Windows 2003 and XP SP2 Vulnerable To LAND Attack
An anonymous reader writes "Dejan Levaja, a Serbian security engineer has discovered that nearly 8 years after the attack was first made public, WIndows 2003 and Windows XP SP2 are in fact vulnerable to the historic LAND attack." Granted, you need to have the firewall turned off for this work, but there's a whole lotta machines that don't have it turned on.
It is also subject to sea and air attacks.
In other news, my computer is also prone to failing if I microwave it... hit it with a hammer, or attempt to install water cooling while I'm drunk...
---
Programming is like sex... Make one mistake and support it the rest of your life.
"Granted, you need to have the firewall turned off for this work, but there's a whole lotta machines that don't have it turned on."
Machines that are not protected are vulnerable. Well, that isn't really news is it? Sounds pretty silly to me.
Only one remote hole in the kernel FOR eight years!
You mean to tell me that XP and 2k3 contain buggy legacy code? that IS news!
Isn't this EXACTLY what regression tests were designed for?
There is a big list before the provided source code.
It may be a little thing called a firewall. A firewall is a spyware-like little piece of software that constantly pings a special server called a firedoor so that spammers hackers, and their ilk know when your computer is available on the internet. Unfortuntely Microsoft refuses to release a patch for this thing but a piece of software called a backdoor can be used to prevent the firewall from doing its dirty work. Download one today!
01 if by LAND, 10 if by SEA
At least with SP2 there is some basic security in terms of the firewall being on by default.
Still, never thought I'd see a slashdot article linking to a page about Trumpet Winsock in 2005!
Get a free iPod Nano 4GB!
Windows is one of the safest OS around (and to keep it that way it is advised that the computer should not be connected to internet or any other network for that matter)
fuvoo: watch something
So it's a way to either remotely lock up or reboot a target machine. I would assume (not having, you know, tried it or anything) that this includes most windows-based webservers.
A friend showed this to me a few days ago and I was unable to reproduce the attack over the LAN, both with my own code and some code of the original LAND found with google. Both were run from linux by opening a raw socket, filling in ip and tcp headers including checksums using the structs in ip.h and tcp.h, and sending with sendto(). In both cases ethereal would show the packet as recieved but the machine would operate normally.
If you think the majority of users are security minded like that, then why do you think the majority of users have so many problems that could be prevented in the first place by firewalls? Sorry, but my experience has been the opposite of your fairy tale.
I remember the days of Ping of Death, Land, Teardrop, New Tear, Bork, etc.
Now that my WinXP SP2 system is susceptible to land again, it's getting me into a nostalgic mood. I think I'll go play Ms PacMan on my MAME cabinet now.
I'm a big tall mofo.
Nobody deserves to get their Boxen hacked, even if they don't always use the best available defenses.
That is like saying the rape victim is at fault "'cause she looked so sexy"
That's a list of operating systems from 1997, taken out of an exploit from 1997. Linux 2.0.30? Novell 4.11? Solaris 2.5.1?
OS X is invulnerable to all attacks, because it's made of magic.
*snort*. You owe me a new keyboard.