Game Makers Could Be Liable For Violent Games
Christopher Reimer writes "KOMO 4 News of Seattle, Washington, is reporting that state law makers are considering a bill that would make video game companies liable for illegal activity that players under 17 are responsible for. From the article: 'Should the people who make and sell "violent video" games be held accountable if someone commits a crime because of playing them?'"
Please do a modicum of research before makings posts such as the parent.
The suit to which zerkon refers was initially dismissed by the district court for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. The plaintiffs appealed to the 2nd Circuit, and that court has reversed a portion of the summary judgment. The plaintiffs haven't won at all, unless you count it as a victory that their case will get to trial.
But don't take my (or zerkon's) word for it: http://www.newstarget.com/003994.html
And in the future, this is a pretty useful site http://news.google.com/
I'm very much afraid that this is not the most stupid thing I have ever heard of.
A bad analogy is like a leaky screwdriver.