Slashdot Mirror

← Back to Stories (view on slashdot.org)

Finding the Pits In CherryOS

Posted by timothy on from the light-the-bombeck-beacon dept.

An anonymous reader writes "DrunkenBlog is carrying a story with piles of gathered evidence (including screenshots of code diffs) exposing the speed claims of CherryOS, and that the company behind it (Maui X-Stream) is not only stealing code from the open source project PearPC but at least several other OSS projects too. There are some choice quotes from PearPC developers on how it is harming their project. They appear to have a strong case, but enforcing the GPL could take help."

6 of 494 comments (clear)

  1. Warez too! by sH4RD · · Score: 5, Informative

    According to this thread on PearPC.net, he is using a warez'd copy of several programs as well.

    --
    WASTE - The Secure P2P
  2. already slow... by Neophytus · · Score: 5, Informative

    Article through coral

    Article through mirrordot

  3. Copyright infringement is NOT THEFT! by serviscope_minor · · Score: 5, Informative

    It is copyright infringement, just like the subject says.

    It does not matter who's copyright is being infringed or who is claiming it, it is STILL NOT THEFT.

    I'll bet I'll be modded down now, since this sort of thing is only accepable on an anti *AA thread.

    --
    SJW n. One who posts facts.
  4. Re:The sad truth... by dominator · · Score: 5, Informative

    That's not true at all. I've hashed it out with a few corporations over wvWare, my MSWord reading library. Usually the threat of action is enough to have the infringers quaking in their boots, and coax them into complaince. When it's not enough, you've got the FSF all-too willing to come to your aide:

    http://www.fsf.org/licensing/licenses/gpl-violatio n.html

    Regarding these cases, Eben Moglen (the FSF's general legal counsel) once told me that the reason you've never seen a GPL violation case go to court is because it's always a slam-dunk case that will be decided in your favor; that it's always in the infringer's best interest to settle out of court. I don't know how self-serving that statement was, but it's worth pondering at least. It's been my experience, in any case.

  5. Re:The sad truth... by tomjen · · Score: 5, Informative

    No you need assitance from the GNU foundation - they have the lawyers (two law professors if i am not mistaken) and they would like to fry that company - then everybody would fear and respect the GPL.

    --
    Freedom or George Bush
  6. Why not do something about this? by Amich · · Score: 5, Informative

    It's obvious this sort of thing is an outrage, and we should stand up and do something better than preaching to the choir on Slashdot.

    This story made me decide to donate to the PearPC project http://sourceforge.net/donate/index.php?group_id=1 08675 . I'm sure if enough donations piled up, PearPC's authors would go after CherryOS in court.