Slashdot Mirror
FCC Opens More Spectrum for WISPs
flirzan writes "Today the FCC announced that they will be opening up new spectrum for use in wireless broadband applications. The new spectrum will run from 3650-3700 Mhz, and requires that licensees register all system base stations. This is great news for wireless ISPs everywhere, as it will make interference avoidance/mitigation much easier. Licenses will run 10 years, and are renewable and transferable. No word yet on how much the licenses are expected to cost or when they'll be available."
on the Mana Drain when they detonate?
or their lumber collecting abilities?
lysergically yours
This is good news for companies making mobile devices with lots of storage. After all, that storage is not very useful if there isn't infrastructure (i.e.: bandwidth) available to transfer data easily.
This might also help out community wireless attempts, since at least one part of the technology is being standardized, and the licenses are rather long (10 years).
This is surely a good thing, WISP's are currently operating using the ISM and UNII bands with extremely low EIRP levels.
The new rules are as follows:
"Fixed stations will be allowed to operate with a peak power limit of 25 Watts per 25 megahertz bandwidth, and mobile stations with a peak power limit of 1 Watt per 25 megahertz bandwidth."
Just how much of the spectrum is left for the FCC to pass out. And who dictates the spectrum elsewhere? Not to sound all Anti-American but the fcc is not all powerful.
Wait, are they?
Procrastinating life a way at a rapid rate of speed.
There should be several calsses of spectrum for WIFI data transit.
one spectrum range would be for station-to-station communications
one spectrum can be for user-to-station communications
one spectrum can be for user-to-user communications.
I am not a wireless engineer, so i dont know what frequencies are suitable for for what distances etc, but you should have one range for high-bandwidth medium-long range. (such as the spectrums mentioned here)
So multiple channels in a particular cell, in such a number of channels where you dont overlap channels in adjacent cells. (802.11[n])
Next you would have less bandwidth, more available channels and medium range. Finally you would have short range, medium badnwidth limited channels.... (bluetooth etc)
For those who can't get the PDF, here it is in plain text:
FCC OPENS ACCESS TO NEW SPECTRUM FOR
WIRELESS BROADBAND IN THE 3650 MHZ BAND
WASHINGTON, D.C. - Today, the Federal Communications Commission (FCC or
Commission) adopted rules to open access to new spectrum for wireless broadband in the 3650-3700
MHz band (3650 MHz). The Commission adopted a hybrid approach that draws from both the
Commission's unlicensed and licensed regulatory models and provides for nationwide, non-exclusive
licensing of terrestrial operations in the band utilizing technologies employing contention-based
protocols. This streamlined licensing mechanism with minimal regulatory entry requirements will
encourage multiple new entrants and stimulate the rapid expansion of wireless broadband services --
especially in rural America -- by Wireless Internet Service Providers (WISPs) and other entities with
limited resources. The Commission also provided an opportunity for the introduction at 3650 MHz of a
variety of new wireless broadband technologies, such as Wi-Max, into the band.
Under the Commission's approach, there is no limit on the number of licenses that can be
granted, and each licensee will be authorized to operate on a shared basis with other licensees on all 50
megahertz of the band, subject to restrictions in geographic areas occupied by grandfathered Fixed
Satellite Service (FSS) and Federal Government stations. Licensees will also be required to register all
system base stations electronically with the Commission. Base station registration will enable licensees
to locate each other's operations and will facilitate protection of grandfathered stations from interference.
This type of licensing and registration will enable the Commission to monitor the use of this spectrum as
new technologies and services develop.
The Commission found that the public record developed in this proceeding supports multiple
users sharing this spectrum through the use of "contention-based" protocols to minimize interference
among fixed and mobile operations. New fixed and mobile stations will therefore be required to use
contention-based protocols, which will reduce the possibility of interference from co-frequency operation
by managing each station's access to spectrum. The Commission concluded that this approach is a
reasonable, cost-effective method for ensuring that multiple users can access the spectrum.
The Commission gave all licensees the mutual obligation to cooperate and avoid harmful
interference to one another. Mobile stations also will be required to positively receive and decode an
enabling signal transmitted by a base station. The Commission determined that this approach will ensure
that mobile stations operate within range of registered base stations, thereby avoiding interference to grandfathered FSS and Federal Government stations. Fixed stations will be allowed to operate with a
peak power limit of 25 Watts per 25 megahertz bandwidth, and mobile stations with a peak power limit of
1 Watt per 25 megahertz bandwidth.
The Commission kept the existing allocations for the band, grandfathering previously licensed
primary incumbent FSS earth station operations and three Federal Government radiolocation stations,
entitling them to interference protection from new wireless licensees. To protect these incumbent
operations, the Commission established circular protection zones around them - 150 km for FSS earth
stations and 80 km for Federal Government stations - and prohibited new terrestrial licensees from
operating within these zones unless they negotiate agreements with the incumbents. The Commission
determined that new FSS stations should be allowed on a secondary basis and denied several petitions for
reconsideration of an earlier decision in this proceeding that established the existing FSS, FS and MS
allocations.
The Commission also concluded that there should be no eligibility restrictions
Nobody is going to pay millions of dollars to have to cooperate and share... millions are only payed when a monopoly is guaranteed.
--Mike--
Wireless Broadband Providers: You have your spectrum play-pen, now do yourselves a favor, and get the hell off the ISM bands with your 802.11x crap for your commercial endeavors. Thank you.
The total bandwidth seems small, only 50 MHz which is less than the 94 MHz of space available for 802.11b. Throw in the need for non-overlapping channels, interference, etc. and this version of wireless broadband will probably offer less bandwidth that original WiFi.
I can only hope that the higher emitted power will let service providers boost SNR (rather than space-out the antennas further) to provide more digital bandwidth within their limited radio bandwidth allotment.
Two wrongs don't make a right, but three lefts do.
A whole 50MHz chunk of bandwidth?
What would -you- do with all of it?
Three 14-MHz (70ish Mbps to nearby sites under good conditions) and one 7-MHz (35ish Mbps ditto) WiMAX base stations - times several antenna sectors, times several base stations in an array like cellphone sites.
Or maybe split it differently (like 3 or 5 7MHz channels for cells and 2 or 1 14s for networking the cells) to allow better signal quality in the cells by preventing channel reuse for some distance behind the cell.
You could (un)wire a whole city that way.
Bantam Dominique roosters crow a four-note song. Once you've heard it as "Happy BIRTHday" you can't NOT hear it that way
Isn't it interesting that when dealing with bands the huge companies don't want, the spectrum is licensed on a renewable basis, while spectrum that is particularly valuable (to the public that owns it) is sold out-right to big conglomerates?
ALL spectrum should be licensed like this new band is supposed to be. Viacom can afford it, believe me.
--GrouchoMarx
Card-carrying member of the EFF, FSF, and ACLU. Are you?
The new spectrum will run from 3650-3700 Mhz
Guess I'll need to add another layer to my tinfoil hat.
hack a day
There was some talk a while back about allowing WISP's into unused UHF spectrum.
Most rural areas have next to no UHF TV channels and very poor broadband availability. It was hoped this would take advantage of that reality by allowing good hill-following spectrum to be available for rural Internet users, on a renewable basis that would give preference to new UHF TV stations (as if).
No jokes about pig porn, please.
My God, it's Full of Source!
OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
The FCC regulates the Broadband Radio Services (BRS). This is (now) typically broadband internet access, and happens in from 2.495 GHz to 2.690 GHz, and uses spectrum formerly set aside for (oxymoron alert) wireless cable TV. You, too can get a license in this band for a $230 filing fee, today.
There is another band, 3.400 GHz to 3.600 GHz that's also currently set up for licensed wireless data, a la wi-fi. I don't have a link to this service unfortunately.
What the new announcement from the FCC adds to the party is something similar to GMRS or business band radios-- shared spectrum open only to licensed users. TFA mentions Part 90 as the section of rules that will cover this new spectrum. That's the same section of rules that covers business band radios (and whose licenses cost $100-ish). I would also expect frequency coordination to come into play at some point with this new service, just like you have with other Part 90 services. (Coordination tries to prevent harmful interference and squabbling.)