GPL 3 Forking Risks Discussed
sebFlyte writes ""I fear a lot of unpleasant forking action when the GPLv3 comes out." The words of Debian maintainer Matthew Palmer. ZDNet has an interesting look at the possibility of forking when GPLv3 emerges, with lots of reassurance from Eben Moglen (the FSF's chief lawyer)."
At least they aren't GPL spooning.
Oh yeah, this is slashdot.
Has anyone ever encountered any pleasant forking action? This google image search is leading nowhere... perhaps safesearch needs to be off?
site's responsive
...
6 comments
oh no its the rapture
hello
can anybody hear me?
All this talk about forking is well and good. But what inquiring minds want to know, is will the GPL3 be written in a workmanlike writing style.
I believe the correct quote is ``where there's a will, there are a hundred schemeing relatives''
_O_
.|< The named which can be named is not the true named
RMS is the pope of Free Software.
Does that make Bill Gates the antichrist?
while(1) fork();
How long must we be a victim of fate and circumstance?
As long as it takes to change our minds.
With the Linux kernel locked into v2 of the GPL and exposed to international copyright and software patent attacks only code secured within the high walls and protective defenses of GPL v3 will be safe for FOSS developers. With the kernel sufficiently undermined developers and users alike will need to find a new, more protected, codebase from which to operate. That codebase is The Hurd.
There's no such thing.
There is no spoon.
Instead, try to realize the truth -- there is no fork.