Slashdot Mirror


Cybersquatter Ordered To Give Up iTunes.co.uk

DigitumDei writes "Originally reported on Slashdot last year when Apple accused Benjamin Cohen of being a cybersquatter, the UK Internet registry has now ordered Cohen to give up the domain to Apple. Nominet ruled that Cohen had made an "abusive registration," and that he "is using the domain name in a way which has confused people or businesses into believing that the domain name is registered to, operated or authorized by, or otherwise connected with the complainant."

8 of 53 comments (clear)

  1. Re:How long? by xpccx · · Score: 4, Informative
    The linked /. story says:

    He registered ITunes.co.uk on Nov. 7 2000, and Apple trademarked ITunes on Dec. 8, 2000.

  2. Re:How long? by Ayaress · · Score: 4, Informative

    Apple registered itunes.com in August 1998, though. Over two years before Cohen's domain.

  3. Read the whole discussion by Ixitar · · Score: 3, Informative

    Apple applied for the trademark on October 24, 2000.

  4. Re:What's the big deal? by Ayaress · · Score: 4, Informative

    He registered it before they trademarked iTunes, not before they announced it. Furthur, he registered it over two years after Apple registered itunes.com (link is to whois data).

  5. Re:These stories always piss me off by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    Well, there's two reasons:

    1. Domain main names are not property.
    2. iTunes is a trademark.

    Put simply, this phisher is playing off surfers trying to use someone else's trademark as a domain name. Not complicated.

  6. Re:Looks pretty junk to me by amichalo · · Score: 4, Informative

    Still, it could be worse. The Food Standards Agancy and Financial Services Authority are both UK government run, but only one gets the http://www.fsa.gov.uk/

    But both may have their respective www.FoodStandarsAgency.gov.uk and www.FinancialServicesAuthority.gov.uk sites if they wish.

    "itunes" on the other hand is a brand name - it isn't short for anything - and like you said, this guy is certainly using their reputation and marketing dollars for his own gain.

    --
    I only came here to do two things; kick some ass, and drink some beer...looks like we're almost out of beer.
  7. Re:All your domains belong to Corporate America by commodoresloat · · Score: 2, Informative

    No; just the ones that are blatant attempts to capitalize on the popularity of one of their trademarks.

  8. Re:These stories always piss me off by CrackerJack9 · · Score: 2, Informative

    I never said it was default. What i was saying is that they were in violation of ICANN's policies. Please go read the Uniform Domain-Name Dispute-Resolution Policy before you type about something you obviously don't understand.