Maggots: Coming to a Hospital Near You
Pokinatcha Punk writes "Forget breakthroughs in biotech. According to Yahoo! News maggot's may make their way back into popular medicine. According to the article 'maggots are remarkably efficient at cleaning up infected wounds by eating dead tissue and killing off bacteria that could block the healing process.'"
Maggots (or some other little parasitic vermiform beastie) would seem to be an excellent starting point for medical biobots. They have all the machinery for motion inside a living body and a neat little tool for slurping up flesh. Perhaps a bit of genetic engineering would give the critters a taste for tumor tissues or fat cells (and an abhorrence for critical tissues such as nerve cells, muscle tissue, or blood vessels).
Two wrongs don't make a right, but three lefts do.
I seem to remember whatching a BBC documentry on maggots cleaning wounds around 8 or 9 years ago .The story was fairly identical , although the BBC documentry whos name escapes me , went into far more depth , i belive it was tested in a hospital aswell.
I seem to remember the main advantage was the natural anestetic produced by the maggots as they feast on the effected tissue.Extremly gross and would really freak me out i imagine , but its supposed to be amazingly effective and have a far greater rate of recovery.
The only things certain in war are Propaganda and Death. You can never be sure which is which though
This sounds great for developing countries on a tight budget. (Well, medicine seems to be on a tight budget all over the world these days).
Anyone wants to take bets on how long it'll take for some company to create a genetically engineered worm that is slightly more efficient and patents it? And then somehow forces this new worm onto doctors all over the world, for a handsome fee of course.
Failing to learn from history dooms you to repeat it.
My first real experience with maggots was some guy eating a chicken leg and where he had bit the leg it was all magoty.
I was only 8 and it creeped the fsck out of me.
(What was that movie... poltergeist maybe?)
What the heck!?
.sigs are for post^Hers.
Apropos skin color, slavery in most areas, including Europe was not about skin color, but social and economic status. In Denmark in the 1600 and 1700's there was a very fine line between conscript, prisoner, and slave. Going further back, in all the Nordic countries going from the 1500's to the 700's, there were codified rules about slaves, their status and when they could work their own land. The status could change, slaves could become free men and free men could sell themselves into slavery. Most slaves could buy their freedom within four or five years of work.
Anyway, regarding maggots, that and a lot of non-allopathic medicinal knowledge was put on the back burner shortly after the social changes brought on by WWII and improved travel. In continental Europe in the 1400's there was actually a purge of such knowledge and practitioners of such knowledge by the church as part of a consolidation of power. There was a book, Malleus Maleficarum, "The Witches Hammer" on how to find and destroy these socially influential individuals.
Beta is broken and the link to classic doesn't work. Stop wasting our time or there won't be anybody left here.