Slashdot Mirror


Old Film to DVD Transfers Examined

Richard W.M. Jones writes "Slate is running an interesting article on the process involved in Warner Brothers remastering films, the quality of the films being compared to the Criterion Collection discs. Going back to the original technicolor negatives, preserved in temperature-controlled rooms, the transfer begins with a 4,000 line scan, followed by digital alignment of each color." From the article: "In some ways, these DVDs have finer color and detail than even the original film prints. In the old days, it was difficult to align those three strips perfectly. The task became still harder years later, when the films were reissued, because the negatives had stretched or shrunk over time. If you need all three strips to get the right color, and you can't line the strips up precisely, then the colors and the sharpness are going to be a bit off."

3 of 306 comments (clear)

  1. Who gives a shit? by anonicon · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Yeah, nice article on the transfar and cleaning process, but really, who gives a shit? We won't be able to record them, and we'll have the pleasure of sucking from our master's teet to view them on our FCC- and Corporate-approved viewing stations.

    Someone wake me up when the content industries don't insist on being a bunch of monopolitive, skull-fucking assholes and *then* I might care about restored, super duper restorations.

  2. Re:Who Cares? by Oliver+Defacszio · · Score: 0, Offtopic
    Yes! Today's movies are innovative thinkpieces that absolutely do not exist solely to further the career of whom (or what) ever is "starring" and to add another layer of cash to the pockets of the producing studio.

    Tee hee.

    --

    -
    Inventor of the term 'pardon my French'.
  3. Re:damn you, MPAA! by pixelpusher220 · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    either...neither are very good warm ;-)


    --
    People in cars cause accidents....accidents in cars cause people :-D