Slashdot Mirror


China Tightens Rules For Educational BBSs

An anonymous reader writes "China is tightening control over online BBS run by colleges and universities. Educational institutions in China have received direct orders from the Chinese Ministry of Education requiring their BBSs to take actions including access limitation and registering users by their real identities, as well as strict content censorship. The admin team of the BBS of Nanjing University has refused to obey the order and has been dismissed."

28 of 304 comments (clear)

  1. This just in: by Neil+Blender · · Score: 5, Funny

    Oppressive country oppresses.

    1. Re:This just in: by ackthpt · · Score: 5, Insightful
      Oppressive country oppresses.

      But the thing that gets me, when I talk to some people from the PRC, is how strongly many believe it isn't oppressive, it's good for the whole of the country and then they have the temerity to point out all the crap the Bush family, the CIA and the State Dept have done over the years.

      Each side of the argument is so familiar with the transgressions of the other and willing to turn a blind eye to their own.

      Whatchagonnado?

      --

      A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
    2. Re:This just in: by Drooling+Iguana · · Score: 5, Insightful

      The difference is that China's currently bad, but slowly getting better, while the USA is currently good (at least relative to China) but getting worse.

      Personally, I'm just glad I don't live in either country.

      --
      ... I'm addicted to placebos
    3. Re:This just in: by Acius · · Score: 5, Insightful

      That sounds about right. Most people from most oppressive countries live pretty well most of the time. If it were not so, the governments wouldn't last very long. Honestly, even after these countries are "liberated," you're going to get a lot of whining from people about the good old days.

      A great example of this is South Africa. My family is from South Africa, and I still have many relatives there. If you'd told us twenty years ago that there were hit-squads, constant uprisings, military actions against blacks, and frequent prison torture, we would have had a tough time believing you. Even people who had just visited South Africa from abroad would have probably contradicted you. It seemed like a pretty nice place! Of course, in retrospect, all these things turned out to be true, but we didn't hear about it. We just went to work and went to school and never really crossed any of the invisible lines we didn't know were there.

      Similarly, I can happily recommend that you go visit China sometime. It's a pretty nice place, most of the time, and you could probably even live there quite comfortably. Quite a few of my friends have been there and they enjoyed the trip. You'll have to look really hard for even the slightest signs of your being oppressed.

      But that doesn't mean that everything's OK.

      --
      Acius the unfamous
    4. Re:This just in: by sfjoe · · Score: 3, Insightful

      rue... but seriously, the US and China aren't anywhere near being in the same league oppression wise.

      Undeniably true. However, taking China as a cautionary tale and tracking the direction "oppresiveness" in the USA is taking, no one can seriously claim that the USA is getting better. Except, of course, the radical right.

      --
      It's simple: I demand prosecution for torture.
    5. Re:This just in: by Rei · · Score: 3, Insightful

      you should ask recent immigrants and their kids from China

      Just like we asked Iraqi expats about WMDs? Just like we asked Cuban immigrants how strongly Cuba would resist if we invaded (Bay of Pigs)? Etc? Depending on the reasons for them leaving their parent country, expats can be among the most biased parties in anywhere.

      --
      Sometimes I doubt your commitment to Sparkle Motion.
    6. Re:This just in: by MightyMartian · · Score: 3, Interesting

      This didn't start with Communism. Chinese civilization has a long history of pursuing social order. The intensity with which Western countries tend to defend and rationalize individual liberties would confuse many Chinese from many historical epochs. To them, an authoritarian regime which makes these sorts of dictates is the norm. The Communists are simply the latest in a long line of rulers to do this.

      --
      The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
    7. Re:This just in: by MightyMartian · · Score: 5, Insightful

      To compare the abuse of a few people, most of which aren't even citizens, to that of the oppressive nature of the Chinese government is simply absurd. I'm not defending US actions, but is hyperbole to the point of flagrant dishonesty to compare the two. The very thing typed up above could very well, in China, lead to the maintainers of this website getting into at least some trouble. Ponder that.

      --
      The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
    8. Re:This just in: by Malor · · Score: 3, Insightful

      "We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable [inalienable] Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty, and the Pursuit of Happiness."

      ALL men. (and women, too, we've grown up a bit.) Not people who happen to have been born within the borders of the United States. ALL people.

      What part of "all" do we fail to grasp, I wonder?

    9. Re:This just in: by Malor · · Score: 5, Insightful

      You don't really get it, do you? Just because other people are worse doesn't make us good. We are TORTURING people. The United States of America, Land of the Free, Home of the Brave, is TORTURING people. By policy. With the full knowledge of the government AND THE CITIZENRY.

      What China does is *immaterial*. What Hitler did is immaterial. What Pol Pot did is immaterial. The United States is doing these things NOW. That is ALL that matters. Any noise to the contrary is just to try to distract you.

      And, from a practical standpoint, the Chinese that you (rightly) detest can point to the fact that we're invading other countries and torturing anyone we choose. At least the Chinese torturers mostly stay home.

      We can't preach from the moral high ground if we're not ON the moral high ground. How can we expect other countries to live up to ethical rules that we're willing to ignore whenever we find them inconvenient?

      Because of Bush's actions, we have lost most of our ability to influence behavior in the world. The terrorists didn't just win, they hit the f*cking jackpot.

    10. Re:This just in: by Zorilla · · Score: 3, Insightful

      And if you've forgotten Abu Ghraib already, keep in mind that not all countries oppress their own people.

      Brilliant! Except the Iraq prisoners there weren't America's own people.


      Isn't that exactly what the first guy said: NOT their own people?

      --

      It would be cool if it didn't suck.
  2. Same ol', same ol' by PIPBoy3000 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    It seems these days that when I read about China censorship, it's merely a continuation of policies that have existed for years.

    What's remarkable to me is that the admin group refused and was merely dismissed. A couple decades ago, I'd expect them to be jailed at the least.

  3. I'm simply not supprized by DavisNet · · Score: 5, Insightful

    This cannot come as a shock to any one who even casually follow the Chineese record on free speach.

  4. Tragic by proteonic · · Score: 5, Funny

    Tragic, tragic, really..

    Well, I'm off to but cheap clothes and electronics!

  5. Admins with backbone by Rightcoast · · Score: 5, Interesting

    It really took guts for them to stand up to this, and I wonder if there will be fallout for them the rest of the world will never hear. It says they were merely dismissed, but can you trust that infomation?

    1. Re:Admins with backbone by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Sure the reckless CCP government will do whatever they like to punish those who dare to stand up to them by any means.

      When SARS striked at the beginning, the central CCP goverment and Canton Province officials tried hard to hide every details about it. A group of brave people, including Yu Huafeng and Cheng Yizhong, made noise about the frightenning facts. Eventually, the government retreated by high pressure from inside and outside of the poor country.

      But when everything settled down and people forgot about SARS, the government tried and prosecuted those peole for obviouly rediculous excuses. Mr. Yu Huafeng, one of a handful brave Chinese intellectuals, is still in jail.

      I myself, a shameless Chinese coward.

  6. No Chinese Left Behind by Tackhead · · Score: 5, Funny
    > Educational institutions in China have received direct orders from the Chinese Ministry of Education requiring their BBSs to take actions including access limitation and registering users by their real identities, as well as strict content censorship.

    Validated identities are required for anybody in a school in order to protect our children from those who might attempt to infiltrate our schools and victimize them. Content "censorship" is nothing more than ensuring they're not exposed to content that they're not ready for. Hell, I'm an adult who likes b00bies, and I was kinda grossed out by Janet's.

    Oh, wait, this is China we're talking about. The totalitarian state. Umm, censorship is bad, mmkay?

    > The admin team of the BBS of Nanjing University has refused to obey the order and has been dismissed.

    "miss". So that's how they're spelling "appear" these days. Man, these kids and their SMS/TXT speak.

  7. My goodness! by Lord+Kano · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The admin team of the BBS of Nanjing University has refused to obey the order and has been dismissed.

    Now THAT is bravery!

    China is a country that will incarcerate your for not thinking what you're supposed to. China is a country that will put a bullet in the back of your head and sell your organs to the highest bidder. These people should be revered. They have true bravery.

    LK

    --
    "Hi. This is my friend, Jack Shit, and you don't know him." - Lord Kano
  8. Re:I don't see how they can do it by bwy · · Score: 4, Insightful

    How can you possibly control the actions of billions of people?

    To start with, you build the world's largest army, and then don't let the 1 billion citizens own guns.

  9. A difference? by bird603568 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    In my PUBLIC high school, they censora crap load of webpages, ie(slashdot, most wikipedia topics, and duh the porn and game site) Whats the difference between PUBLIC schools doing it and China doing it?

    1. Re:A difference? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Uhm, this is way different. China is enforcing these policies so they can have control over the DISCUSSION content. They also want to know who exactly is authoring content that China would deem 'radical' and dissentful, so they can lock them up in jail. You don't want to be in a Chinese jail.

      Your public high school, on the other hand: It is a school funded by public money. They are just censoring you from reading certain distracting material on the internet. They cannot enforce their policies off school grounds. While you are at school, you are on THEIR time. In China, the government would track you down where ever you are. You could post on a school BBS or a public BBS that is not affiliated with a university. They WILL find you. You are actually required by law to register with the local police that you are going to have internet service, before you register with an ISP. They also monitor all traffic in the country, and if they think you are doing something, it's jail for you. A fair trial? Nope. Especially for posting political content. Universities are hotbeds for this kind of stuff. Political prisoners are promised trials, but instead are detained in deplorable conditions, and have their trials constantly delayed and pushed back, until the accused are too sick to go on, and usually just give up and confess.

    2. Re:A difference? by stinkyfingers · · Score: 4, Informative

      It is not in the PUBLIC interest for you to be looking at slashdot, posting to wikis, or surfing porn at school. The community has (in thoery) come to a certain set of agreed-upon standards for Internet usage in your high school.

      In China, the community did not set the standards for Internet usage; the government did. Just because we have free speech here doesn't mean you can surf porn at school.

      I would also like to add that tomorrow you don't sleep through your U.S. Government class. If you've already taken that class, retake it.

  10. Government sanctioned identity theft by Skevin · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Funny you should mention that incident, because it presented an easy solution for one of China's biggest problems. (Sorry for getting OT here)

    China had effected scrict financial penalties for having more than one child sometine last century. Unfortunately, the typical agricultural sector family unit survives by having cheap labor, in the form of extra children. However, in order not to incur legal penalties, these families often hide those extra kids. As these kids grew up, it quickly became apparent that these kids had no identity, and without identity, they wouldn't be able to find work or acquire government benefits. The PRC refused to ackowledge their existence.

    Then, one day, the whole Tiananmen Square incident came about, and the PRC realized they could kill two birds with one stone. Rallying and arming as many "black children" [literal translation] as they could find on short notice, the PRC made a deal: "Kill one student protestor, and you may take possession of his identity. We will then cover the rest of your tuition and housing." After the bloodbath was over, all the "black children" were now legitimate, and since all students were accounted for, "no one" had really died. To this day, China can logistically claim there were no casualties in the incident. And what of the victim's families? They got a letter from school saying that their kids were striking off on their own and didn't want to see them again.

    China's very good at understating a lot of facts. (I should know - I still have relatives there.)

    Solomon Kevin Chang

    --
    "Twice half-assed makes an ass whole." --Solomon K. Chang
  11. Different Mentality by $criptah · · Score: 5, Insightful

    In order to understand why these things happen, you need to find out how people of China think. Using Western standards for benchmarking civil rights of China is not a smart idea because not everybody agrees with these standards.

    I worked with an exchange student from China a while ago. She was a nice girl, but she could never get the freedom of speech (expression/religion) thing. Whenever we talked about civil rights in China, she pointed out to all the porn, violence, drug use and other negative aspects of life that Americans could see on TV and everywhere else. I could not argue with her. She was raised in a differet atmosphere and that was a big issue between the two of us. She hated many things about the United States and one of them was freedom to say whatever you wanted. Three years of schooling here did not change her one bit.

    Now, I know that one person does not represent the whole country, but this experience gave me some insights on why peoeple may not like the Western way of life.

  12. The slashdot summary is full of lies by northcat · · Score: 5, Interesting
    The whole slashdot summary is a big lie. Here is a quick summary of what I can gather from the article:
    1. The chat rooms operated by the Tsinghua University have been closed down for non-students and, obviously, students require to indentify themselves.
    2. NO BBS has been asked to get identification from its users. No BBS have been asked to censor themselves (at least not in a new development and not in the context of this article)
    3. Only Tsinghua University has been asked to get identification from its students to access its chatrooms. No other university has been asked to do this (in the context of this article, of course).
    4. New rules have been passed which, according to TFA, 'will hold chat room operators liable for any "objectionable content" on their sites.' So it must be speaking of keeping "objectional content" away from websites of chatrooms or some online forums. And this need not be political content but just things like porn. But keep in mind that TFA is full of opinion [like calling the move an effort "to limit the exchange of ideas on the Internet" and "the Communist Party's Propaganda Department". And it states opinions as facts including it in the same sentences as facts instead of stating it separately. Like "China's most popular online chat room, hosted by Beijing's Tsinghua University, has been closed to non-students to limit the exchange of ideas on the Internet" and "the Communist Party's Propaganda Department has increased its monitoring of cyberspace for subversive trends, the report said." (emphasis mine)] so it's hard to distinguish what is fact and what is opinion. TFA continues to say that " As a result, Weblog portals have discouraged their users from discussing political or sensitive topics." But it's just the editors' opinion and it doesn't have any recent developments to back it up. (Maybe just the old complaints)
    5. TFA also says the Ministry of Education has ' issued a circular on strengthening "political thought" at universities'. Again, you can't tell what is fact and what is the editors' opinion.
    6. Nowhere does the article mention anything about the "dismissal of the admin team of Nanjing Univesity". This might be another article not linked in summary or this might be just a lie by the poster.
    The summary is just one big lie trying to make China look bad, written by someone who hates China. (And it groups a lot of stories together) And even TFA is not very unbiased. Proof that Slashdot has no journalistic integrity or ethics and occasionally spews out complete lies.
    1. Re:The slashdot summary is full of lies by Phoenix+von+Kanton · · Score: 3, Informative

      1. Not just non-students. They are blocking all the IPs outside the university. That is partly why the students are protesting.
      2. Of course. When everyone's real name is exposed, you don't really need censorship to prevent them from talking against the government.
      3. I don't know about this one so I have no comment. The students there have been required to provide a true campus address when they register on the BBS for quite some time now. It's not anything new.
      4. TFA might be full of opinions, but I wouldn't believe the government limits access to the BBS of the top university that produced the current president just so that people off campus won't see porn...
      5. From the notice issued by the admins of the two BBSs, that seems to be a fact.
      6. The admins refused to change the system, sent out a final notice to the community, and dismissed themselves. They are mostly student volunteers. They can quit anytime.
      And, you need proof that Slashdot has no journalistic integrity!? No, I didn't read TFA.

  13. Semi valid question.. by fliptout · · Score: 3, Insightful

    China already had two revolutions in the last century- first to overthrow the last imperial dynasty, and second, the communist revolution. The communist were able to seize control in 1949 largely because Mao was able to harness the discontent with Chiang Kai Shek's dictatorial government.

    Another thing many westerners do not understand is the politcal apathy of many of china's intelligentsia. The people know they do not have control, so they put it out of their minds. Concerning censorship- that is a legacy of china's conservative, confucian culture. They have been conservative for a very long time, and traditions like that die hard. The majority of people there have no desire to view what they censor, like porn or what have you.

    Just to qualify what I've said, I've lived in china, and I speak mandarin.

    --
    A witty saying proves you are wittier than the next guy.
  14. You mean like the army of the Soviet Union? by absurdist · · Score: 3, Insightful

    And no, I'm not passing on the idiot slashdot meme. The Soviet Union had one of the largest standing armies in the world AND a disarmed citizenry. When the population became completely fed up, none of that mattered any more; the government fell like a house of cards regardless. The same thing will happen in China and/or the US when the dissention reaches critical mass. As long as enough people have bread and circuses, however, they're willing to overlook little things like other people's rights.