Slashdot Mirror


13 Things That Do Not Make Sense

thpr writes "New Scientist is reporting on 13 things which do not make sense. It's an interesting article about 13 areas in which observations do not line up with current theory. From the placebo effect to dark matter, it's a list of areas in need of additional research. Explanations could lead to significant breakthroughs... or at least new and different errors in scientific observations. Now there are 20 interesting problems for Slashdotters to work on, once you combine these with the seven Millennium Problems!"

7 of 1,013 comments (clear)

  1. Evolution by Profane+MuthaFucka · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    The thing about evolution that makes no sense is how people can come up with all kinds of reasons why it's not true. What it is about evolution that brings the wackos out of the closet? That's a mystery that will never be solved.

    --
    Fascism trolls keeping me up every night. When I starts a preachin', he HITS ME WITH HIS REICH!
  2. Re:The Pacebo effect is controversial by myowntrueself · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    "That would be a great example, except that methadone is addictive. The reason it is given to heroin addicts is that it doesn't get them high. It's unclear to me exactly why that is considered an improvement."

    IIRC it was invented by the Nazis.

    Need we say more?

    --
    In the free world the media isn't government run; the government is media run.
  3. Another thing that makes no sense... by Stormwatch · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    CIRCUMCISION. A pointless, destructive, and monstrously painful procedure. This is something to be expected from savage tribes of irrational beliefs, not from physicians in the world's richest country! More info, click the link in my sig.

  4. Pfah. by Grendel+Drago · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    the new UN ambassador who is pledged to destroying the UN

    You mean like the old UN ambassador who pissed on the UN when it needed pissing on, Daniel Patrick Moynihan? I certainly hope so.

    --grendel drago

    --
    Laws do not persuade just because they threaten. --Seneca
  5. Re:"No bearing"? by fforw · · Score: 0, Offtopic
    It contains a rejection of the divine right of kings, and recognition that rights are inherent in humans, not handed down from the government.
    What about the detainees held in guantanamo bay or send to states where they can be tortured?

    Where is the connection to that "mission statement"?

    --
    while (!asleep()) sheep++
  6. Re:Iraq needs Placebos by will_die · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Except intellegence for all over the world said thier was and it looks like they were correct. Most of the stuff was removed days before and while multi-nationalal troops where attempting to secure them.
    Also don't forget the removal of 1.8 tons of enriched uranium.

  7. You are your own worst enemy by ianscot · · Score: 1, Offtopic
    Except intellegence for all over the world said thier (sic) was...

    Does anyone remember hearing the French guy at the UN security council, Villepain, saying that that WMD evidence wasn't convincing? Remember how those dastardly French folks were saying that going to war was precipitate, and that Bush was "following the logic of war" rather than exhausting the inspections regime -- which turns out to have worked, gutting Saddam H's weapons programs?

    Do you remember how Colin Powell had to go before the security council and give a big presentation about all the rock solid evidence we said we had -- to convince the world? Sound familiar? Do you maybe recall how he later had to recant that testimony and apologize to the world for it? Is any of this ringing a bell? If intelligence "for all over the world" (yeesh) said this, why were Bush and company finding it necessary to go to those measures?

    Fox News is not the only source of information about world opinion. You might want to look into a few other propaganda spigots, at the very least.

    Most of the stuff was removed days before and while multi-nationalal (sic) troops where attempting to secure them.

    This is my very favorite argument made by dipshits (excuse me) who try to cling to those pre-war arguments. Gee, um, if the war resulted in huge stockpiles of weapons of mass destruction disappearing from where we supposedly knew they were, and if they're now in Syria or within Iraq's borders in a situation where insurgents are basically able to move at will within a "weak state" -- then doesn't that mean the entire war was a colossal failure at accomplishing its professed goals??? Because I don't remember Bush and his loyalist cadre of junta leaders saying they wanted to scatter the WMDs to the terrorist winds... Do you?

    --
    "Fundamentalism" isn't about divine morality. It's about human authority.