Slashdot Mirror


Next-gen Game Boy to Hit Stores This Year?

Jason writes "CNN's always enjoyable Game Over column has an interesting story up about Nintendo's plans to launch its next generation Game Boy in 2005, as opposed to the expected 2006 release. The column predicts official word on the new GBA will come during Satoru Iwata's keynote at GDC. As yet, no features are known, but author Chris Morris speculates this could just be an incremental step, rather than a full-fledged generational leap."

7 of 77 comments (clear)

  1. Risky.. by WhatAmIDoingHere · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Nintendo is flooding the portable gaming market with their Original GBA, the flip GBA, and the DS.. The DS is a strong unit, but lacks games. The GBA has like 5 different flavors. There are only so many people who are willing to upgrade their game libraries for a new Gameboy unit every year or two.

    --
    Not a Twitter sockpuppet... but I wish I was.
    1. Re:Risky.. by supersuckers · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I agree with the grandparent. Let's go through a timeline of nintendo's handhelds starting with the gameboy (ignoring before that):

      1989: gameboy launched
      1996: gameboy pocked launched (better screen, smaller, but same game system)
      1998: gameboy color launched. This is nine years after the original gameboy, and it still played gameboy games.
      2001: gameboy advance launched.
      2003: gameboy advance sp launched. Mostly cosmetic changes to the original gameboy advance.
      2004: nintendo DS launched. Backwards compatible with gameboy advance.

      What on earth are you crying about? We've basically got 3 systems since 1989, and each "new" one has been backwards compatible. The original gameboy advance game out in 2001. The DS was the next major change, in late 2004. Actually, can you name many other markets that have moved that SLOW???

  2. Must control wallet of death by Aerion · · Score: 4, Funny

    I already have a SP and DS. If Nintendo expects me to buy their next system, too, they're going to have to give it some really nice features, and a really promising game lineup.

    Or make it shiny.

  3. It's an analyst. by mcc · · Score: 4, Interesting

    It's an analyst.

    This is based on nothing but an analyst making stuff up. This should be given as much credence as "some guy on the internet thinks there will be a next-gen game boy this year". Only less, because at this point, given the previous track records of video game industry analysts, when they say something I for one consider it automatically less likely. If analysts were to be taken seriously, Nintendo by now would have gone bankrupt, become a third party publisher, began selling internet-playable games, and been selling VoIP software for the Nintendo DS.

    But anyhow. Even by itself this is incredibly unlikely. Nintendo tends to have a really really strong bond between its handhelds, both functionally-- the Gamecube was practically a peripheral for the GBA-- and from a marketing perspective. The Gamecube and GBA were released at nearly the same time, were they not? I am told developers got the dev kits for both at about the same time. But jumping the GBA2 way ahead of the Revolution, as this analyst predicts, would make it hard to establish "synergy" between the two, or whatever. Nintendo will probably be pushing the Revolution (their new console, which will be unveiled at E3 and probably ship sometime next year) and the GBA2 at the same time.

    The prediction then becomes even less likely because Nintendo is still right now smack dab in the middle of a major promotional push for the DS, and will be continuing this push for most of the year. They've still barely begun building that brand, and the games they originally promised would be out by the end of Q1 won't be all out until like the end of the summer. Developers still aren't all the way on board, and I don't think consumers will consider the DS fully "here" until all that originally-promised stuff, plus Mario Kart are out. So putting out a new GBA before this process is done would totally undermine any attempt for the DS to truly take root. "Pillars" or no, Nintendo doesn't have the PR resources to sell the public on two new handhelds at the same time. They'll need to get the DS established before they can start pitching the GBA2.

    Finally the specific plan this article is speculating on is way, way less likely than even the idea itself, since they claim the GBA will remain in stores after the GBA2 hits. Selling the GBA and GBA2 simultaneously would make no sense whatsoever. Among other things that would mean totally abandoning the "three pillars" whatsit they keep babbling about; they'd have four pillars.

    What would not surprise me is Nintendo announcing the GBA2 at E3 this year. But I think we'll see it at earliest simultaneous with the Revolution, and probably a little afterward.

    I think we might see it a little later than the Revolution for two reasons: first off, there's been vague and shadowy rumors about developers being shown the Revolution. Nothing about the GBA2. Second off, the GBA2 has a problem the DS doesn't. It has to justify itself. It's obvious why people with a GBA would buy a DS; it's got all this stuff, it's got the touchscreen and the 3D and it's just generally fucked up. It's obvious why someone buying a new handheld might choose a GBA rather than a DS; it's smaller and cheaper. What isn't obvious why anyone with a GBA or a DS would buy a GBA2. Nintendo is going to have to pull out a serious graphical update, something at least better than the PSP, while retaining both the small size and the position of best battery life, in order for the GBA2 to really make any sense (unless Nintendo's satisfied with just it being the GBA 1.1 and it almost entirely appealing to new purchasers rather than upgraders). I don't know how long it will take the technology to get where it needs to be for that to be possible.

  4. Read the Full GBA Report Here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

    Kotaku has the analyst's entire report. Check it out for all the nitty-gritty.

  5. New Game Boy should use DS chipset by drwiii · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Nintendo would be suicidal to play it any other way. The new Game Boy should use the DS chipset without the frills (touch screen, microphone, wireless, second display) with the same cartridge form factor. That way, existing DS owners will have "forward" compatibility with the new Game Boy offerings and Nintendo doesn't end up segmenting their market.

    1. Re:New Game Boy should use DS chipset by drwiii · · Score: 3, Interesting
      No, the point of using a scaled back DS chipset would be to ensure that "New Game Boy" games would be compatible with the DS. Nothing stops a DS executable from only initializing one screen, only using the D-Pad and buttons for input, etc. Existing DS games wouldn't be compatible with the "New Game Boy", obviously.

      I wouldn't be surprised if Nintendo's goal is to get a "stripped-down DS" out there as "the New Game Boy" for $75 or less. That way, they get their classic Nintendo price beachhead against Sony. And in the event DS software doesn't pan out, they won't get called on it since the DS would be "New Game Boy" software compatible.

      From a pricing standpoint, it would play out as the inverse of the timeline for the GBA and the GBA SP. Did Nintendo push their "deluxe" unit first in the form of the DS? Was the DS released to steal the higher spenders away from Sony before the PSP launched, only to bridge them over to "New Game Boy" software when the time is right?

      Only time will tell..