Burst.com and Microsoft Settle
prostoalex writes "Microsoft and Burst.com announced a tentative settlement, where Microsoft will pay Californian company $60 mln for allegedly stolen multimedia streaming software. Robert X. Cringely provided the recap of the court case back in 2003 (and Slashdot discussion ensued). According to Burst claims, Microsoft entered a non-disclosure agreement with the company to learn about Burst's multimedia streaming technology. Later the technology, for which Burst has 37 patents, has been found in Windows Media Player. When aksed to present the archives of the e-mails and all communications within the company for the trial, Microsoft somehow presented all the documents that preceded before the deal and the documents that followed it. The e-mails during the 35 weeks that negotiations were held mysteriously disappeared. In court Microsoft claimed the e-mails were erased from employee's desktops, e-mail servers and server backups. The technology was not interesting to Microsoft, lawyers insisted, so the electronic trail of communications was erased."
Strange, I found this one in my box a few years ago...
A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
The missing emails were actually attributed to a rarely-used update to Outlook's Clippy-assistant:
"It looks like you're being sued. Would you like me to delete all correspondence related to the lawsuit?"
I'm a big tall mofo.
Micro$oft is just too embarrassed to admit their Exchange server crashed. ;-)
I don't think I want to buy software from a company that randomly loses data... oh wait I dont
The Answer