is that they call in to the show during their flight to Laughlin, and get into very animated discussions with Phil when they should be concentrating on flying their plane.

    It's not the funniest skit on the show, but it is mildly entertaining. I personally prefer Phil's commentary to his skits.

  16. Clarification about around the world by Foo2rama · · Score: 3, Informative

    The FAI's rules state that a record attempt like this must start and finish at the same airfield and cross all meridians of the globe. What's more the course must not be less than the very precise figure of 36,787.559 kilometres (around 23,000 miles) which is equal in length to the Tropic of Cancer. To allow the Virgin Atlantic GlobalFlyer to catch the vital jet stream winds, the FAI rules don't oblige that record attempts follow the imaginary line of the Tropic itself but simply that the distance flown exceeds it.

    with FAI being Federation Aeronautique Internationale (FAI) - the world's air sports federation.

    Go Rutan, first non-stop around the world (voyager.) First Civilain plane into space (spaceship one,)and now this

    This also does not include his incredibly well known kitbuilt aircraft long and veri ez's, the Beech starship, or the numerous military projects he has done.

    Rutan will most likly go down as one the most important aircraft designers of all time.

    --


    ---In a time of Chimpanzees I was a Monkey.
  17. Re:Does the pilot sleep? by balster+neb · · Score: 4, Informative

    According to the BBC article, he will be getting next to no sleep.

    Apparently he's pretty used to feats of endurance, and he holds records in aviation and sailing. Due to the nature of the aircraft and the flying conditions, he will constantly have to be at the controls. The only sleep he expects is in the form of 5 minute naps, for which an autopilot backup and countdown alarm will be available.

    His voyage will only take around 80 hours. The first around the world flight of this sort (in 1986) took about 9 days. The two pilots had to work in short shifts, but were severely fatigued at the end of the journey. This solo journey is possible for Steve Fossett because he is using a jet engine.

  18. Speaking of circumnavigation.... by MtViewGuy · · Score: 2, Informative

    ...I've heard that Boeing plans to do a very spectacular long-distance flight with the new 777-200 Long Range model.

    It sounds like Boeing might try to fly a 777-200LR with a completely stripped-out interior and loading it down with the weight equivalent of the interior parts plus standard cargo load in pre-cooled Jet A fuel. That could make it possible for the 777-200LR to fly as much as 13,000 nautical miles or so.

  19. Re:Route Taken? by gfreeman · · Score: 2, Informative

    Is there someway that we can see the planned route ...

    Yup, the BBC has a map of the planned route, here.

    --
    Ceci n'est pas un sig.