Slashdot Mirror
Over a Million Zombie PCs
Doyle writes "A BBC article discusses new research revealing that over 1 million computers have been compromised and are being used in bot nets. From the article: 'The largest network spied on by the team was made up of 50,000 hijacked home computers.'"
If 1,000,000 computers can be identified as being zombie machines than 1,000,000 computer owners can be contacted. This is THE major problem afflicting the internet, why dont governments form a unit to identify and at least notifiy the owners of these machines? Will it take a major internet terrorist attack like bringing down a power grid to make governments act?. As net users we should advocate government involvment in a measured controlled way rather than the reaction that will come after an attack (patriot act?)
"It's so convenient to have a system where everyone is a criminal" - A. Hitler
At my university, we have to run snort at the head end of the network in order to control the havoc these compromised machines create. We also monitor the number of simultaneous connections each machine creates and block the ones at the very top.
Better yet, why don't ISPs disconnect them until they can demonstrate they've been cleaned up?
"I'd rather be a lightning rod than a seismometer." -Ken Kesey
Now that the machines are known, their IPs are compiled into a list, what stops a good samaritan from setting up a script to patch them up?
It is probably quite complicated, technically speaking, because these machines now have to be scanned for every possible trojan, logger, virus in existance, but it's not impossible. Can an antivirus company, say, get a grant from a government to run a job like that?
You can't handle the truth.
One machine can be infected by multiple trojans.
One machine can reconnect to the same botnet multiple times as the person reboots to try and clear the problem.
One machine gets multiple IP addresses every time her reboots.
liqbase
It's sad, but it seems the only way to mitigate this is to hold the OS vendor responisble for insecure code. Similar to cars, we hold the driver responsible if they ( say ) drive drunk, but the manufactorer responsible if while driving the wheels come off.
A Human Right
I think the only plausible defense against a botnet of such a size is to use the botnet against itself. Allow one of your systems to be infected with the botnet - effectively join their network. Then sniff the network traffic to find out what IRC server and channel to join and any security codes that are necessary to control the botnet. Then upload a "virus" into the botnet that will patch the infected system and remove the botnet binaries. No more botnet.
The only thing that makes me think it might not work is that it's similar to the stereotypical way of ridding the world of aliens in almost every sci-fi movie. Come to think of it, I might have gotten this idea from Independence Day.
I'm a big tall mofo.
If Joe User started on Linux, or *BSD, then trying to use Windows would require taking time to learn.
You can tell that Windows is meant to be used as a tool and not just for hobby because in Office and the Explorer search pane they have dozens of these little characters that'll dance and do tricks and stuff without really helping you out in the process. And a bunch of the window actions can be animated to slow them down a bit. You've got connection limits and such to ensure that you only use your desktop for desktop stuff. Network authentication restrictions ensure that your intranet design fits a standard, well supported model, and that the right edition gets used for the right job. And the whole thing is pretty awesome for running games.
Linux must certainly be meant just for hobby because it comes with thousands of these little tools that just do their jobs without much in the way of glitter and animation to impress the user, or even a requirement that a user must be directly interacting with them.
My home machine's webserver gets regularly punished by bots that are sending buffer overflow URLs. I only have port 80 open, too. I use my home machine for mythtv, and I certainly notice when the bots start attacking me.
It's really annoying. I've thought about what I can do to shut down bots that are annoying me with excess traffic...
Does anyone have some good suggestions for keeping zombie PC traffic off of linux webservers either via firewall rules, apache config files, or ?
Perhaps a more interesting question is... if your machines is being attacked by a zombie PC, is it okay to attack it back (and try to take it offline?) - Isn't this sort of like 'self defense'?
bots that infect computers ever conflict with each other. Like Bot1 takes over a PC, then Bot2 comes along, and maybe they fight over that PC or its resources?
A modern day witchhunt.
My coworker is doing some of his own investigations into this stuff. He hooked up a freshly installed, but unpatched, windows2000 box to the net with a freebsd box in between to monitor traffic. Within minutes it was infected, and we could see IRC traffic: connecting to a hidden channel to await instructions. Not that I'm that outraged that an old unpatched windows 2000 box is vulnerable; it's just amazing how quickly a worm will get you if you are vulnerable! -K
My father recieved his first couple of Sparc-based unix boxes about 4 years ago in the wake of the dot-com collapse. For one reason or another, he decided to reinstall (a somewhat old version of) solaris from a disc he got with the system.
A couple of days later, his cable-modem based lan was nigh unusable; lo and behold, the unpatched solaris box was sending out data as fast as it could. Neither of us had the technical expertise to figure out what exactly had happened, but the process that was causing all the trouble was sitting in a dir full of various tools that seemed to be doing some sort of IP range scaning and self propegation.
If there are enough systems out there with a given hole, someone will exploit it, reguardless of OS.
I have a bunch of Win XPhome, Pro and W2K boxes @ home, fully patched, personal firewalled, my router screens what it can, in fact it blocks most every port and tosses pings from both sides. There's antispyware and AV scanners running on all desktops. And brute force scans for virus and all other malware kick off weekly. The uplink is cable (shared). Am I contaminated? You betcha. I can run any spyware tool @ random and find something and once a month I trap a virus either in the browser cache or the jpi cache on one or all of these machines.
Shit I forgot why I wrote this - oh yeah. What is the definition of "GOOD"? So while there 1.2 globzigillion zombies out there, what is the likelihood you're actually clean? I'd say damn near zero.
I work for a minor dialup in BFE, KY. We used to have large problems with our users getting hacked and zombiefied. But we decided since they weren't going to have a local firewall then we'd run one for them. Generally speaking Joe User doesn't need an internal SMTP server, http server, and so on. So we've got it set up now where they can connect to http, ftp, send their emails, send their IMs, play their games, and even use BT. But, alot of things that they'll never noticed are disabled for their own good. We'll occasionally have someone call about something not working and we'll then add in a rule to punch a hole for them. But I think that has been one person in the past year so far.
I'm surprised more ISPs don't do this as we used to be overloading our pipe due to the bots but now we're using half of our pipe durring peak times.
I could see this as a potential issue for some broadband ISPs but the saved money in bandwidth is much higher than the cost of manpower
....a group of super smart nersd somehow figures out how to do the same thing to these millions of PCs, but in reverse. Somehow create a worm that turns on the XP firewall, installs MS Anti-Spy and SpyBot and whatever else is needed. Isn't this easy to do (for the geek crowd)? Every new client I get (I'm a home computer tech) is infected with massive amounts of spyware. They have NO idea. My last two clients had more than 10,000 files and programs that were deemed spyware (not including cookies). It took forever to clean these machines, esp with those damn trojans not wanting to leave. I've got years of experience so I know what to do. But 99.999% of Windoze users doesn't have the damndest clue. My clients can't even set up their own DSL connections. how are they going to prevent their computers from being turned into zombies? Hell, they don't even know what that means.
It's up to the benevolent hackers or MS. My $$ is on the geeks outside of Redmond.
Bad PR but who the fuck cares.
tihihi I said boxen.
'Once scientists, even the dim-witted social scientists, get muzzled, the Western Civilization is finished.' - oldhack
Apparently they were using SUSE 8 Pro and Solaris 8 as the Honypots. My issue with the BBC article is that although (as can be seen from the Honeypot site) 90% of the attacks were aimed at, or originated from a Windows machine, the offending OS is mentioned only once.
They (the BBC) should spell it out, so that the general public actually gets notified officially, and thus make it a well known issue amongs non-IT literate people.