Debian Leaders: We Need to Release More Often
daria42 writes "The lack of a new stable release of Debian GNU/Linux since July 2002 is fuelling the campaigns of many candidates for the project's Debian Project Leader role, with many pushing for a shorter and more stable release cycle to stop Linux users heading for greener and more updated pastures."
omg roffl mao.
rub one out!
Zombies proclaim, "It would be cool if, like, we could eat more brains."
I hear many good things about Debian but if it doesn't have a fast release cycle I can't use it. The reason? I am a 100% Linux desktop user. The Linux desktop changes fast so I need the latest stuff. I realize that there is some cool Debian thing called apt-get which would let me upgrade to the latest stuff without upgrading my system, but I like to upgrade my system. The reason is that I like to clear everything out. If I have broken the installation of some package, or if (I hope it doesn't happen) my system has been rooted, I would like to just backup all my files and re-install. A six-month release cycle is good for that.
So, if Debian could catch up to Suse with all the latest things, I could use it on the desktop.
Then he'd have an excuse for being an incompetent drunkard.
There is always BSD...
Mod parent up, +5 insightful!
then "Victoria's Wet Secret" is done downloading and I can stop reading slashdot.
So...anyone seen it?
jfm3 writes "The lack of diplomacy, ecological consciousness, and ability to think critically since September 2001 is fuelling the campaigns of many candidates for the country's American President role, with many pushing for a politer and more intelligent foreign policy to stop Americans heading for greener and more peaceful pastures."
Perhaps this does not appear on topic, a crime against slashdot of the highest caliber. Of course, both statements are equally absurd because of their obviousness (at least to me).
I love Debian, and have run Sid since 2001... But seriously, the slahdot I've known and loved has turned into google.dot.org... /.? 3 GOOGLE Stories. C'mon, get a grip. In 2-3 years, everyone will be bitchin' about how Google's got a monopoly on DHTML-based apps. Never-mind the genious Amazon.com and Yahoo! and EBay have put forth with their apps - all based on Open Source, W3C compliant tech. Lose the google-goggles, people, I love Google apps as much as the next Netizen, but they're not the only company out there who "does no evil" for the web.
a9.com churned out OpenSearch in the last 48 hours, whhich Slashdot'ers would LOVE (RSS-based search, c'mon! How cool is that?!) PLUS it's got one of the coolest DHTML implementations I've ever seen! And what do we get on