Slashdot Mirror
Consumers Data Stolen from LexisNexis
LE UI Guy writes "Reuters is currently running a story regarding LexisNexis being tapped into by identity thieves who accessed up to 32,000 customer profiles. Information hit included names, addresses, Social Security and driver's license numbers. This comes on the heels of rival ChoicePoint being breached for 145,000 profiles last month in a similar case. Better check yourself." Update: 03/10 02:40 GMT by J : ChoicePoint's name corrected (and, it may be more than 145,000, they don't know).
Anyone got a torrent of it?
I am sure glad I don't drive a lexus.
boy.
This comes on the heals of rival Check Point being breached for 145,000 profiles last month in a similar case. Better check yourself.
Can someone post the list?
Here come the lawyers!!!
Visualize Whirled P.'s
are the worse at security on everything? Not just the OS, but everything about it. They spend 5x as much money and STILL they do not get it right.
Relax, this is free advertising for CheckPoint :)
Looks like Windows 2000/NT servers.
Unpatched ?
It can't be theft if the data is still there, right?
Try not. Do or do not, there is no try.
-- Dr. Spock, stardate 2822-3.
I am a man, not a number!
Signed, #6
Well of course they are not equal, you made the assignment that way.
You made the common rookie programmer error of assigning what you wanted to test.
What I think you meant to say was
ChoicePoint != CheckPoint
Though if you are communicating to us in Java you want
!ChoicePoint.equals(CheckPoint)
Hope that helps.
I'm changing my name to Holden McGroin. Let's see you try using that name in your ripoffs!
Strange women lying in ponds distributing swords is no basis for a system of government.
Very definitely. You need to immediately report to the Credit Correct Center nearest you. Please advise a family member to pick up the ashes in 9-10 business days.
The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
Surely this would (rightly) file under "false allegation"?
No, this would fall under "typo."
And don't call me Shirley.
Ironically, the word ironically is often used incorrectly.
And the first legal dispute you get into, and your 'corporate assets' get liquidated by the courts.
Oh, sorry, only one corporation per human. You lost yours. Bummer. Off to the mines.
Lost at C:>. Found at C.
No shit. I had this happen the other day, buying something at an electronics store.
Cashier, while checking out: "Your email address?"
Me: "No."
Cashier: "No?"
Me: "Ok, put 'no at no dot com"
Cashier, smirking: "Done."
What I think you meant to say was
ChoicePoint != CheckPoint
Though if you are communicating to us in Java you want
!ChoicePoint.equals(CheckPoint)
In perl, I just write
No chance of going wrong there.