Slashdot Mirror


Build Your Own Bluetooth Sniper Rifle

Jim Buzbee writes "I don't think I'd do it, but these guys built a Bluetooth Sniper rifle, went to the roof of a downtown Los Angles skyscraper and pointed it at nearby buildings. See what they found, and if you're so inclined, they'll show how to build your own and maybe, just maybe, you too can snag Paris Hilton's address book." (Which was not snagged via Bluetooth snooping, as the article points out.) This version looks a bit more polished than the one mentioned last August.

32 of 309 comments (clear)

  1. Frightening, ? by fembots · · Score: 4, Interesting

    After the DC Sniper incident, this gave me a fright as I thought someone has built a bluetooth-guided sniper rifle, which indicates when your bullet is aligned perfectly with your target's bluetooh tag, and those who auto-accept Bluetooth pairing are in trouble.

    Seriously though, I wonder how many people do auto-accept BT connections? My PDA only accepts known pairs, so you need to physically talk to me to pair you up for the first time.

    The friendly article seems to mentioned the "success" in BT detection, but didn't go in details of successful connection. It's like car thieves claim to detect 20,000 cars in the city centre, but didn't say how many were unlocked.

    1. Re:Frightening, ? by YetAnotherAnonymousC · · Score: 4, Informative

      Fear not. Perfectly aligned in the EM wave sense does not equal correct alignment in the mass/bullet sense. One must adjust for windage, for one thing. For another, even if you could get the range via bluetooth, the parabollic trajectory of the bullet (some calibres are 'flatter' than others, and even different manufacturers) must be taken into account based on that range.

    2. Re:Frightening, ? by back_pages · · Score: 4, Funny
      Fear not. Perfectly aligned in the EM wave sense does not equal correct alignment in the mass/bullet sense. One must adjust for windage, for one thing. For another, even if you could get the range via bluetooth, the parabollic trajectory of the bullet (some calibres are 'flatter' than others, and even different manufacturers) must be taken into account based on that range.

      Yeah, no kidding! Gosh, if someone aimed EXACTLY at my blue-tooth cell phone, held up to my ear, by the time the bullet traveled 300 yards it would be AT LEAST 12 inches lower and 2 or 3 inches to either side! HA! The joke is on them!

      Eh..

    3. Re:Frightening, ? by Pepsi__Blue · · Score: 4, Informative

      Don't say at least, ecause some sniper rifles are capable of much better performance, although they are very costly. For example, the Barrett M82A1 has an MOA of 1.5-2.0 or about 4.5"-6" drift at 300 yards. Additionally, the drift depends on the angle at which the rifle is fired, even if it is aimed directly at your phone. If you're shot at from above or below there will be an additional downwards component of the bullet's velocity working with the force of gravity causing the bullet to fall faster, whereas if you are up high and shot from below there will be an upwards component of the bullet's velocity working with gravity to decrease the drift of the bullet.

      just a remiander (in the absence of air resistance, and bullets are designed for minimal air resistance)

      Dy = 0.5(-32 ft/s/s)(Dt)^2 + v*sin(a)(Dt)
      Dt = (Dx)/(v*cos(a))

      so:
      Dy = 0.5(-32 ft/s/s)((Dx)/(v*cos(a)) + (Dx)tan(a)

      where:

      a=angle
      v=inital velocity
      Dt= change in time
      Dx= change in horizontal position
      Dy= change in vertical position

      therefore, if a is between 0 and 90 degrees there will be less drift than if a is between -90 and 0 degrees.

    4. Re:Frightening, ? by node+3 · · Score: 4, Funny

      Well, the parabolic issue is just math, so that's no problem.

      As for the issue of wind--you could use the cell phone's internet connection to check the weather.

      And if you miss? Have the camera snap a photo so you can see where the bullet hit, and compensate for the next shot.

      This could be a movie...

      The trailer:

      [fade in, city street scene, zoom in on businessman's cell phone, it reads 'accessing weather net...']

      Raspy Voice Guy: "In a high tech world gone mad, your cell phone can kill you..."

      [fast fade out with gunshot sound]

      RVG: "From 200 yards away."

      [abrupt music 'attack', then fast and disconcerting drums, lot's of quick shots of a normal city street life interspersed with people looking up from their phones to some distant skyscraper window]

      RVG: "This summer, in theaters everywhere, your phone bluetooths you."

    5. Re:Frightening, ? by Dun+Malg · · Score: 4, Insightful
      You're proud to be a fucking murdering bastard ?

      Though you've been modded down for the flamebait monger you are, and I know I shouldn't feed trolls, I feel compelled to address this idiocy. First, murder is a legal term, roughly defined as "the unlawful taking a human life". Now, since hunting animals is neither unlawful nor taking human life, you're an idiot (actually the correct conclusion is that it's not murder, but I like the idiot one better). Second, even if we ignore the misuse of the word murder and get to the premise of your position, i.e. that killing animals is a bad thing, this leads to other flaws in your position. Are coyotes "bad" for killing rabbits? Are house cats "bad" for killing birds? Humans hunt ungulates like deer and elk to keep their populations down. If we didn't, they'd overpopulate and starve to death in the winter. But I guess sensitive people like you would rather see hundreds of deer die of malnutrition and those that survive suffer the pain of hunger, rather than hunt enough of them to keep there numbers stable.

      Moron.

      --
      If a job's not worth doing, it's not worth doing right.
  2. Not wise... by lga · · Score: 5, Insightful

    From the article:

    We decided to quickly conclude the scan, given police activity in the area earlier in the day from a bomb scare.

    You too can get shot for looking like a terrorist!

    1. Re:Not wise... by pete6677 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      For this reason, it would be an excellent idea to make the thing NOT look like a gun at all, even if it is unidirectional. People tend to get suspicious of strangers pointing gunlike objects around their neighborhood.

    2. Re:Not wise... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      DARWIN AWARD CANDIDATE 1: Hmm...I wonder if Airforce One has BlueTooth vulnerabilities.
      DARWIN AWARD CANDIDATE 2: Hey yeah! Get out your nifty BlueTooth detector thingie!

    3. Re:Not wise... by OverlordQ · · Score: 4, Informative

      Image of the gun. Imo somebody could easily mistake that for a homebrew silencer on the end.

      --
      Your hair look like poop, Bob! - Wanker.
  3. See what they found by KinkifyTheNation · · Score: 5, Funny
    See what they found...
    You mean other than a dozen FBI agents bursting down their door?
  4. Uh Oh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    I think the server just got headshot.

  5. The inherent Bluetooth flaw... by lxt · · Score: 5, Insightful

    ...is human curiosity. Yes, there are many dangers from snooping, and there have been recent reports of prototype Bluetooth viruses - but even upgraded and securer versions of the protocol won't stop the fact that you just won't be able to refuse opening that interesting looking picture somebody is trying to send you.

    I've seen it a lot at my school, whereby a particularly dodgy or deprecating picture (no goatse yet, but can't be long) is passed along in the lounges by somebody simply searching for Bluetooth phones and sending a pic, which simply can't be refused ("because it might be something important!!!"). I'd say it's even more tempting to accept a Bluetoothed file than an email attachment, because in Bluetooth you're only getting the bare information about a file (ie, the size of it and file type), whereas you can generally filter out automatically generated email viruses with ease...

    The solution is to turn Bluetooth off all the time except when you want to use it (something I do anyway, since it conserves battery power), but a surprisingly large number of people seem to have it on all the time.

  6. Happy hunting by k.ovaska · · Score: 5, Funny

    Site is dying. Now they're facing the real test: can you use a Bluetooth rifle against a Slashdot attack? There's one Slashdotter... another one... look, over there! But the battle is hopeless, most Slashdotters are secure in their parents' basement.

  7. ObMirrorDot by semaj · · Score: 5, Insightful

    It's not even funny any more how fast these sites go down. It doesn't do the site owner or us any good - once again, what will it take for Slashdot to implement a mirror system?

    For example... this one.

    --
    Meep meep
  8. Yeah, especially since... by evolutionaryLawyer · · Score: 4, Insightful

    They made the think look like a rifle with collapsing stock etc... A kid almost got killed outside detroit about a year ago for hanging around on a roof with a paintball gun.

    So let me get this straight, if you have your device always on and discoverable you are vulnerable? Jesus, I would never expect that. Next thing you know it will be dangerous to be connected to the web without a firewall installed.

    Bluetooth is nice, but the security measure do seem pretty weak, no minimum pin length etc.

  9. a better use by Sv-Manowar · · Score: 4, Funny

    how about instead of sniper rifles in a city, binoculars on a nudist beach ?

    why do the best inventions always need to be modified to be better.

  10. I'm sorry, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    ...this is idiotic. Not their little invention (which is pretty slick), but their test on top of a skyscraper. Are you really that fucking stupid? A couple of guys with a sniper rifle sitting on top of a tall building is just asking for trouble. Probably doesn't even have a license for it. This is even more stupid than that guy who shined a laser into an airplane cockpit on more than one occasion. I've done some dumb things in my life, but Jesus Fucking Christ. Cops have killed people for less than that.

    1. Re:I'm sorry, but... by cgenman · · Score: 4, Funny

      It's LA. They'll probably just think he's looking for the freeway.

  11. I dont think Sniper Rifle is the correct term here by OverlordQ · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Really, they should of called it something besides a 'Sniper Rifle' I'm sure that'd go down well when the cops ask what you're doing.

    "Oh i'm just pointing my Bluetooth Sniper Rifle at that crowded building of . . ."

    *insert police beatdown here*

    --
    Your hair look like poop, Bob! - Wanker.
  12. No such thing as short range RF by G4from128k · · Score: 4, Informative

    This article shows that "short range" RF technologies such as bluetooth or RFID are only short range in the context of a particular transceiver. If someone wants to access an RF device from a greater distance, they need only build a high-gain antenna.

    --
    Two wrongs don't make a right, but three lefts do.
    1. Re:No such thing as short range RF by C10H14N2 · · Score: 5, Funny

      True. Voyager 1 was on the order of 23 watts and the last signal was received from over 8 billion miles away. Meanwhile, agents on Proxima Centauri have already begun a global RFID inventory of Wal*Mart stores world-wide in preparation for the invasion. They should have the results sometime late summer 2013.

  13. updated link... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    www.tomsnetnotworking.com

  14. Re:is it just me? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    Yes it would. Actually it would be easier to buy a rifle

  15. Sunday Slashdotting by cheezus_es_lard · · Score: 5, Funny

    You know the Tom's Hardware web admin is sitting in a family room somewhere wondering why his pager keeps going off.... Sunday Slashdottings must be one of the most evil things inflictable on a person ;-)

  16. Re:I guess by ThreeE · · Score: 5, Informative

    Actually no.

    You will hear a sonic boom anytime something travels faster than the speed of sound at your location. Typically, this means an aircraft must travel abut Mach 1.15 above you for you to hear the boom on the ground. An aircraft travelling Mach 1 will typically not produce a boom on the ground as the speed of sound is greater on the ground than it is at altitude. And, of course, anything travelling faster (i.e. Mach 4) will cause a boom as well.

    Back to our program.

  17. *HEADSHOT* by HTL2001 · · Score: 5, Funny

    "slashdot" did 46723723346844684 damage to "innocent webserver" in 1 hit(s) with the "bluetooth sniper rifle"
    head: 46723723346844684
    body: 0
    arms: 0
    legs: 0

    --
    By reading this, you have given me brief control of your mind.
  18. Why make it look like a rifle? by Mal-2 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    If they had made this look like a telescope rather than a weapon, and mounted it on a tripod, they could have pointed it just about anywhere they wanted and nobody would have paid a whole lot of attention to them. The rifle-like appearance only served to make the device look much more dangerous than it was.

    There are times when the form factor of a rifle makes perfect sense (rifle stocks for cameras, for example), but many others where it just DOESN'T. This is one of the latter group.

    Mal-2

    --
    How is the Riemann zeta function like Trump rallies? Both have an endless number of trivial zeros.
  19. Professional look? by Columcille · · Score: 4, Funny

    While the early version was held together with tie-straps and rubber bands, this newest version has a much more professional look.

    Yes, the professional hit man look is exactly what I'm trying to have when I'm searching for vulnerable bluetooth devices.

    --
    I love my sig.
  20. A Darwin award in the making... by Hartree · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Yes, indeed! Let's make something that looks like a heavy rifle with a scope on it. Then climb up on a skyscraper in downtown LA and start pointing it round at other buildings and pedestrians down on the street, etc.

    Double bonus points if Schwarzenegger or some other high profile politician is in town that day.

  21. what's in a shape? by idlake · · Score: 4, Funny

    I forgot to add: make any such device look like a gigantic Christian cross, not like a sniper rifle. People have a hard time banning crosses and you have a God-given right to point crosses anywhere you please. If it has a Bluetooth antenna at its tip, well, that's just an expression of your religious commitment to communicating with God and your fellow man.

    And, whatever you do, don't make it shaped like a 4ft dildo. With sniper rifles, at least the powerful gun lobby will stand behind you. When someone stands behind you while you are pointing a 4ft dildo off a rooftop, it's probably not to protect your civil liberties.

  22. I saw the words Paris Hilton and Sniper Rifle... by AndyChrist · · Score: 4, Funny

    Imagine my disappointment.